Gun rights rally, no violence

[lovinlife101]

Surprise, surprise!

No violence!

I’M SHOCKED!!!!!

[lovinlife101]

I stand by my original statement.

[lovinlife101]

I stand by my original statement.

So you are shocked that there wasn’t violence... got it. Me too.

My original comment was facetious (look it up).

[lovinlife101]

Thousands of people with guns, no incidents.

The gooberner wanted to make it a “gun free” zone during the demonstration. They gave the goober a big F-U!!!! Nothing happened.

Meanwhile, in “gun free” Chicago, three people shot to death, 13 others injured by gun violence. https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/3 ... o/2203780/

[lovinlife101]

Big long guns.

Small short members.

You would know. The men use you as a gauge.

[lovinlife101]

I need an explanation why so many of the folks who were passionate about gun rights showed up in "costume".
I'm not critiquing what they stand for.
But was the paratrooper, dressed to the hilt show really necessary?
Kind of takes the "take me seriously" off the table, if you ask me anyway.

People are allowed to wear whatever they want. Sorry you don’t approve.

[lovinlife101]

I need an explanation why so many of the folks who were passionate about gun rights showed up in "costume".
I'm not critiquing what they stand for.
But was the paratrooper, dressed to the hilt show really necessary?
Kind of takes the "take me seriously" off the table, if you ask me anyway.

Those people are presumably ready to roll into battle at the drop of a hat if their rights are supposedly infringed...

I hope so!

That’s literally what happened during the Revolutionary War.

[lovinlife101]

I need an explanation why so many of the folks who were passionate about gun rights showed up in "costume".
I'm not critiquing what they stand for.
But was the paratrooper, dressed to the hilt show really necessary?
Kind of takes the "take me seriously" off the table, if you ask me anyway.

Those people are presumably ready to roll into battle at the drop of a hat if their rights are supposedly infringed...

I hope so!

That’s literally what happened during the Revolutionary War.

That would be grossly out of proportion with some benign rules... how do those rules even harm anyone?

Any restriction on the second amendment is just as unconstitutional as any restriction on the first amendment.

Your threshold for whether a law should be made is based on whether the rule “hurts” someone? Glad you weren’t at the constitutional convention. You would have sided with England.

[lovinlife101]

I need an explanation why so many of the folks who were passionate about gun rights showed up in "costume".
I'm not critiquing what they stand for.
But was the paratrooper, dressed to the hilt show really necessary?
Kind of takes the "take me seriously" off the table, if you ask me anyway.

Those people are presumably ready to roll into battle at the drop of a hat if their rights are supposedly infringed...

I hope so!

That’s literally what happened during the Revolutionary War.

That would be grossly out of proportion with some benign rules... how do those rules even harm anyone?

Any restriction on the second amendment is just as unconstitutional as any restriction on the first amendment.

Your threshold for whether a law should be made is based on whether the rule “hurts” someone? Glad you weren’t at the constitutional convention. You would have sided with England.

Infringement of The right to bear arms is “you may not have guns, sorry”.

A law to limit the number purchased in a month or to take them away from those who may imminently use them to kill people don’t meet that threshold.

100% wrong.

The constitution protects people’s right to bear arms from being “infringed.” Infringement is a much lesser threshold than “regulated, “limited,” or “banned.”

Infringement is NOT taking away all guns like you say. It’s any limit on the right to have any kind and as many as you decide.

Your logic would say that infringement on free speech would be “you can’t speak at all.” Rather, limiting any speech is a violation of the first amendment just like limiting any guns is a violation of the second amendment.

Just because you don’t like something or are scared of it doesn’t justify limiting or banning it for others.

[lovinlife101]

I need an explanation why so many of the folks who were passionate about gun rights showed up in "costume".
I'm not critiquing what they stand for.
But was the paratrooper, dressed to the hilt show really necessary?
Kind of takes the "take me seriously" off the table, if you ask me anyway.

Those people are presumably ready to roll into battle at the drop of a hat if their rights are supposedly infringed...

I hope so!

That’s literally what happened during the Revolutionary War.

That would be grossly out of proportion with some benign rules... how do those rules even harm anyone?

Any restriction on the second amendment is just as unconstitutional as any restriction on the first amendment.

Your threshold for whether a law should be made is based on whether the rule “hurts” someone? Glad you weren’t at the constitutional convention. You would have sided with England.

Infringement of The right to bear arms is “you may not have guns, sorry”.

