Selling Ugly Sweaters

[MrReason]

The inmates are running the asylum.

"Talent" knows how difficult it is for management to get someone to work for such a low wage (not underpaid, just low).

They are trying to get away with as much as they can for their own gain like selling their own products, violating conflict of interests, and doing only positive stories on police.

[MrReason]

It seems either David Custer isn’t making enough money and needs a side job or his ego is out of control where he thinks we all need to dress up like him...

https://www.ftvlive.com/sqsp-test/2020/ ... dith-thing

Why disrespect them with the term of "ugly" sweaters. Let's just call them what they are: gay.

[MrReason]

Nice. Got any other clever terms that turn sexual orientation, gender or race into derisive words?

For most of human history, “gay” meant “lighthearted and carefree.” That’s what these sweaters are.

It’s only been in the last few decades that the term “gay” has been hijacked. What you are describing, at least when it comes to sexual choices, is “homosexual.”

Why you brought up “sexual orientation” (which doesn’t exist), gender(which does exist as XX or XY), and race (which, like gender, is truly what you are born with) for the word “gay” is ignorant. What does race have to do with being lighthearted and carefree or sweaters? Isn’t that stereotyping? Yes.

“Sexual orientation” doesn’t exist. People have sex with those they choose to have sex with. Men to women, men to men, women to women, or the really desperate men and women.

For some, who they have sex with is not a choice. That’s called rape and/or pedophilia. See the Catholic Church.

Now, make it a great day!

[MrReason]

Wow. What's it like going to school with other polio kids? 1952 much?

Bet you can't wait til color TV comes in your neighborhood. That's at least 10 years ahead of you "Reason."

I'll leave it up to you to report to us on Charlie Chaplin trying to get back into the USA, as it appears to be right up your alley... same exact mentality.

Your logical fallacy here is ad hominem. You attack the person rather than produce any kind of intelligent argument. It’s cheap, lazy, and ignorant.

Show me anywhere factually where I am incorrect in my statement.

I’ll save you the time. I’m not.

[MrReason]

Wow. What's it like going to school with other polio kids? 1952 much?

Bet you can't wait til color TV comes in your neighborhood. That's at least 10 years ahead of you "Reason."

I'll leave it up to you to report to us on Charlie Chaplin trying to get back into the USA, as it appears to be right up your alley... same exact mentality.

Your logical fallacy here is ad hominem. You attack the person rather than produce any kind of intelligent argument. It’s cheap, lazy, and ignorant.

Show me anywhere factually where I am incorrect in my statement.

I’ll save you the time. I’m not.

Your a biggot. And your stance/flawed thinking is what I was talking about.

And no reason to duplicate with another name 101.

It’s “you’re.”

And you’re still talking as hominem, son.

[MrReason]

Yep. "Son" is LL101, or the many names "it" uses. Confirmed 2 ways. No denial of not being LL101... and former syntax used. Now if I was hominem, I would be attacking you as a bad person. But you just did that to yourself. You just did not see it. Read my signature, as it also can refer personality and other traits as a human. Now go have that pity party Lovinlife 101 or whatever name you chose for attention seeking. Blocked!

It’s “ad hominem.” Not just “hominem,” son.

[MrReason]

Nice. Got any other clever terms that turn sexual orientation, gender or race into derisive words?

For most of human history, “gay” meant “lighthearted and carefree.” That’s what these sweaters are.

It’s only been in the last few decades that the term “gay” has been hijacked. What you are describing, at least when it comes to sexual choices, is “homosexual.”

Why you brought up “sexual orientation” (which doesn’t exist), gender(which does exist as XX or XY), and race (which, like gender, is truly what you are born with) for the word “gay” is ignorant. What does race have to do with being lighthearted and carefree or sweaters? Isn’t that stereotyping? Yes.

“Sexual orientation” doesn’t exist. People have sex with those they choose to have sex with. Men to women, men to men, women to women, or the really desperate men and women.

For some, who they have sex with is not a choice. That’s called rape and/or pedophilia. See the Catholic Church.

Now, make it a great day!

1. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any material that may violate common law or statutory law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed necessary at the discretion of the Administrator. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.

[/quote]

I agreed to those terms and am 100% consistent.

Now, you on the other hand...