Yet again, MW

[kager]

Allowing the "Pol Pot-ification" of nearly every forum on this board - sted of just in the last two - sure has helped it become what it is today.

[Matt]

Allowing the "Pol Pot-ification" of nearly every forum on this board - sted of just in the last two - sure has helped it become what it is today.

The bigger issue is not addressing ll101.

[Honeyman]

"Sugar" is clearly trying to portray negative African American stereotypes.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black....or in your case, ni--er.

Wow, that's uncalled for.

So you agree someone who posted that without even the dashes should be banned, huh?

First, it was Plastic Pelosi getting her nasty hair done while telling others not to.

Then, that faggot Gov. Newsom in California going to a fundraising party with his lobbyist buddies.

https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... p-analysis

Now, this nigger believes he’s better than you too.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/de ... e-n1249064

When will you wake up?! They are doing whatever they want. You should too.

...lest we forget how horrible a person this is, that remains able to post on this board.

[Matt]

What you wrote is inexcusable.

What you copied and posted is inexcusable.

Your continued diatribe is inexcusable.

Fuck you, cunt.

[Rate This]

What you wrote is inexcusable.

What you copied and posted is inexcusable.

Your continued diatribe is inexcusable.

YOU WROTE IT.

[Rate This]

What you wrote is inexcusable.

What you copied and posted is inexcusable.

Your continued diatribe is inexcusable.

YOU WROTE IT.

Everything you just copied is what I wrote.

What you wrote is inexcusable.

What you copied and posted is inexcusable.

Your continued diatribe is inexcusable.

This is you bud...

First, it was Plastic Pelosi getting her nasty hair done while telling others not to.

Then, that faggot Gov. Newsom in California going to a fundraising party with his lobbyist buddies.

https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... p-analysis

Now, this nigger believes he’s better than you too.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/de ... e-n1249064

When will you wake up?! They are doing whatever they want. You should too.

[Matt]

I know I'm a cunt, but I am shocked that I thought it was acceptable to post that.

[Rate This]

It what universe do you think it is acceptable to post that?

You first... Those are your words.

[Matt]

This version of ll is basically wearing this: https://m.onfancy.com/fuzzy-nose-and-gl ... f_EALw_wcB

[Honeyman]

You all were right, and I was wrong.

Keto posted something last night or this morning about "pedophilia" that made it glaringly obvious this was LL 101 all along.

The main reason I was skeptical for a while is because someone well known in Mid-Michigan television was asked about keto and seemed confident it was not LL 101. Keto also refrained from anti-police posts and racist language.

But, in view of the recent post coupled with closer examination of other info, I was able to comfortably determine it was indeed the same individual who's been banned in the past.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, MW!!!!!!

[bmw]

When in doubt, simply refer to LL101's 10-point manifesto.

Today, I think it's fitting to list all the things we are thankful for.

1. I never had COVID-19 and never will.
2. I never had HIV/AIDS and never will.
3. I am able to reproduce if I want to.
4. My lifestyle is not disgusting, dirty, nor does it use anything involving nor resembling a sewer pipe.
5. I live in reality, where XX and XY determine sex and gender, not feelings.
6. I'm not a pedophile.
7. I don't support a religion that promotes and covers up pedophilia.
8. I'm not a dumb Dem.
9. I don't financially support Netflix, which supports pedophilia (Cuties).
10. I don't support cops because they kill innocent, unarmed, black people, and they suck.

[Matt]

You all were right, and I was wrong.

Keto posted something last night or this morning about "pedophilia" that made it glaringly obvious this was LL 101 all along.

The main reason I was skeptical for a while is because someone well known in Mid-Michigan television was asked about keto and seemed confident it was not LL 101. Keto also refrained from anti-police posts and racist language.

But, in view of the recent post coupled with closer examination of other info, I was able to comfortably determine it was indeed the same individual who's been banned in the past.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, MW!!!!!!

[audiophile]

You all were right, and I was wrong.

Keto posted something last night or this morning about "pedophilia" that made it glaringly obvious this was LL 101 all along.

The main reason I was skeptical for a while is because someone well known in Mid-Michigan television was asked about keto and seemed confident it was not LL 101. Keto also refrained from anti-police posts and racist language.

But, in view of the recent post coupled with closer examination of other info, I was able to comfortably determine it was indeed the same individual who's been banned in the past.

Was it possible LL was a multi-user account (IE shared among employees at a certain TV station).

Whatever the case whoever LL was either had multiple users or multiple personalities!

[Matt]

You all were right, and I was wrong.

Keto posted something last night or this morning about "pedophilia" that made it glaringly obvious this was LL 101 all along.

The main reason I was skeptical for a while is because someone well known in Mid-Michigan television was asked about keto and seemed confident it was not LL 101. Keto also refrained from anti-police posts and racist language.

But, in view of the recent post coupled with closer examination of other info, I was able to comfortably determine it was indeed the same individual who's been banned in the past.

Was it possible LL was a multi-user account (IE shared among employees at a certain TV station).

Whatever the case whoever LL was either had multiple users or multiple personalities!

How brave of you to call him out after he's been booted again.