Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.
When I see Tudor Dixon
When I see Tudor Dixon
... I can't help but to see a MAGA Republican. We don't need another Marjory Taylor Green or Lauren Boebert. She seems pretty extreme with her stance on abortion. I have voted mostly Republican for a good while but I can no longer do so in good conscience. The MAGA Republicans, extreme righties, and QAnon wings of the party are well, quite terrifying. The Trump presidency and the January 6th insurrection has really changed my political views and perspectives. Whatever that was, I don't want it ever again. Politics are more decisive than ever before. Seems to be so much radicalism/extremism. As far as I am concerned, QAnon are domestic terrorists. All that said, Whitmer gets my vote and I will be voting in favor of abortions.
Woe to you, oh earth and sea
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
For the Devil sends the beast with wrath
Because he knows the time is short
Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast
For it is a human number
Its number is six hundred and sixty-six
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
Has she actually advocated to change the law to a total ban? Isn't it possible for her to have HER beliefs and HER opinions and not actually want to foist them on the rest of the populace but rather come to some meaningful agreement on what is the correct thing to to for the state??
And if you believe that " voting in favor of abortions", means passing Prop 3, I got some news for you. It does not actually do anything to make abortions restrictionless. In fact, there is language that specifically allows the legislature to regulate abortions beyond "viability", which can be argued down to 6 weeks (or maybe even less). If this passes, I'd bet the legislature sees that language as a GREEN LIGHT to push through some appropriate legislation that you probably won't agree with.
And if you believe that " voting in favor of abortions", means passing Prop 3, I got some news for you. It does not actually do anything to make abortions restrictionless. In fact, there is language that specifically allows the legislature to regulate abortions beyond "viability", which can be argued down to 6 weeks (or maybe even less). If this passes, I'd bet the legislature sees that language as a GREEN LIGHT to push through some appropriate legislation that you probably won't agree with.
- craig11152
- Posts: 2201
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
- Location: Ann Arbor
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
I'm not sure how anyone could argue viability down to 6 weeks.
Can you clarify how that could possibly happen?
Can you clarify how that could possibly happen?
I no longer directly engage Rate This
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
That'd be a different thread. You can certainly argue it's longer than that, but no way is it all the way up to 40 weeks.craig11152 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 12:48 pm I'm not sure how anyone could argue viability down to 6 weeks.
Can you clarify how that could possibly happen?
But don't you agree that just passing Prop 3 doesn't just "make abortion legal"??
That's aside from all the things it breaks.
Changes to the state Constitution should be well thought out and argued matters and only those most basic to the functioning of society within the borders of the state. Making willy-nilly changes makes a mockery out of the process and voting based on marketing dollars is a sure way to get there.
Perhaps we really need to consider pushing the 2026 Constitutional Convention proposal if we REALLY want to make changes.
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
She is, bought and paid for by Betsy DeVos... Dick got his face rubbed in the dirt a few years ago, and this is Betsy's new plan.Taco wrote: ↑Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:11 pm ... I can't help but to see a MAGA Republican. We don't need another Marjory Taylor Green or Lauren Boebert. She seems pretty extreme with her stance on abortion. I have voted mostly Republican for a good while but I can no longer do so in good conscience. The MAGA Republicans, extreme righties, and QAnon wings of the party are well, quite terrifying. The Trump presidency and the January 6th insurrection has really changed my political views and perspectives. Whatever that was, I don't want it ever again. Politics are more decisive than ever before. Seems to be so much radicalism/extremism. As far as I am concerned, QAnon are domestic terrorists. All that said, Whitmer gets my vote and I will be voting in favor of abortions.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/18/michiga ... itmer.htmlPOLITICS
Michigan governor’s race could cost $100 million as billionaire DeVos family spends millions to oust Gov. Gretchen Whitmer
For Kristian Trumpers are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people.
-Romans 16:18
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
-Romans 16:18
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
Viable means needs no mother present… I think that’s 25 weeks or something. It essentially has to be a really small definite human by that point… It can’t be something that looks like there’s an off ramp to a small mammal or a lizard…km1125 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 11:09 am Has she actually advocated to change the law to a total ban? Isn't it possible for her to have HER beliefs and HER opinions and not actually want to foist them on the rest of the populace but rather come to some meaningful agreement on what is the correct thing to to for the state??
