Some registered account users are experiencing password recognition issues. The issue appears to have been triggered by a PHP update last night. If this is occurring, please try logging in and using the "forgot password?" utility. Bear in mind auto-generated password reset emails may appear in your spam folder. If this does not work, please click the "Contact Us" option near the lower right hand corner of the index page to contact me via email.

Thank you for your patience!
- M.W.

Is this cheating?

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues in the State of Michigan. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Graham Wellington
Posts: 879
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm

Is this cheating?

Unread post by Graham Wellington »

https://www.emilystivers.com/meet-emily

I get that to gain an edge in the Democratic primary field, it helps to be as diverse as you can. Being a part of any type of marginalized group gains you street cred. But the candidate above seems to have found a nice little loophole to make up for her lack of marginalization. She is a cisgendered white female who has been in a heterosexual marriage for 9 years. Not very good credentials if you expect to get anywhere in the Democratic party, or get money for that matter. So, she says that she is bisexual. Genius! Now she gets included on the lists of LGBTQ candidates to support, gets campaign money for being a member of the LGBTQ family, and instantly gets a leg up on the plain ol' straight heterosexuals she is running against. I'm duly impressed!
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Matt »

Graham Wellington wrote: Tue May 10, 2022 6:30 pm https://www.emilystivers.com/meet-emily

I get that to gain an edge in the Democratic primary field, it helps to be as diverse as you can. Being a part of any type of marginalized group gains you street cred. But the candidate above seems to have found a nice little loophole to make up for her lack of marginalization. She is a cisgendered white female who has been in a heterosexual marriage for 9 years. Not very good credentials if you expect to get anywhere in the Democratic party, or get money for that matter. So, she says that she is bisexual. Genius! Now she gets included on the lists of LGBTQ candidates to support, gets campaign money for being a member of the LGBTQ family, and instantly gets a leg up on the plain ol' straight heterosexuals she is running against. I'm duly impressed!
Is she in a throuple with her husband and Elissa Slotkin?
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Graham Wellington
Posts: 879
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Graham Wellington »

Matt wrote: Tue May 10, 2022 7:06 pm
Graham Wellington wrote: Tue May 10, 2022 6:30 pm https://www.emilystivers.com/meet-emily

I get that to gain an edge in the Democratic primary field, it helps to be as diverse as you can. Being a part of any type of marginalized group gains you street cred. But the candidate above seems to have found a nice little loophole to make up for her lack of marginalization. She is a cisgendered white female who has been in a heterosexual marriage for 9 years. Not very good credentials if you expect to get anywhere in the Democratic party, or get money for that matter. So, she says that she is bisexual. Genius! Now she gets included on the lists of LGBTQ candidates to support, gets campaign money for being a member of the LGBTQ family, and instantly gets a leg up on the plain ol' straight heterosexuals she is running against. I'm duly impressed!
Is she in a throuple with her husband and Elissa Slotkin?
A throuple would only benefit them in their races!

I understand that Democrats aren't big on vetting people. Whether it's a voter's registration status, people crossing the borders illegally, people claiming to be a certain sex, or a presidential candidate's cognitive state - the party doesn't like to pry insignificant things like that. But this seems like a case of stolen valor.
Motown322
Posts: 465
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Motown322 »

You mean politicians lie and say and do whatever they have to in order to gain support and votes???? This is shocking news.

I can't wait to see your reaction when you find out the sun rises in the East EVERY MORNING.
User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Bryce »

Motown322 wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 6:57 pm
I can't wait to see your reaction when you find out the sun rises in the East EVERY MORNING.
These day's you never know. The East may self identify as the West. If you challenge the assertation that East really is the East and cannot truly be the West, you will be called all sorts of names.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

Bisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Bryce »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pm Bisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
I can say I'm a great hockey player. I can feel like a hockey player. If I don't ever strap em on and get out on the ice, am I really a hockey player?
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

Bryce wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 11:02 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pm Bisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
I can say I'm a great hockey player. I can feel like a hockey player. If I don't ever strap em on and get out on the ice, am I really a hockey player?
Were you still hetero when you were a virgin?
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Matt
Posts: 11505
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Home of the National Champions

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Matt »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pm Bisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
There's a prominent picture of gumsy, a child, and Slotkin on a website claiming gumsy is bisexual. How would you feel if a Republican candidate proclaimed that he is heterosexual all over his campaign website?
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account

"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
Graham Wellington
Posts: 879
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Graham Wellington »

The irony is that LGBT people used to hide the fact that they were LGBT. Now, in the Democrat party, it appears you have to hide that you are in a seemingly committed heterosexual marriage. Gumsy :rollin makes sure to prominently display she is bi. It's listed before "mom", so it must be more important to her than her role as a mother. Whatever her status, her husband must be a major cuck.
km1125
Posts: 3789
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by km1125 »

Bryce wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 11:02 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pm Bisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
I can say I'm a great hockey player. I can feel like a hockey player. If I don't ever strap em on and get out on the ice, am I really a hockey player?
I see what you did there! :rollin
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

Matt wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 5:12 am
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pm Bisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
There's a prominent picture of gumsy, a child, and Slotkin on a website claiming gumsy is bisexual. How would you feel if a Republican candidate proclaimed that he is heterosexual all over his campaign website?
It wouldn’t bother me.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Bryce »

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 2:07 am
Were you still hetero when you were a virgin?
I imagine I was. I just didn't feel the need to go around telling everyone, putting the fact on a website and using it as a signature line.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
User avatar
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by MotorCityRadioFreak »

Bryce wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 10:47 am
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 2:07 am
Were you still hetero when you were a virgin?
I imagine I was. I just didn't feel the need to go around telling everyone, putting the fact on a website and using it as a signature line.
Because you didn’t have to do so. That is the world’s default.
They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
User avatar
Turkeytop
Posts: 9303
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:27 pm

Re: Is this cheating?

Unread post by Turkeytop »

Graham Wellington wrote: Tue May 10, 2022 6:30 pm https://www.emilystivers.com/meet-emily

I get that to gain an edge in the Democratic primary field, it helps to be as diverse as you can. Being a part of any type of marginalized group gains you street cred. But the candidate above seems to have found a nice little loophole to make up for her lack of marginalization. She is a cisgendered white female who has been in a heterosexual marriage for 9 years. Not very good credentials if you expect to get anywhere in the Democratic party, or get money for that matter. So, she says that she is bisexual. Genius! Now she gets included on the lists of LGBTQ candidates to support, gets campaign money for being a member of the LGBTQ family, and instantly gets a leg up on the plain ol' straight heterosexuals she is running against. I'm duly impressed!
Welcome back Lucky, or Leo. Or is it Lucy?
Post Reply