All accepted new registrations through 8:00a ET on April 26, 2025 have been activated. Terms of use are available here: ucp.php?mode=terms

Thank you.
Announcements:
1. There is a known issue with Gmail refusing to deliver PHP server-generated email messages. What this means is you will not receive account activation messages or password reset links if using Gmail. Please consider registering your account using a service other than Gmail. Also, please be aware server-generated email messages may appear in your Spam or Junk email folder as opposed to your normal inbox.

2. The Buzzboard is available on the Tapatalk mobile app! Visit the Google Play store on Android or the App Store on iOS to download it. Keep track of your favorite topics, create new threads, and more!

The Weimar Years

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Post Reply
User avatar
Turkeytop
Posts: 9726
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:27 pm

The Weimar Years

Unread post by Turkeytop »

In his new book "The Weimar Years" Frank McDonough chronicles the period of time in Germany from the end of WW1 in 1918 to 1933 and the rise of Hitler.

It is eerily similar to happenings in the US today.

From a book review in today's Globe & Mail
“Solid middle-class groups, usually the cement that holds together democratic government, decided to support a party openly promising to destroy democracy,” McDonough writes, explaining, “Hitler’s party grew because millions of Germans felt democratic government had been a monumental failed experiment. To these voters, Hitler offered the utopian vision of creating an authoritarian ‘national community’ that would sweep away the seeming chaos and instability of democratic government, and provide strong leadership.”
User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: The Weimar Years

Unread post by TC Talks »

I believe that the Koch Brothers have been the architects of this partially from the grave.
283,000,000 Americans didn't vote for Trump.

"When the going gets weird, the weird go Pro."
-Hunter S. Thompson

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7759
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: The Weimar Years

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

This all started with Reagan. He ruined everything. He was the original outsider.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

NEVER EVER COMPLY WITH FASCISM!!!

The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
radiofann
Posts: 426
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:51 pm

Re: The Weimar Years

Unread post by radiofann »

For every libertarian Koch brothers duo (or Heritage foundation project 2025) accused of running the conservative side, there’s a more powerful father/young son duo (George soros and son Alex) to control the Dems like puppets on a string, for their desired radical progressive desires

https://nypost.com/2024/08/31/us-news/h ... is-pocket/

https://nypost.com/2024/09/25/us-news/a ... -nyc-home/

https://nypost.com/2023/04/08/george-so ... e-honchos/

https://nypost.com/2024/09/25/opinion/s ... s-strings/
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 18615
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: The Weimar Years

Unread post by Rate This »

radiofann wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2024 11:17 am For every libertarian Koch brothers duo (or Heritage foundation project 2025) accused of running the conservative side, there’s a more powerful father/young son duo (George soros and son Alex) to control the Dems like puppets on a string, for their desired radical progressive desires

https://nypost.com/2024/08/31/us-news/h ... is-pocket/

https://nypost.com/2024/09/25/us-news/a ... -nyc-home/

https://nypost.com/2023/04/08/george-so ... e-honchos/

https://nypost.com/2024/09/25/opinion/s ... s-strings/
Oh look… conspiracies about Jews…. This is not a movie… there are not really strings.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.

The Resistance begins now.

This is a pro-Democracy account.

Dear America… you were warned.
zzand
Posts: 2688
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:16 am
Location: right here

Re: The Weimar Years

Unread post by zzand »

Antisemitism rolls on.
User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 18615
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: The Weimar Years

Unread post by Rate This »

zzand wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:25 am Antisemitism rolls on.
Tis’ a crying shame.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.

The Resistance begins now.

This is a pro-Democracy account.

Dear America… you were warned.
radiofann
Posts: 426
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:51 pm

Re: The Weimar Years

Unread post by radiofann »

https://www.newsweek.com/i-worked-democ ... on-1961471


I Worked for Democrats for Years. Billionaires Have Unfettered Influence |

By Evan Barker
former Democratic campaign operative, campaign finance reform advocate, and podcaster
=========
During the summer of 2020, I worked as a consultant for multiple progressive DA candidates backed by George Soros and his foundation. In the places where they won, these DAs have since done immeasurable damage to the local communities. They failed to prosecute offenders, especially surrounding drug use and distribution, and allowed crime to run rampant, hurting communities of color the most—the very people they were supposedly trying to help.

Far from progressive, these Soros-backed DAs did more to hurt progressives than anything the Right has managed; to everyday Americans, the term "progressive" now conjures up images of fentanyl overdoses, crime, defecation in the streets, and riots.

