Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
John Miller
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:50 pm
John Miller
This is hilarious!
And yet not surprising.
Trump caught on tape talking in third person about himself using the pseudonym "John Miller."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
To anyone in the media that's ever dealt with "celebrities" looking to build or sustain their fame this sophomoric behavior is very familiar.
And yet not surprising.
Trump caught on tape talking in third person about himself using the pseudonym "John Miller."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
To anyone in the media that's ever dealt with "celebrities" looking to build or sustain their fame this sophomoric behavior is very familiar.
Last edited by JackAttack FM on Sat May 14, 2016 9:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8660
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: John Miller
This is would be very funny if he wasn't running for president.
If he told his branch trumpians to jump off a bridge they would...nuts!
If he told his branch trumpians to jump off a bridge they would...nuts!
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12346
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: John Miller
It is undoubtedly Trump on the recording. The guy is a Grade A creep, and chances are quite high that Trump himself leaked those recordings.
Here's another article about Trump's antics:
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politic ... /84371956/
What a pervert...reminds me of Bill Clinton.
What an election! Our choices are likely going to be a socialist-lite/crony capitalist (H. Clinton), an eccentric pervert weirdo (Trump), and perhaps a neo-con independent candidate TBD.
Here's another article about Trump's antics:
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politic ... /84371956/
What a pervert...reminds me of Bill Clinton.
What an election! Our choices are likely going to be a socialist-lite/crony capitalist (H. Clinton), an eccentric pervert weirdo (Trump), and perhaps a neo-con independent candidate TBD.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
Re: John Miller
3 years I recently heard it compared to are 1896, 1932 and 1960. The 1896 one is notable for having a bizarrely mirror image electoral map...MWmetalhead wrote:It is undoubtedly Trump on the recording. The guy is a Grade A creep, and chances are quite high that Trump himself leaked those recordings.
Here's another article about Trump's antics:
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politic ... /84371956/
What a pervert...reminds me of Bill Clinton.
What an election! Our choices are likely going to be a socialist-lite/crony capitalist (H. Clinton), an eccentric pervert weirdo (Trump), and perhaps a neo-con independent candidate TBD.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_ ... tion,_1896
The red and blue are almost literally the opposite of what they are today...
- audiophile
- Posts: 8660
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: John Miller
Another piece on Trump lyin':
http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/201 ... hn-miller/
http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/201 ... hn-miller/
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12346
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: John Miller
It's pretty amazing that out of a field that started with 17 candidates, no one was capable of taking down the lying, scuzzy weirdo known as Agent Orange.
This shows that message is far more important than anything else, and it also shows how tone-deaf the other candidates are vis-à-vis the priorities of the general public:
--They hate our international trade deals and view them as a key reason the Middle Class is shrinking and wages are stagnant
--They hate reckless spending on foreign conflicts
--They hate unchecked illegal immigration due to the risks it poses to working class wages, our general economy, and our national security
--They hate tax policies that are unbalanced and heavily tilted toward certain special interest groups or voter blocs
--Many are worried about edicts or new laws coming from Washington, DC (whether through executive order or judicial rulings) that infringe personal liberties
I predicted many years ago (toward the end of W's presidency) that there would be a chasm within the Republican party, with illegal immigration and trade serving as the primary fault lines. Not long after I made that prediction, we saw the rise of various "tea party" groups across the country - although such groups are more preoccupied with the overall size & reach of the federal government as opposed to any one specific issue. Now, with Trump (of all people) we are seeing that earlier prediction of mine finally come true, albeit far later than I initially expected.
This shows that message is far more important than anything else, and it also shows how tone-deaf the other candidates are vis-à-vis the priorities of the general public:
--They hate our international trade deals and view them as a key reason the Middle Class is shrinking and wages are stagnant
--They hate reckless spending on foreign conflicts
--They hate unchecked illegal immigration due to the risks it poses to working class wages, our general economy, and our national security
--They hate tax policies that are unbalanced and heavily tilted toward certain special interest groups or voter blocs
--Many are worried about edicts or new laws coming from Washington, DC (whether through executive order or judicial rulings) that infringe personal liberties
I predicted many years ago (toward the end of W's presidency) that there would be a chasm within the Republican party, with illegal immigration and trade serving as the primary fault lines. Not long after I made that prediction, we saw the rise of various "tea party" groups across the country - although such groups are more preoccupied with the overall size & reach of the federal government as opposed to any one specific issue. Now, with Trump (of all people) we are seeing that earlier prediction of mine finally come true, albeit far later than I initially expected.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
Re: John Miller
The other 16 regular politicians were largely following party orthodoxy which says that illegal immigration to drive wages down is good and cutting taxes for the wealthy is good. They don't actually care about the working class at all. It's a wonder to me how they got so many suckers to become Republicans when the party has never had their interests in mind.MWmetalhead wrote:It's pretty amazing that out of a field that started with 17 candidates, no one was capable of taking down the lying, scuzzy weirdo known as Agent Orange.
