All accepted new registrations through 8:00a ET on April 26, 2025 have been activated. Terms of use are available here: ucp.php?mode=terms

Thank you.
Announcements:
1. There is a known issue with Gmail refusing to deliver PHP server-generated email messages. What this means is you will not receive account activation messages or password reset links if using Gmail. Please consider registering your account using a service other than Gmail. Also, please be aware server-generated email messages may appear in your Spam or Junk email folder as opposed to your normal inbox.

2. The Buzzboard is available on the Tapatalk mobile app! Visit the Google Play store on Android or the App Store on iOS to download it. Keep track of your favorite topics, create new threads, and more!

Michigan's Win

Discussion pertaining to Detroit, Ann Arbor, Port Huron and SW Ontario
radiofann
Posts: 426
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:51 pm

Re: Michigan's Win

Unread post by radiofann »

I didn’t watch the game but read on a national media site, a questionable holding call against Alabama, and a non-holding call benefitting Michigan occurred.

Anyone agree on this? Does these two calls take anything away from UM victory?

Thanks
dial-it-in
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2022 9:24 pm

Re: Michigan's Win

Unread post by dial-it-in »

radiofann wrote: Sat Jan 13, 2024 3:49 am I didn’t watch the game but read on a national media site, a questionable holding call against Alabama, and a non-holding call benefitting Michigan occurred.

Anyone agree on this? Does these two calls take anything away from UM victory?

Thanks
Anyone bitching about a specific holding call, and that includes local fans, is pathetic. Holding literally occurs on every single play and could be called accordingly. Do we really want that?
Post Reply