https://www.emilystivers.com/meet-emily
I get that to gain an edge in the Democratic primary field, it helps to be as diverse as you can. Being a part of any type of marginalized group gains you street cred. But the candidate above seems to have found a nice little loophole to make up for her lack of marginalization. She is a cisgendered white female who has been in a heterosexual marriage for 9 years. Not very good credentials if you expect to get anywhere in the Democratic party, or get money for that matter. So, she says that she is bisexual. Genius! Now she gets included on the lists of LGBTQ candidates to support, gets campaign money for being a member of the LGBTQ family, and instantly gets a leg up on the plain ol' straight heterosexuals she is running against. I'm duly impressed!
Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Is this cheating?
Re: Is this cheating?
Is she in a throuple with her husband and Elissa Slotkin?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 6:30 pmhttps://www.emilystivers.com/meet-emily
I get that to gain an edge in the Democratic primary field, it helps to be as diverse as you can. Being a part of any type of marginalized group gains you street cred. But the candidate above seems to have found a nice little loophole to make up for her lack of marginalization. She is a cisgendered white female who has been in a heterosexual marriage for 9 years. Not very good credentials if you expect to get anywhere in the Democratic party, or get money for that matter. So, she says that she is bisexual. Genius! Now she gets included on the lists of LGBTQ candidates to support, gets campaign money for being a member of the LGBTQ family, and instantly gets a leg up on the plain ol' straight heterosexuals she is running against. I'm duly impressed!
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
-
Graham Wellington
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Is this cheating?
A throuple would only benefit them in their races!Matt wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 7:06 pmIs she in a throuple with her husband and Elissa Slotkin?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 6:30 pmhttps://www.emilystivers.com/meet-emily
I get that to gain an edge in the Democratic primary field, it helps to be as diverse as you can. Being a part of any type of marginalized group gains you street cred. But the candidate above seems to have found a nice little loophole to make up for her lack of marginalization. She is a cisgendered white female who has been in a heterosexual marriage for 9 years. Not very good credentials if you expect to get anywhere in the Democratic party, or get money for that matter. So, she says that she is bisexual. Genius! Now she gets included on the lists of LGBTQ candidates to support, gets campaign money for being a member of the LGBTQ family, and instantly gets a leg up on the plain ol' straight heterosexuals she is running against. I'm duly impressed!
I understand that Democrats aren't big on vetting people. Whether it's a voter's registration status, people crossing the borders illegally, people claiming to be a certain sex, or a presidential candidate's cognitive state - the party doesn't like to pry insignificant things like that. But this seems like a case of stolen valor.
Re: Is this cheating?
You mean politicians lie and say and do whatever they have to in order to gain support and votes???? This is shocking news.
I can't wait to see your reaction when you find out the sun rises in the East EVERY MORNING.
I can't wait to see your reaction when you find out the sun rises in the East EVERY MORNING.
Re: Is this cheating?
These day's you never know. The East may self identify as the West. If you challenge the assertation that East really is the East and cannot truly be the West, you will be called all sorts of names.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is this cheating?
Bisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Is this cheating?
I can say I'm a great hockey player. I can feel like a hockey player. If I don't ever strap em on and get out on the ice, am I really a hockey player?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pmBisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is this cheating?
Were you still hetero when you were a virgin?Bryce wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 11:02 pmI can say I'm a great hockey player. I can feel like a hockey player. If I don't ever strap em on and get out on the ice, am I really a hockey player?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pmBisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Is this cheating?
There's a prominent picture of gumsy, a child, and Slotkin on a website claiming gumsy is bisexual. How would you feel if a Republican candidate proclaimed that he is heterosexual all over his campaign website?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pmBisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
-
Graham Wellington
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Is this cheating?
The irony is that LGBT people used to hide the fact that they were LGBT. Now, in the Democrat party, it appears you have to hide that you are in a seemingly committed heterosexual marriage. Gumsy 
makes sure to prominently display she is bi. It's listed before "mom", so it must be more important to her than her role as a mother. Whatever her status, her husband must be a major cuck.
makes sure to prominently display she is bi. It's listed before "mom", so it must be more important to her than her role as a mother. Whatever her status, her husband must be a major cuck.Re: Is this cheating?
I see what you did there!Bryce wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 11:02 pmI can say I'm a great hockey player. I can feel like a hockey player. If I don't ever strap em on and get out on the ice, am I really a hockey player?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pmBisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
-
MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is this cheating?
It wouldn’t bother me.Matt wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 5:12 amThere's a prominent picture of gumsy, a child, and Slotkin on a website claiming gumsy is bisexual. How would you feel if a Republican candidate proclaimed that he is heterosexual all over his campaign website?MotorCityRadioFreak wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 9:58 pmBisexuals don't have to be dating both sexes or having a throuple to legitimize their bisexuality. Absolute ignorance here.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Is this cheating?
I imagine I was. I just didn't feel the need to go around telling everyone, putting the fact on a website and using it as a signature line.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: Is this cheating?
Because you didn’t have to do so. That is the world’s default.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: Is this cheating?
Welcome back Lucky, or Leo. Or is it Lucy?Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 6:30 pmhttps://www.emilystivers.com/meet-emily
I get that to gain an edge in the Democratic primary field, it helps to be as diverse as you can. Being a part of any type of marginalized group gains you street cred. But the candidate above seems to have found a nice little loophole to make up for her lack of marginalization. She is a cisgendered white female who has been in a heterosexual marriage for 9 years. Not very good credentials if you expect to get anywhere in the Democratic party, or get money for that matter. So, she says that she is bisexual. Genius! Now she gets included on the lists of LGBTQ candidates to support, gets campaign money for being a member of the LGBTQ family, and instantly gets a leg up on the plain ol' straight heterosexuals she is running against. I'm duly impressed!
I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.