Rate This wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 2:50 am
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 12:09 am
Whitmer doesn't want it. I truly think she wants to stay and fix things here.
That said, Granholm is a bad pick. We had a one state recession because of her.
We had a one state recession because of normalized trade relations from China
So Michigan's recession was Bill Clinton's fault?
During her terms, Michigan’s GDP growth was "worst in the nation" according to PolitiFact. While Granholm tried to attribute her state’s dismal growth to cuts in the state budget, PolitiFact said, "They weren’t the primary cause of the state’s poor economic performance."
Citing economic analyst Patrick Anderson of East Lansing, PolitiFact said "Long-term troubles in the automotive industry, the national recession and raising taxes on businesses and individuals ‘were all partially to blame.’"
Granholm actually presided over the "highest tax increases in the history of Michigan," Idaho representative Raul Labrador said during a debate with Granholm, a statement that PolitiFact, not known for its favorable treatment of Republicans, did not dispute.
I sure hope her "green energy' initiatives work out a WHOLE lot better than her "green energy" plan at the old Ford Wixom plant. What she touted as a hub for green energy, arraigned federal loans and tax breaks for, with the promise of 2,800 new and high paying jobs, is now a General RV and a Menards...
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
