Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues in the State of Michigan. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Deleted User 4520

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Deleted User 4520 » Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:02 pm

Most places like that closed up their fitting rooms too.



User avatar
Turkeytop
Posts: 8877
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:27 pm

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Turkeytop » Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:35 pm

I don't think any of us will suddenly find ourselves with no clothes to wear.


I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7143
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Bryce » Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:17 am

Maybe the spread of the virus would be lessened if the Governor required us all to be naked when we left our homes?

Well, except for face masks.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14095
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Rate This » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:10 am

Bryce wrote:
Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:17 am
Maybe the spread of the virus would be lessened if the Governor required us all to be naked when we left our homes?

Well, except for face masks.
Maybe only the good looking ones should be required to be naked? Have to preserve the Species you know...



User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7143
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Bryce » Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:26 am

Rate This wrote:
Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:10 am
Bryce wrote:
Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:17 am
Maybe the spread of the virus would be lessened if the Governor required us all to be naked when we left our homes?

Well, except for face masks.
Maybe only the good looking ones should be required to be naked? Have to preserve the Species you know...
Pretty tough to do that from six feet away.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8571
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by audiophile » Sat Apr 04, 2020 5:20 am

Whitmer is clearly on a power trip.

EO for cold weather.

EO for E-Cigarettes.

EO to close schools.

EO to close non-essential businesses.

EO line-items for non-essentials inside a essential business.

Oh but remember and Pot and Abortions are still available!


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

km1125
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by km1125 » Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:32 am

audiophile wrote:
Sat Apr 04, 2020 5:20 am
Whitmer is clearly on a power trip.

EO for cold weather.

EO for E-Cigarettes.

EO to close schools.

EO to close non-essential businesses.

EO line-items for non-essentials inside a essential business.

Oh but remember and Pot and Abortions are still available!
Why can't she just execute an EO to get rid of the virus??? Wouldn't that really be the most effective way to protect people and the economy???



User avatar
Rate This
Posts: 14095
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Rate This » Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:36 am

km1125 wrote:
Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:32 am
audiophile wrote:
Sat Apr 04, 2020 5:20 am
Whitmer is clearly on a power trip.

EO for cold weather.

EO for E-Cigarettes.

EO to close schools.

EO to close non-essential businesses.

EO line-items for non-essentials inside a essential business.

Oh but remember and Pot and Abortions are still available!
Why can't she just execute an EO to get rid of the virus??? Wouldn't that really be the most effective way to protect people and the economy???
I’m pretty certain that if she could she would. Between business as usual and this mess I’m pretty sure she’d take business as usual in a heartbeat.



User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10297
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by TC Talks » Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:44 am

Oh look! Another opportunity for Audiophile to complain.

Stores are now limiting people to one in one out. I anticipate all stores will start eliminating non-essential goods for a while to keep the browsers down. Home Depot has been doing an amazing job, I witnessed someone escorting a downstate person out of the store because they should have been in self quarantine and not out and about.

Today when I was picking up a replacement sewage pump they only let a handful of people in at one time.

I've got a shity day ahead of me boys....

Image


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

Matt
Posts: 9970
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Matt » Sat Apr 04, 2020 11:59 am

Bryce wrote:
Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:17 am
Maybe the spread of the virus would be lessened if the Governor required us all to be naked when we left our homes?

Well, except for face masks.
I'm wondering if the governor FULLY committed when she switched from an Olympic hero to a woman.


Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.

User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8571
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by audiophile » Sat Apr 04, 2020 3:53 pm

TC Talks wrote:
Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:44 am
Oh look! Another opportunity for Audiophile to complain.

Stores are now limiting people to one in one out. I anticipate all stores will start eliminating non-essential goods for a while to keep the browsers down. Home Depot has been doing an amazing job, I witnessed someone escorting a downstate person out of the store because they should have been in self quarantine and not out and about.

Today when I was picking up a replacement sewage pump they only let a handful of people in at one time.

I've got a shity day ahead of me boys....

Image

Did you wear a mask? I know you have one along with the rust in your garage.


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10297
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by TC Talks » Sat Apr 04, 2020 5:16 pm

I have a few home made masks that I use. We have a bitty patrol making masks in Traverse City... The ones at the barn are either too light and just keep. the rust out of my mouth or the nuclear kind that catch mold spores. I have ample gloves too., but some are a bit old and are breaking down.


“The more you can increase fear of drugs, crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.”
― Noam Chomsky

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

User avatar
Turkeytop
Posts: 8877
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:27 pm

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Turkeytop » Sun Apr 05, 2020 1:27 pm

lovinlife101 wrote:
Sun Apr 05, 2020 1:22 pm


Face masks are gay.

Home made face masks are striped knee socks, tennis shorts, gold chain over turtle neck, fanny pack gay.
Yes. I wear only brand name masks, with the logo displayed on my face. Columbia, Tommy Hilfinger, Old Navy, Levi.


I started out with nothing and I still have most of it.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7143
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Bryce » Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:03 pm

Turkeytop wrote:
Sun Apr 05, 2020 1:27 pm
lovinlife101 wrote:
Sun Apr 05, 2020 1:22 pm


Face masks are gay.

Home made face masks are striped knee socks, tennis shorts, gold chain over turtle neck, fanny pack gay.
Yes. I wear only brand name masks, with the logo displayed on my face. Columbia, Tommy Hilfinger, Old Navy, Levi.
I figured you for a Carhartt mask.


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7143
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: Clothes are now considered “non-essential”

Post by Bryce » Thu Apr 09, 2020 9:26 pm

I don't remember which country it was, but a group of nudists were ticketed yesterday for not wearing face masks.

:)


New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic