Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 16 at 11:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues in the State of Michigan. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6408
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Wed Nov 10, 2021 7:37 pm

A monumental press release took place at Affirmations in Ferndale for the LGBTQ community. Jocelyn Benson has approved the gender X marking for the transgender and non binary communities who are 9x more at risk of suicide and violence. Great step!

https://youtu.be/WYCY12rkBZA


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

Matt
Posts: 9849
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by Matt » Wed Nov 10, 2021 7:54 pm

Meanwhile, people can't access core SOS services in a timely manner.


What's more pathetic: harassing an old man who is paying to do a radio show or supporting a grifter like Trump?

TC Shuts Up
Posts: 2314
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:10 pm

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by TC Shuts Up » Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:43 am

Appeasing a small percentage of the population will not cut it when gasoline, natural gas, heating oil, and propane take up a huqe amount of the common people's budget. People already have a hard time paying for it. Jostlin' Benson should put that into her woke pipe for smoking pot.


Disagreeing with Communists is NOT an impeachable offense.

Never eat Sushi past its expiration date.

Those who refuse to drain the swamp are doomed to drown in it.

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8546
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by audiophile » Thu Nov 11, 2021 7:03 am

I would support XX and XY.


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10104
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by TC Talks » Thu Nov 11, 2021 8:12 am

TC Shuts Up wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:43 am
Appeasing a small percentage of the population will not cut it when gasoline, natural gas, heating oil, and propane take up a huqe amount of the common people's budget. People already have a hard time paying for it. Jostlin' Benson should put that into her woke pipe for smoking pot.
Spoken like someone who's never shared a spliff with the secretary of state.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
MWmetalhead
Site Admin
Posts: 11872
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by MWmetalhead » Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:15 pm

I am going to ask a potentially naïve question:

Why is gender identification necessary on a driver's license in the first place?



User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by Bryce » Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:19 pm

MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:15 pm
I am going to ask a potentially naïve question:

Why is gender identification necessary on a driver's license in the first place?
For really ugly people named Pat?


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10104
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by TC Talks » Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:23 pm

MWmetalhead wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:15 pm
I am going to ask a potentially naïve question:

Why is gender identification necessary on a driver's license in the first place?
Many reasons but mostly it's a legal form of identification which can impact many decisions.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by km1125 » Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:50 pm

If you can just change it to "X", then it obviously doesn't matter anymore. I say remove the field.



MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6408
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:53 pm

km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:50 pm
If you can just change it to "X", then it obviously doesn't matter anymore. I say remove the field.
It matters for police description over their radios I suppose.

The registration fees did go up under her watch, but it is funding the roads so I don’t have a problem with it.


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by km1125 » Thu Nov 11, 2021 8:40 pm

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:53 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:50 pm
If you can just change it to "X", then it obviously doesn't matter anymore. I say remove the field.
It matters for police description over their radios I suppose.

The registration fees did go up under her watch, but it is funding the roads so I don’t have a problem with it.
How do they describe an "X"?



MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6408
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Fri Nov 19, 2021 7:33 pm

km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 8:40 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:53 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:50 pm
If you can just change it to "X", then it obviously doesn't matter anymore. I say remove the field.
It matters for police description over their radios I suppose.

The registration fees did go up under her watch, but it is funding the roads so I don’t have a problem with it.
How do they describe an "X"?
Gender queer/non-binary


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by km1125 » Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:30 pm

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Nov 19, 2021 7:33 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 8:40 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:53 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:50 pm
If you can just change it to "X", then it obviously doesn't matter anymore. I say remove the field.
It matters for police description over their radios I suppose.

The registration fees did go up under her watch, but it is funding the roads so I don’t have a problem with it.
How do they describe an "X"?
Gender queer/non-binary
I thought "queer" was derogatory!

I'm beginning to think the whole gender thing is like Schrödinger's Cat, or something like Quantum Superposition. It can be anywhere or anything at any time and if you try to measure it, it could change when under observation.



MotorCityRadioFreak
Posts: 6408
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
Location: Warren, MI

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by MotorCityRadioFreak » Fri Nov 19, 2021 9:07 pm

km1125 wrote:
Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:30 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Nov 19, 2021 7:33 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 8:40 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:53 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:50 pm
If you can just change it to "X", then it obviously doesn't matter anymore. I say remove the field.
It matters for police description over their radios I suppose.

The registration fees did go up under her watch, but it is funding the roads so I don’t have a problem with it.
How do they describe an "X"?
Gender queer/non-binary
I thought "queer" was derogatory!

I'm beginning to think the whole gender thing is like Schrödinger's Cat, or something like Quantum Superposition. It can be anywhere or anything at any time and if you try to measure it, it could change when under observation.
Gender is a spectrum just like sexuality is. If you know, you know.


They/them, non-binary and proud.

Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.

km1125
Posts: 3570
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: SOS Jocelyn Benson Approves New Gender Markings on Licenses

Post by km1125 » Fri Nov 19, 2021 9:38 pm

MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Nov 19, 2021 9:07 pm
km1125 wrote:
Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:30 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Fri Nov 19, 2021 7:33 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 8:40 pm
MotorCityRadioFreak wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:53 pm
km1125 wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:50 pm
If you can just change it to "X", then it obviously doesn't matter anymore. I say remove the field.
It matters for police description over their radios I suppose.

The registration fees did go up under her watch, but it is funding the roads so I don’t have a problem with it.
How do they describe an "X"?
Gender queer/non-binary
I thought "queer" was derogatory!

I'm beginning to think the whole gender thing is like Schrödinger's Cat, or something like Quantum Superposition. It can be anywhere or anything at any time and if you try to measure it, it could change when under observation.
Gender is a spectrum just like sexuality is. If you know, you know.
That's not what SCIENCE says, but who goes by SCIENCE these days!

Is "queer" derogatory or not these days?



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic