The hypocrisy of dealing with unborn children

[Bidengirl]

So, when a cop's ignorance causes an accident that kills an unborn child, that cop is charged.

https://www.wnem.com/news/state-trooper ... af5cb.html

But when a doctor and a woman commit murder, you are march in the streets to "keep it legal."

[Bidengirl]

At some point they're going to have to land on one side of the fence or another. Either the unborn baby is a person wothry of protection and rights or it is just a collection of cells.

We're all collections of cells and persons.

We all have about 15 trillion cells. That "collection" is a person.

[Bidengirl]

At some point they're going to have to land on one side of the fence or another. Either the unborn baby is a person wothry of protection and rights or it is just a collection of cells.

If all people are equal, and it's immoral to kill any of them, where will the democrats go to escape consequences?

[Bidengirl]

At some point they're going to have to land on one side of the fence or another. Either the unborn baby is a person worthy of protection and rights or it is just a collection of cells.

We're all collections of cells and persons.

We all have about 15 trillion cells. That "collection" is a person.

Not every "collection of cells" is a person. Some "collections of cells" are plants, some are animals.

At some point, the "collection of cells" in a womb turns into a person. The debate is if that starts at conception, prior to conception, or after birth.

Going back to the original post, if the local prosecutor in the case is going to charge the trooper with harming that "collection of cells" then they need to be consistent with other cases where harming similar "collections of cells" happens.

It’s always human. There’s no disputing that.

It’s not a plant or animal.

[Bidengirl]

At some point they're going to have to land on one side of the fence or another. Either the unborn baby is a person worthy of protection and rights or it is just a collection of cells.

We're all collections of cells and persons.

We all have about 15 trillion cells. That "collection" is a person.

Not every "collection of cells" is a person. Some "collections of cells" are plants, some are animals.

At some point, the "collection of cells" in a womb turns into a person. The debate is if that starts at conception, prior to conception, or after birth.

Going back to the original post, if the local prosecutor in the case is going to charge the trooper with harming that "collection of cells" then they need to be consistent with other cases where harming similar "collections of cells" happens.

It’s always human. There’s no disputing that.

It’s not a plant or animal.

It’s most certainly an animal. Human arrogance separates us out but that’s not reality.

Feel free to continue acting like an animal.

[km1125]

At some point they're going to have to land on one side of the fence or another. Either the unborn baby is a person worthy of protection and rights or it is just a collection of cells.

We're all collections of cells and persons.

We all have about 15 trillion cells. That "collection" is a person.

Not every "collection of cells" is a person. Some "collections of cells" are plants, some are animals.

At some point, the "collection of cells" in a womb turns into a person. The debate is if that starts at conception, prior to conception, or after birth.

Going back to the original post, if the local prosecutor in the case is going to charge the trooper with harming that "collection of cells" then they need to be consistent with other cases where harming similar "collections of cells" happens.

It’s always human. There’s no disputing that.

It’s not a plant or animal.

Yes, those cells are human, but perhaps not a person. I shed cells every day. If you scooped up all the cells I've shed you'd have a "collection of cells" that are certainly human but in no way, shape, or form are a "person".