A law to limit the number purchased in a month or to take them away from those who may imminently use them to kill people don’t meet that threshold.

100% wrong.

The constitution protects people’s right to bear arms from being “infringed.” Infringement is a much lesser threshold than “regulated, “limited,” or “banned.”

Infringement is NOT taking away all guns like you say. It’s any limit on the right to have any kind and as many as you decide.

Your logic would say that infringement on free speech would be “you can’t speak at all.” Rather, limiting any speech is a violation of the first amendment just like limiting any guns is a violation of the second amendment.

Just because you don’t like something or are scared of it doesn’t justify limiting or banning it for others.

If I remember right two courts (one might have been SCOTUS) upheld Virginia’s state capital grounds Gun ban before the rally so it’s not nearly as black and white as you want it to be.

Any reason for capitalizing “Gun”?

[lovinlife101]

I need an explanation why so many of the folks who were passionate about gun rights showed up in "costume".
I'm not critiquing what they stand for.
But was the paratrooper, dressed to the hilt show really necessary?
Kind of takes the "take me seriously" off the table, if you ask me anyway.

Those people are presumably ready to roll into battle at the drop of a hat if their rights are supposedly infringed...

I hope so!

That’s literally what happened during the Revolutionary War.

That would be grossly out of proportion with some benign rules... how do those rules even harm anyone?

Any restriction on the second amendment is just as unconstitutional as any restriction on the first amendment.

Your threshold for whether a law should be made is based on whether the rule “hurts” someone? Glad you weren’t at the constitutional convention. You would have sided with England.

Infringement of The right to bear arms is “you may not have guns, sorry”.

A law to limit the number purchased in a month or to take them away from those who may imminently use them to kill people don’t meet that threshold.

100% wrong.

The constitution protects people’s right to bear arms from being “infringed.” Infringement is a much lesser threshold than “regulated, “limited,” or “banned.”

Infringement is NOT taking away all guns like you say. It’s any limit on the right to have any kind and as many as you decide.

Your logic would say that infringement on free speech would be “you can’t speak at all.” Rather, limiting any speech is a violation of the first amendment just like limiting any guns is a violation of the second amendment.

Just because you don’t like something or are scared of it doesn’t justify limiting or banning it for others.

If I remember right two courts (one might have been SCOTUS) upheld Virginia’s state capital grounds Gun ban before the rally so it’s not nearly as black and white as you want it to be.

Any reason for capitalizing “Gun”?

Spell check is a funny thing... I probably tapped the capitalize and didn’t catch it... oh well.

Don’t worry. You’re only wrong about words, thoughts, ideas, beliefs, and life. No big deal.

[lovinlife101]

I need an explanation why so many of the folks who were passionate about gun rights showed up in "costume".
I'm not critiquing what they stand for.
But was the paratrooper, dressed to the hilt show really necessary?
Kind of takes the "take me seriously" off the table, if you ask me anyway.

Those people are presumably ready to roll into battle at the drop of a hat if their rights are supposedly infringed...

I hope so!

That’s literally what happened during the Revolutionary War.

That would be grossly out of proportion with some benign rules... how do those rules even harm anyone?

Any restriction on the second amendment is just as unconstitutional as any restriction on the first amendment.

Your threshold for whether a law should be made is based on whether the rule “hurts” someone? Glad you weren’t at the constitutional convention. You would have sided with England.

Infringement of The right to bear arms is “you may not have guns, sorry”.

A law to limit the number purchased in a month or to take them away from those who may imminently use them to kill people don’t meet that threshold.

100% wrong.

The constitution protects people’s right to bear arms from being “infringed.” Infringement is a much lesser threshold than “regulated, “limited,” or “banned.”

Infringement is NOT taking away all guns like you say. It’s any limit on the right to have any kind and as many as you decide.

Your logic would say that infringement on free speech would be “you can’t speak at all.” Rather, limiting any speech is a violation of the first amendment just like limiting any guns is a violation of the second amendment.

Just because you don’t like something or are scared of it doesn’t justify limiting or banning it for others.

If I remember right two courts (one might have been SCOTUS) upheld Virginia’s state capital grounds Gun ban before the rally so it’s not nearly as black and white as you want it to be.

Any reason for capitalizing “Gun”?

Spell check is a funny thing... I probably tapped the capitalize and didn’t catch it... oh well.

Don’t worry. You’re only wrong about words, thoughts, ideas, beliefs, and life. No big deal.

You are deeply troubled.

Nope!

You’re only 100% wrong about that too!!!