I feel remorse for the work I did on these campaigns. The Soros money that was contributed to progressive DA races would have been better spent on supportive housing, mental health services, and recovery programs. Police need resources to arrest and imprison drug dealers and end open-air drug use. This is just common sense.

Unfortunately, the Soroses are just the tip of the iceberg.

I spent years fundraising for Democrats. I raised millions of dollars. And in the process, I routinely saw and heard about inappropriate relationships between donors and candidates that would bust anyone's bubble about the independence of our leaders. There is an entire donor ecosystem working against the interests of regular Americans—and it's the one top Democrats are swimming in.

Consider the long-time friendship between Kamala Harris and billionaire donor Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Steve Jobs. The New York Times described the women as being so close that they've gone on vacation together and consider each other family. Powell Jobs sat in Harris' exclusive friends and family suite at the DNC last month. She was also instrumental in getting Biden to step down to clear the way for Harris; one of her top aides circulated a polling memo to other key influential donors that allegedly showed Biden's inability to win.

It was another example of a megadonor overcoming the will of the people—and making things worse for voters. Now that the Kool-Aid from the DNC is wearing off, people are waking up to the realities of an untested candidate. Harris is barely beating Biden in key swing state polls, dodges questions from the press, and continually gaffes answers on significant policy issues. She can barely answer basic questions about her plans for regular people in friendly encounters with people like Oprah.

This is what happens when a candidate is anointed by donors and not selected by voters.


Or take Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn. He is a megadonor—a "big fish" as we would call him behind the scenes—and is expected to spend up to $100 million to ensure that Vice President Kamala Harris beats former President Donald Trump in the presidential election. But Hoffman has an agenda: He has publicly called for the resignation of FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan, who Hoffman said is "at war with American business."

The reality is somewhat different: Khan has been one of the only lifelines for working people in the modern Democratic machine. She stood up for workers' rights by banning non-compete agreements and led efforts to block major mergers of grocery stores like the Kroger-Albertsons, which would have resulted in higher food prices and hurt union workers.

If Hoffman is successful in his public campaign to replace Khan, he will further cement the Democrats as the party of the wealthy, the powerful, and corporate elite. I won't be surprised when he gets the job done.

Another name I've seen pop up many times in my years fundraising for progressive candidates is the San Francisco based Democratic donor and influencer Steve Phillips. Phillips has written books that focus heavily on the importance of race in politics, with titles like Brown Is the New White: How the Demographic Revolution Has Created a New American Majority and How We Win the Civil War: Securing a Multiracial Democracy and Ending White Supremacy for Good.

Yet, Donald Trump is on track to secure more support from minority voters, especially Black men, than any other Republican in generations. It's becoming increasingly clear that the real divide is the one separating the college educated from the working class of all races. But Phillips and others like him continue to focus exclusively on race—and you can see the direct impact this has on Democratic politicians, who talk much more about things like "equity" than they do about the class divide.

It's out of touch with the pulse of the country and deeply alienating to working-class voters who were once stalwart Democrats.

Unfortunately, the Democrats aren't getting the message. Last week, Alexander Soros posted images at his opulent New York mansion on X with Harris' VP pick, Tim Walz.

Is this how you convince people you're the party of the people? By posing with a billionaire nepo baby while Americans struggle to pay for groceries?

Some Democrats surely know how damaging such a photo is to their flailing brand. But Soros has so much power and influence that no one would dare tell him to take the photo down.

Internally, the Democrats know that like the photo of Walz with Alex Sorors, the Soros-funded criminal justice policies have been an embarrassing failure from an outcome, messaging, and public perception standpoint. They also know that Reid Hoffman and Laurene Powell Jobs do not have the best interests of regular Americans at heart—but they will continue to cower to them anyway.

Forget "Kamala is Brat" or the "Joy!" campaign. The image of Soros with Walz perfectly encapsulates the Democrats' real vibe these days—the unfettered influence the donors have over this party and the lives they've destroyed in the process.

Evan Barker is a former Democratic campaign operative, campaign finance reform advocate, and podcaster. You can follow her on X @evanwch.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: The Weimar Years

Unread post by TC Talks »

Great, there are two hundred Republicans, each with great stories who have endorsed Harris as the least damaging candidate. Antidotal storytelling is useless when you talk about an evil political movement.
283,000,000 Americans didn't vote for Trump.

"When the going gets weird, the weird go Pro."
-Hunter S. Thompson

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Post Reply