This shows that message is far more important than anything else, and it also shows how tone-deaf the other candidates are vis-à-vis the priorities of the general public:
--They hate our international trade deals and view them as a key reason the Middle Class is shrinking and wages are stagnant
--They hate reckless spending on foreign conflicts
--They hate unchecked illegal immigration due to the risks it poses to working class wages, our general economy, and our national security
--They hate tax policies that are unbalanced and heavily tilted toward certain special interest groups or voter blocs
--Many are worried about edicts or new laws coming from Washington, DC (whether through executive order or judicial rulings) that infringe personal liberties
I predicted many years ago (toward the end of W's presidency) that there would be a chasm within the Republican party, with illegal immigration and trade serving as the primary fault lines. Not long after I made that prediction, we saw the rise of various "tea party" groups across the country - although such groups are more preoccupied with the overall size & reach of the federal government as opposed to any one specific issue. Now, with Trump (of all people) we are seeing that earlier prediction of mine finally come true, albeit far later than I initially expected.
The party has a say one thing to get the regular folks to vote and then promise the reality those same folks would revolt against to the donors. That's why they keep promising things that never happen especially on social issues.
Re: John Miller
Excellent synopsis!MWmetalhead wrote:It's pretty amazing that out of a field that started with 17 candidates, no one was capable of taking down the lying, scuzzy weirdo known as Agent Orange.
This shows that message is far more important than anything else, and it also shows how tone-deaf the other candidates are vis-à-vis the priorities of the general public:
--They hate our international trade deals and view them as a key reason the Middle Class is shrinking and wages are stagnant
--They hate reckless spending on foreign conflicts
--They hate unchecked illegal immigration due to the risks it poses to working class wages, our general economy, and our national security
--They hate tax policies that are unbalanced and heavily tilted toward certain special interest groups or voter blocs
--Many are worried about edicts or new laws coming from Washington, DC (whether through executive order or judicial rulings) that infringe personal liberties
I predicted many years ago (toward the end of W's presidency) that there would be a chasm within the Republican party, with illegal immigration and trade serving as the primary fault lines. Not long after I made that prediction, we saw the rise of various "tea party" groups across the country - although such groups are more preoccupied with the overall size & reach of the federal government as opposed to any one specific issue. Now, with Trump (of all people) we are seeing that earlier prediction of mine finally come true, albeit far later than I initially expected.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: John Miller
NS8401 wrote: cutting taxes for the wealthy is good.
Care to explain just how you cut taxes for the wealthy only? If you do a rate cut, yeah, wealthy folks have their tax rates lower, but so does everyone else that pays taxes.
Currently 45% of Americans pay NO federal income tax. Granted, it's pretty tough to give those folks a tax cut when they don't pay any taxes. A tax cut benefits those that do. Some of them are rich.
I for one don't buy the tax cuts for the rich talking point. It's bullshit.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: John Miller
So you can't reduce the rate for the wealthy to say 37% from 39% and leave everything else alone? Do tell...Bryce wrote:NS8401 wrote: cutting taxes for the wealthy is good.
Care to explain just how you cut taxes for the wealthy only? If you do a rate cut, yeah, wealthy folks have their tax rates lower, but so does everyone else that pays taxes.
Currently 45% of Americans pay NO federal income tax. Granted, it's pretty tough to give those folks a tax cut when they don't pay any taxes. A tax cut benefits those that do. Some of them are rich.
I for one don't buy the tax cuts for the rich talking point. It's bullshit.
Re: John Miller
IF they can repatriate the 3 trillion dollars that are stuck overseas, our only problem will be filling all of the jobs AND keeping inflation at bay. The economy would rock and DC would be swimming in cash.
Re: John Miller
Your guy is mentally unstable. How can you support that no character hack?jry wrote:IF they can repatriate the 3 trillion dollars that are stuck overseas, our only problem will be filling all of the jobs AND keeping inflation at bay. The economy would rock and DC would be swimming in cash.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: John Miller
That tasty populism is an addicting swill...Matt wrote:Your guy is mentally unstable. How can you support that no character hack?jry wrote:IF they can repatriate the 3 trillion dollars that are stuck overseas, our only problem will be filling all of the jobs AND keeping inflation at bay. The economy would rock and DC would be swimming in cash.
Re: John Miller
Funny guys.
The idea of bringing back all of that investment capital is not swill. It's economics. Something that i understand.
The idea of bringing back all of that investment capital is not swill. It's economics. Something that i understand.
Re: John Miller
You can't bring it back. It's gone. Period. Finito. Trumps protectionist tariffs and levies against those that "cheat us" display a profound lack of understanding of economics and would cause a catastrophic depression almost overnight.jry wrote:Funny guys.
The idea of bringing back all of that investment capital is not swill. It's economics. Something that i understand.
You can't force these jobs to come back at gunpoint.