Acceptable registrations in the queue through September 14 at 6:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7061
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
In a 6-3 vote with the usual CON parties supporting, SCOTUS has said that the EPA has no business regulating power plant emissions. How pro-life of them....
https://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-li ... on-brknews
https://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-li ... on-brknews
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
It's not the Court's fault that the people in power continually try to exercise power they don't have. This is precisely why we have a Supreme Court - to act as a check and balance against abuse of power by other branches of government. If you want the EPA to have the authority to do this, then Congress needs to grant them said authority.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7061
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
I want you to remember this day when the world becomes uninhabitable for your grandchildren. If you voted for Trump, you voted for destruction.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/30/11035958 ... Mk8my2fR4I
We need to expand the court NOW. They aren’t practicing the law, they are playing politics.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/30/11035958 ... Mk8my2fR4I
We need to expand the court NOW. They aren’t practicing the law, they are playing politics.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
Again, over the top hyperbole...MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:42 amI want you to remember this day when the world becomes uninhabitable for your grandchildren. If you voted for Trump, you voted for destruction.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/30/11035958 ... Mk8my2fR4I
We need to expand the court NOW. They aren’t practicing the law, they are playing politics.
SCOTUS isn't supposed to be woke, nor is it supposed to be a policy making entity. The ruling was that the executive branch overreached by issuing edicts through the administrative state, bypassing the legislative branch. Why is it so hard for SOME lefties to understand the separation of powers?
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
- audiophile
- Posts: 9031
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
MCRF should think long and hard that 5 unelected officials of the EPA (or any agency) could create endless regulations.
Supreme Court is correct on this one.
Supreme Court is correct on this one.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13051
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
I agree with the ruling of the Supreme Court on this one.
DTE Energy paid $752 million in dividends to its shareholders last fiscal year. Remember that the next time they ask the MPSC to approve rate hikes.
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
Don't get him excited.audiophile wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 7:00 amMCRF should think long and hard that 5 unelected officials of the EPA (or any agency) could create endless regulations.
Supreme Court is correct on this one.
This is a pro-Harris/Walz account
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
"I have to admit - Matt is right." ~bmw
- craig11152
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
- Location: Ann Arbor
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
The party of Big Government takes another hit.
I no longer directly engage trolls
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
Speaking of over-the-top hyperbole, have you seen some of the mainstream media headlines about the Court's recent rulings?
"The force of the Supreme Court's right turn has shaken the country" (CNN)
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/01/politics ... index.html
First, a few factual corrections. The Supreme Court hasn't taken a "right turn." It has been majority Conservative for as far back as I can remember. Second, its decisions haven't "shaken the country." The decisions have shaken the Democrat party and its voters, but not the entire country.The Supreme Court reached into every corner of American life, reordering intimate family choices, breaching the separation of church and state, and diminishing the steps government can take to prevent gun violence or protect the environment.
Moreover, where was CNN when many local governments were reaching into every corner of American life in 2020, shutting down businesses, banning First-Amendment-protected gatherings (including shutting down churches, so much for separation of church and state, eh?), completely wreaking havoc with children's education, etc.? Oh, that's right. They were cheerleading each and every one of those decisions every step of the way, often urging the the government to do even more.
- audiophile
- Posts: 9031
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
You so are correct, BMW.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7061
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
All I seen in this thread is gaslighting.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7061
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
The judicial branch has no power over the EPA. The executive branch sets policy. The judicial branch settles lawsuits. Why is that so hard for righties to understand? When you retake the White House with Death Santis, then you set policy with the EPA. This isn’t hard.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 6:05 amAgain, over the top hyperbole...MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:42 amI want you to remember this day when the world becomes uninhabitable for your grandchildren. If you voted for Trump, you voted for destruction.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/30/11035958 ... Mk8my2fR4I
We need to expand the court NOW. They aren’t practicing the law, they are playing politics.
SCOTUS isn't supposed to be woke, nor is it supposed to be a policy making entity. The ruling was that the executive branch overreached by issuing edicts through the administrative state, bypassing the legislative branch. Why is it so hard for SOME lefties to understand the separation of powers?
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 7061
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
You stupid fucks stole Merrick Garland’s seat and we will never let you forget about it. Fuck the GOP.bmw wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:13 amSpeaking of over-the-top hyperbole, have you seen some of the mainstream media headlines about the Court's recent rulings?
"The force of the Supreme Court's right turn has shaken the country" (CNN)
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/01/politics ... index.html
First, a few factual corrections. The Supreme Court hasn't taken a "right turn." It has been majority Conservative for as far back as I can remember. Second, its decisions haven't "shaken the country." The decisions have shaken the Democrat party and its voters, but not the entire country.The Supreme Court reached into every corner of American life, reordering intimate family choices, breaching the separation of church and state, and diminishing the steps government can take to prevent gun violence or protect the environment.
Moreover, where was CNN when many local governments were reaching into every corner of American life in 2020, shutting down businesses, banning First-Amendment-protected gatherings (including shutting down churches, so much for separation of church and state, eh?), completely wreaking havoc with children's education, etc.? Oh, that's right. They were cheerleading each and every one of those decisions every step of the way, often urging the the government to do even more.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
- audiophile
- Posts: 9031
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
6-3 VS 5-4, EPA still would lose.
I actually felt sorry for Merrick, but after I see him in action as AG, he is unfit.
I actually felt sorry for Merrick, but after I see him in action as AG, he is unfit.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- audiophile
- Posts: 9031
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: SCOTUS: We're Cool with Global Warming/Climate Change
This is wrong. A lawsuit was brought against the EPA.MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:54 pmThe judicial branch has no power over the EPA. The executive branch sets policy. The judicial branch settles lawsuits. Why is that so hard for righties to understand? When you retake the White House with Death Santis, then you set policy with the EPA. This isn’t hard.Matt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 6:05 amAgain, over the top hyperbole...MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:42 amI want you to remember this day when the world becomes uninhabitable for your grandchildren. If you voted for Trump, you voted for destruction.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/30/11035958 ... Mk8my2fR4I
We need to expand the court NOW. They aren’t practicing the law, they are playing politics.
SCOTUS isn't supposed to be woke, nor is it supposed to be a policy making entity. The ruling was that the executive branch overreached by issuing edicts through the administrative state, bypassing the legislative branch. Why is it so hard for SOME lefties to understand the separation of powers?
Maybe you heard about redress of grievances about the government?
https://redressgrievance.org/the-us-constitution
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!