And if you believe that " voting in favor of abortions", means passing Prop 3, I got some news for you. It does not actually do anything to make abortions restrictionless. In fact, there is language that specifically allows the legislature to regulate abortions beyond "viability", which can be argued down to 6 weeks (or maybe even less). If this passes, I'd bet the legislature sees that language as a GREEN LIGHT to push through some appropriate legislation that you probably won't agree with.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
After fetal viability, not before. Which puts it at ~25 weeks, as Rate This said.km1125 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 11:09 amAnd if you believe that " voting in favor of abortions", means passing Prop 3, I got some news for you. It does not actually do anything to make abortions restrictionless. In fact, there is language that specifically allows the legislature to regulate abortions beyond "viability", which can be argued down to 6 weeks (or maybe even less).
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
You know what? The proposed amendment does not define that. It can be argued that "In biological terms, viability is the ability to survive successfully". regardless whether the fetus is dependent on the mother or not. You could also argue the other direction, that many kids these days (even over 21) are not viable because they likely could not survive without the mother present.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 2:50 pmViable means needs no mother present… I think that’s 25 weeks or something. It essentially has to be a really small definite human by that point… It can’t be something that looks like there’s an off ramp to a small mammal or a lizard…km1125 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 11:09 am Has she actually advocated to change the law to a total ban? Isn't it possible for her to have HER beliefs and HER opinions and not actually want to foist them on the rest of the populace but rather come to some meaningful agreement on what is the correct thing to to for the state??
And if you believe that " voting in favor of abortions", means passing Prop 3, I got some news for you. It does not actually do anything to make abortions restrictionless. In fact, there is language that specifically allows the legislature to regulate abortions beyond "viability", which can be argued down to 6 weeks (or maybe even less). If this passes, I'd bet the legislature sees that language as a GREEN LIGHT to push through some appropriate legislation that you probably won't agree with.
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:53 am
- Location: Fishing somewhere
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
I'm waiting to see what Tudor Dixon has to say on the campaign trail. Her comments being repeated in the attack ads are dated when she was like 10th in line to even have a chance. Before all the ballot disqualifications. Now she is the nominee.
It's a whole new ballgame.
Let's just see what she handles it now.
It's a whole new ballgame.
Let's just see what she handles it now.
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
She’s gonna do what all the other Republicans are doing… deny having said what’s clearly on tape. She will probably try to tack to the center. The same is true of Election denial… Don Bolduc out in the New Hampshire senate race was denying the results of the 2020 election until he won the nomination. Within 48 hours he “had seen the light” and Biden was the legitimate president however begrudgingly… it’s being repeated endlessly this cycle. Words matter whether she’s a shoo in or the 1000th in line.Circle Seven wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2022 4:44 pm I'm waiting to see what Tudor Dixon has to say on the campaign trail. Her comments being repeated in the attack ads are dated when she was like 10th in line to even have a chance. Before all the ballot disqualifications. Now she is the nominee.
It's a whole new ballgame.
Let's just see what she handles it now.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
Are either candidate's campaign ads directly attacking the other candidate?
I see TONS of attack ads on Dixon, but Whitmer is literally a shiny happy person in all of the ones her campaign's paying for (directly)...
I see TONS of attack ads on Dixon, but Whitmer is literally a shiny happy person in all of the ones her campaign's paying for (directly)...
"Enjoy every sandwich."
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
The PAC is doing the dirty work… it’s one strategy…
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7333
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
Republicans are running attacks ads against Carl Marlinga.
I am sure that the Republicans are saving their attack ads until after the debate so that they can misquote Gretchen.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
Misquote??? How about pointing out how badly she fucked up as a covid dictator. Anybody that supports her is either a partisan hack or an idiot.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 12:15 amRepublicans are running attacks ads against Carl Marlinga.
I am sure that the Republicans are saving their attack ads until after the debate so that they can misquote Gretchen.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Re: When I see Tudor Dixon
Then apparently 55% of the state are idiots.Matt wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 8:18 pmMisquote??? How about pointing out how badly she fucked up as a covid dictator. Anybody that supports her is either a partisan hack or an idiot.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Tue Sep 20, 2022 12:15 amRepublicans are running attacks ads against Carl Marlinga.
I am sure that the Republicans are saving their attack ads until after the debate so that they can misquote Gretchen.
Donald Trump… In your guts you know he’s nuts.