Got a question? Can't figure out how to get that neat picture under your user name? Need any other tech tips? Post it here! Also, this is where I make important site related announcements.
TC Talks wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 4:24 pm
About the only one who supports him is Audiophile, and, well, enough said.
Audiophile creeps the fuck out of me. I wouldn't be shocked to see a headline one day about the owner of a radio station getting busted for some gross stuff. I hope his wife takes time to sit down with their kids and ask them some difficult questions.
Cut out the bullshit. Another post like this and you'll be banned permanently from this site.
TC Talks wrote: ↑Mon Jan 01, 2024 4:24 pm
About the only one who supports him is Audiophile, and, well, enough said.
Audiophile creeps the fuck out of me. I wouldn't be shocked to see a headline one day about the owner of a radio station getting busted for some gross stuff. I hope his wife takes time to sit down with their kids and ask them some difficult questions.
Cut out the bullshit. Another post like this and you'll be banned permanently from this site.
I've edited the post there about the creep. Funny, I didn't see you complaining when the member in question was posting actual hate speech against MCRF...
bmw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 11:10 pm
I said I'm done posting in the politics forum until then.
Matt has been constantly harassing audiophile for some time now, and this time, IMO, has crossed the line.
There is a difference between harassing and calling out. I'll admit that last night's comment was a piss poor lapse of judgment on my part. That won't happen again.
However, I will not apologize for calling out someone who disdains EVERY personal behavior of Donald Trump supporting him because of what he thinks will happen if he's elected. Please note on the latter front, the political forum states: "Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule."
Matt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2024 1:55 am
Funny, I didn't see you complaining when the member in question was posting actual hate speech against MCRF...
Funny, MCRF didn't remember either when this very subject came up more recently. Even though I was literally the only person in that thread who came to MCRF's defense.
bmw wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 11:59 am
I am doing nothing more than defending an individual user of this forum. Neckbeard's comments, while probably not at the level of libel given the size and anonymous nature of this message board, are certainly defamatory in nature to any normal person reading them. Freedom of speech does not include the right to accuse somebody, without evidence, of hanging out with child predators. Even in a forum like this where the gloves are off 99% of the time, there are still some limits to what you can say - and suggesting, without evidence, that a user of this forum spends their time hanging out online with pedophiles crosses the line, IMO.
bmw wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 12:12 pm
All I will say in conclusion is that no matter how "joking" or sarcastic or not serious or whatever word you want to use your intentions may be, you still have to tread carefully when it comes to a few very specific subjects - child predators being arguably literally at the top of that short list. I mean, child predators are the one group of people who even violent criminals in prison find to be worthy of being beaten to a pulp. So associating a regular user here in any way with that group of people is just not appropriate no matter how you look at it.
bmw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 11:10 pm
I said I'm done posting in the politics forum until then.
Matt has been constantly harassing audiophile for some time now, and this time, IMO, has crossed the line.
There is a difference between harassing and calling out. I'll admit that last night's comment was a piss poor lapse of judgment on my part. That won't happen again.
It's already happened twice. Why should we believe it won't happen a third time?
audiophile wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 6:46 am
Putting your PhD to work?
Matt wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:29 am
Man the way he always brings up underage girls, you have to wonder if PhD is an acronym for his reaction to that subset of the population.
Matt wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:25 pm
Standing up for the presumed pedo?
Being the subject of ridicule is one thing. But in responding to anything audiophile says, you bring up the same "ridicule" over, and over, and over, and over again. And there's always these sexual pedophile undertones in your comments, particularly given what you already said back in 2021.
bmw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 11:10 pm
I said I'm done posting in the politics forum until then.
Matt has been constantly harassing audiophile for some time now, and this time, IMO, has crossed the line.
There is a difference between harassing and calling out. I'll admit that last night's comment was a piss poor lapse of judgment on my part. That won't happen again.
It's already happened twice. Why should we believe it won't happen a third time?
audiophile wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 6:46 am
Putting your PhD to work?
Matt wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:29 am
Man the way he always brings up underage girls, you have to wonder if PhD is an acronym for his reaction to that subset of the population.
Matt wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:25 pm
Standing up for the presumed pedo?
Being the subject of ridicule is one thing. But in responding to anything audiophile says, you bring up the same "ridicule" over, and over, and over, and over again. And there's always these sexual pedophile undertones in your comments, particularly given what you already said back in 2021.
I've admitted it's wrong to make that suggestion, even though he hasn't disavowed the creepy bribe for virginity scheme. This seems like a simple thing for him to accomplish. Instead, he deflects. Like you, he turns a blind eye to what an absolute piece of shit Donald Trump is and how he can't be trusted in power. You yourself are running like a coward - presumably, if Kamala wins, you won't post again.
Matt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:29 am
...creepy bribe for virginity scheme...
Do you even realize how loaded of a comment THAT is?
You say it is easy for him to "disavow" it. I have no idea what the origin of this legend is, nor do I really care, but it would be just as easy for you to simply knock it off and not keep bringing it up at every corner. Instead you choose to use suggestive undertone, even still.
Also interesting you keep bring politics into this discussion. Should Christine O'Donnell have disavowed accusations that she was a witch in her now infamous "I'm not a witch" tv commercial?
Matt wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:29 am
...creepy bribe for virginity scheme...
Do you even realize how loaded of a comment THAT is?
You say it is easy for him to "disavow" it. I have no idea what the origin of this legend is, nor do I really care, but it would be just as easy for you to simply knock it off and not keep bringing it up at every corner. Instead you choose to use suggestive undertone, even still.
Also interesting you keep bring politics into this discussion. Should Christine O'Donnell have disavowed accusations that she was a witch in her now infamous "I'm not a witch" tv commercial?
He said a friend had used the scheme and thought it was a great idea. It is disgusting.
Speaking of politics, are you going to disavow your cult leader for calling his opponent "retarded?"
Wait a minute. His comment that started this legend was only that a FRIEND did it, and that he thought it was a good idea? That's a far cry from actually doing it himself (which even then wouldn't be a bribery scheme by any definition of the phrase), which you and others have repeatedly (obsessively) suggested through the years.
If audiophile wishes to chime in here, I'm sure he will. But I'm done. It looks to me like you're as defiant and defensive as ever.
bmw wrote: ↑Sun Oct 13, 2024 10:23 am
Wait a minute. His comment that started this legend was only that a FRIEND did it, and that he thought it was a good idea? That's a far cry from actually doing it himself (which even then wouldn't be a bribery scheme by any definition of the phrase), which you and others have repeatedly (obsessively) suggested through the years.
If audiophile wishes to chime in here, I'm sure he will. But I'm done. It looks to me like you're as defiant and defensive as ever.
You need to look in the mirror when it comes to being defiant and defensive (see your cult membership status). YOU started this dumb thread calling for me to be banned for something that I shouldn't have said and that I've apologized for saying. You've pivoted to whining about me calling our resident Christian Nationalist to the carpet for his inconsistencies. Now, like in the political section, you are running like a COWARD. Time to grow a pair and leave your cult.
