Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
The impeachment/indictment thread
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
To bad a sitting president can't be indicted...
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/f ... 0222_0.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/f ... 0222_0.pdf
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
Really?
The Constitution provides, in express terms, that the President, as well as the Vice-President and all civil officers, may be impeached for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” It was framed by men who had learned to their sorrow the falsity of the English maxim, that “the king can do no wrong,” and established by the people, who meant to hold all their public servants, the highest and the lowest, to the strictest accountability. All were jealous of any “squinting towards monarchy,” and determined to allow to the chief magistrate no sort of regal immunity, but to secure his faithfulness and their own rights by holding him personally answerable for his misconduct, and to protect the government by making adequate provision for his removal. Moreover, they did not mean that the door should not be locked till after the horse had been stolen.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
Impeachment is political. A indictment is a criminal matter. While congress can impeach, a prosecutor cannot indict. At least according to the DOJ in the PDF I linked to.TC Talks wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:44 pmReally?
The Constitution provides, in express terms, that the President, as well as the Vice-President and all civil officers, may be impeached for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” It was framed by men who had learned to their sorrow the falsity of the English maxim, that “the king can do no wrong,” and established by the people, who meant to hold all their public servants, the highest and the lowest, to the strictest accountability. All were jealous of any “squinting towards monarchy,” and determined to allow to the chief magistrate no sort of regal immunity, but to secure his faithfulness and their own rights by holding him personally answerable for his misconduct, and to protect the government by making adequate provision for his removal. Moreover, they did not mean that the door should not be locked till after the horse had been stolen.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
1.) Trump did nothing wrong
2.) Trump HIMSELF did nothing wrong
3.) Clintons
4.) Even if something went down, Trump had nothing to do with it
5.) Even if Trump had something to do with it, it's not a crime
6.) Obama
7.) Trump did something wrong but it wasn't anything major
8.) Fuck it, he did it...what are you gonna do about it?
9.) Yeah, he did it, and you can't touch him!
2.) Trump HIMSELF did nothing wrong
3.) Clintons
4.) Even if something went down, Trump had nothing to do with it
5.) Even if Trump had something to do with it, it's not a crime
6.) Obama
7.) Trump did something wrong but it wasn't anything major
8.) Fuck it, he did it...what are you gonna do about it?
9.) Yeah, he did it, and you can't touch him!
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop
-TurkeyTop
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
That's all great...Mega Hertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 2:40 pm1.) Trump did nothing wrong
2.) Trump HIMSELF did nothing wrong
3.) Clintons
4.) Even if something went down, Trump had nothing to do with it
5.) Even if Trump had something to do with it, it's not a crime
6.) Obama
7.) Trump did something wrong but it wasn't anything major
8.) Fuck it, he did it...what are you gonna do about it?
9.) Yeah, he did it, and you can't touch him!
but...
after two years and millions of dollars, a special council and his minions along with pretty much every media outlet working diligently to find something T Rump did illegal...
Nothing,...
The best they can do is trick people into lying to the FBI and charging them with a process crime.
And the search goes on...
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
I'm assuming that's a typo and you really meant Too bad. Not sure how to interpret that. Do you mean it's regrettable to you that the President can't be indicted? Or do you mean that it's too bad for his critics and very fortunate for the President that he can't be indicted?
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
-
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
Duly noted for the next time the Clinton Foundation or Benghazi is brought up.Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 3:51 pmThat's all great...Mega Hertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 2:40 pm1.) Trump did nothing wrong
2.) Trump HIMSELF did nothing wrong
3.) Clintons
4.) Even if something went down, Trump had nothing to do with it
5.) Even if Trump had something to do with it, it's not a crime
6.) Obama
7.) Trump did something wrong but it wasn't anything major
8.) Fuck it, he did it...what are you gonna do about it?
9.) Yeah, he did it, and you can't touch him!
but...
after two years and millions of dollars, a special council and his minions along with pretty much every media outlet working diligently to find something T Rump did illegal...
Nothing,...
The best they can do is trick people into lying to the FBI and charging them with a process crime.
And the search goes on...
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop
-TurkeyTop
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think either of those incidents had a special council looking into them for two years.Mega Hertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 3:59 pmDuly noted for the next time the Clinton Foundation or Benghazi is brought up.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
Yes, too would be correct. The statement was meant to be open for interpretation. At this point, I'm ambivalent.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 3:56 pmI'm assuming that's a typo and you really meant Too bad. Not sure how to interpret that. Do you mean it's regrettable to you that the President can't be indicted? Or do you mean that it's too bad for his critics and very fortunate for the President that he can't be indicted?
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
So you're willing to put that to bed and admit no wrongdoing? And not call for any further investigations of either?Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 4:25 pmCorrect me if I'm wrong, but I don't think either of those incidents had a special council looking into them for two years.Mega Hertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 3:59 pmDuly noted for the next time the Clinton Foundation or Benghazi is brought up.
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop
-TurkeyTop
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
Sure would be interesting to see what would have happened if they had a special council investigating those for two years. At this point, put it to bed. But, put the T Rump thing to bed too.Mega Hertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 4:31 pmSo you're willing to put that to bed and admit no wrongdoing? And not call for any further investigations of either?Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 4:25 pmCorrect me if I'm wrong, but I don't think either of those incidents had a special council looking into them for two years.Mega Hertz wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 3:59 pmDuly noted for the next time the Clinton Foundation or Benghazi is brought up.
However, I would like to see a special council appointed for the Uranium One deal.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
I foresee the Senate pressuring him to resign and if he refuses, move towards impeachment. If not I will take satisfaction in watching the Senate move to Blue. Americans don't have patience for treasonous actions.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
TC Talks, Lester, and Screen Glare - you losing hope yet in regards to your predictions just a few months ago that the Mueller Report will effectively end the Trump Presidency? Your ship is sinking, fast.
- Lester The Nightfly
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:19 pm
Re: The impeachment/indictment thread
How is it sinking? Even Trumps own legal team believes the report will be devestating...