Acceptable registrations in the queue through April 26 at 9:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Union Time

Discussion pertaining to the Tri-Cities, Flint, Mt. Pleasant, and Bad Axe
sinklair
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:59 am

Re: Union Time

Post by sinklair » Sun Apr 02, 2023 9:04 pm

M60: I no longer work at 25-66. But if I had to pay union dues to force management to negotiate with the labor force — as opposed to what happened — yes, absolutely. It would be worth the cost considering everyone who was laid off, the worsening work conditions, and the least amount of local news being provided in the station’s recent history. Yes, most of the remaining workers would probably sign up in a heartbeat for fair representation.



sinklair
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:59 am

Re: Union Time

Post by sinklair » Sun Apr 02, 2023 9:52 pm

They probably did save more jobs than Sinclair cast off recently…

Deleted User 15555

Re: Union Time

Post by Deleted User 15555 » Tue Apr 04, 2023 2:20 pm

The union saved many of our jobs at 5 at the start of the pandemic while the rest of Meredith suffered pay cuts.

Soundchaser
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:01 pm

Re: Union Time

Post by Soundchaser » Tue Apr 04, 2023 3:24 pm

BehindTheScenes wrote:
Tue Apr 04, 2023 2:20 pm
The union saved many of our jobs at 5 at the start of the pandemic while the rest of Meredith suffered pay cuts.
How may jobs did they save after 5 started being hubbed in Atlanta?
Or when 12 was hubbed out of Ohio?
Same Union.

Soundchaser
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:01 pm

Re: Union Time

Post by Soundchaser » Tue Apr 04, 2023 3:32 pm

keto wrote:
Sun Apr 02, 2023 9:11 pm
sinklair wrote:
Sun Apr 02, 2023 9:04 pm
M60: I no longer work at 25-66. But if I had to pay union dues to force management to negotiate with the labor force — as opposed to what happened — yes, absolutely. It would be worth the cost considering everyone who was laid off, the worsening work conditions, and the least amount of local news being provided in the station’s recent history. Yes, most of the remaining workers would probably sign up in a heartbeat for fair representation.
Because the union spared so many jobs over the years, right?
NABET couldn't save jobs at 12. After every sale 12 lost jobs from their unit. They had a layoff clause that really only benefited long time employees. And the company could dance around that clause all day. The payout for for short timers was pitiful.

sinklair
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:59 am

Re: Union Time

Post by sinklair » Tue Apr 04, 2023 7:59 pm

Ask the people who are now unemployed from Sinclair’s 25-66-46

Soundchaser
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:01 pm

Re: Union Time

Post by Soundchaser » Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:11 pm

sinklair wrote:
Tue Apr 04, 2023 7:59 pm
Ask the people who are now unemployed from Sinclair’s 25-66-46
Stink.
Explain how the union would have helped these people.

sinklair
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:59 am

Re: Union Time

Post by sinklair » Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:48 pm

Reread my previous posts. Find someone to help you sound out the big words.

Soundchaser
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:01 pm

Re: Union Time

Post by Soundchaser » Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:13 pm

sinklair wrote:
Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:48 pm
Reread my previous posts. Find someone to help you sound out the big words.
What, are you pouting now?
It's a legitimate question.
What would a union have done for those layed off?

User avatar
Herm
Posts: 279
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:31 am

Re: Union Time

Post by Herm » Tue Apr 04, 2023 10:06 pm

In 2008 when there was a big round of lay-offs at WEYI the official statement from the union rep was, “I can’t tell the company how to run itself into the ground.”
There isn’t really much that a union can do to stop a company from eliminating positions.

sinklair
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:59 am

Re: Union Time

Post by sinklair » Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:13 pm

Be careful, Herm. You’re talking about an off-air employee!

The fact that we had less than effective representation at one station doesn’t mean that there aren’t examples where unions worked effectively with employers to improve pay and work conditions.

Unions aren’t perfect… but they have to be better than what we are getting with Sinclair and its singular decision to lay off most the staff and cut entire newscasts so it can increase profit margins.

User avatar
HD74
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:53 pm
Location: SOMEWHERE BEHIND THE RACKS

Re: Union Time

Post by HD74 » Wed Apr 05, 2023 12:34 am

Better call Betty.
You're never too old to learn something stupid.

User avatar
Herm
Posts: 279
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:31 am

Re: Union Time

Post by Herm » Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:23 am

sinklair wrote:
Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:13 pm
Be careful, Herm. You’re talking about an off-air employee!

The fact that we had less than effective representation at one station doesn’t mean that there aren’t examples where unions worked effectively with employers to improve pay and work conditions.

Unions aren’t perfect… but they have to be better than what we are getting with Sinclair and its singular decision to lay off most the staff and cut entire newscasts so it can increase profit margins.
C’mon dude… stay on topic.
Unions absolutely have been effective in improving working conditions. I’m not denying that at all. I’m just saying that a Union probably wouldn’t have been able to stop any layoffs or show cancelations in this situation.

Soundchaser
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:01 pm

Re: Union Time

Post by Soundchaser » Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:05 pm

When you pay about 1.5 % in dues, it really doesn't make much sense to have someone negotiate you a 2% raise. Plus all contracts are written to favor the employer. That's a fact. 12s contract isn't worth the paper it is written on.
Unions are useless in this day and age.

sinklair
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:59 am

Re: Union Time

Post by sinklair » Wed Apr 05, 2023 9:53 pm

That’s the wrong equation. You should compare 1.5% of a job or 0% with no job.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic