Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

The technical side of broadcasting. Think IBOC is a sham? Talk about it here! How about HDTV? Post DX reports here as well.
CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by CK-722 »

What's the difference between the 5T and the 5H? WFDF had a 5H, and it seems like it was wider, like three panels?
Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
audiophile
Posts: 9391
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by audiophile »

Ed Joseph wrote: Sun Dec 01, 2019 7:29 pm ImageThis, exactly... Only left channel was wired up.
I installed that unit for WQON to protect STL's when it was next to bakery. It doesn't have a clipper either.
Psalm 139:13 ~ For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.

Jeremiah 1:5 ~ "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you;

Exodus 20:13 ~ “You shall not murder."
FET-500
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 9:22 am

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by FET-500 »

audiophile wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2019 8:33 am
Ed Joseph wrote: Sun Dec 01, 2019 7:29 pm ImageThis, exactly... Only left channel was wired up.
I installed that unit for WQON to protect STL's when it was next to bakery. It doesn't have a clipper either.
Please elaborate: was the signal digitized and sent out on microwave?
audiophile
Posts: 9391
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by audiophile »

Analog Microwave. A pair of Marti STL8's.
Psalm 139:13 ~ For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.

Jeremiah 1:5 ~ "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you;

Exodus 20:13 ~ “You shall not murder."
FET-500
Posts: 464
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2018 9:22 am

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by FET-500 »

audiophile wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:12 am Analog Microwave. A pair of Marti STL8's.
My friend at work (our webmaster) used to do point to point on the Mexican border. The equipment is getting so cheap, we're joking about our own network.

My brain is starting to spasm over the idea of a "man-in-the-middle" attack on this type of link.
User avatar
Ed Joseph
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:27 pm

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by Ed Joseph »

At some point, this Orban was evidently moved to the AM... as I think back, the phase was probably reversed to the TX.

Honestly, I think I'd rather have analog STL over digital. That's just me. I do not trust digital, or especially the internet infrastructure, to be hardened enough if the Sun decides to flare us in a major way or an EMP occurs due to any event. I just feel if that happens, analog stuff has a better chance of surviving. It should always be a backup option at any rate.
I confirm all my information through a high, white whore's souse!
CK-722
Posts: 1284
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 3:53 pm

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by CK-722 »

WKNX used an RCA BTA 10H, which is outwardly nearly identical to an RCA BTA 5H.

Barry Mishkind pictures of 5 kW transmitters back in the 1950s and 1960s.

https://www.oldradio.com/archives/hardware/RCA/5.htm
Is THAT where they got the idea for the 486-SX?

Same (x, y, z), different (t)

Your bullet missed my trial balloon.

RTN Price. Not guaranteed. As of 12:30, 157.71 Down 0.22.

Artificial Intelligence is a Child that needs a Parent to guide it through.
User avatar
Ed Joseph
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:27 pm

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by Ed Joseph »

I remember actually seeing that RCA at WKNX working back in the Day. It was trashed to make room for the MW10 in around 1979-80.

Edit: Honestly, I thought the RCA sounded better than the Harris.
I confirm all my information through a high, white whore's souse!
k8jd
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Commerce, MI

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by k8jd »

The rectifier tube may have been a good sub. many of the 5V filament dual diode tubes were using the same pin linup for the elements, only made physically different to handle more or less Plaate current and voltage. .
audiophile
Posts: 9391
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by audiophile »

Ed Joseph wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2019 3:32 pm I remember actually seeing that RCA at WKNX working back in the Day. It was trashed to make room for the MW10 in around 1979-80.

Edit: Honestly, I thought the RCA sounded better than the Harris.
Why did they trash it, if it was working?
Psalm 139:13 ~ For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.

Jeremiah 1:5 ~ "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you;

Exodus 20:13 ~ “You shall not murder."
User avatar
Ed Joseph
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:27 pm

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by Ed Joseph »

If I recall, it was having some problems with the plate transformer, it was up on woodblocks to isolate it from the cabinet because it has shorted internally. It would do low power but not high. I hope I have that right, it was like 1979.

Edit to add: I would guess, if the engineer wasn't Jim McCluskey, it probably could have been "properly" repaired and kept for backup. Then again, it was pretty big and they had to shoehorn an MW10 in that small space on Gabel rd.
I confirm all my information through a high, white whore's souse!
User avatar
Ed Joseph
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:27 pm

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by Ed Joseph »

UPDATE on DX-35

At this point, there is something in this unit which just isn't right. Something changes after it's making moderate power (45watts in CW) into dummy load a few minutes, front panel meter pins and the fuse opens.

I am tempted at this point to strip this thing down and make a simple all-band amp out of it.
I confirm all my information through a high, white whore's souse!
audiophile
Posts: 9391
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Trials of restoring Heathkit DX-35

Unread post by audiophile »

Bad tube ruled out?
Psalm 139:13 ~ For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.

Jeremiah 1:5 ~ "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you;

Exodus 20:13 ~ “You shall not murder."
Post Reply