Well, real accountability should start with how they got in that mess anyways and why they ever needed to get off the DWSD pipeline. Who voted in the folks that were in charge when all that was going on?Bail Bonds wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2024 2:04 pmI'm deeply frustrated with Michigan AG Dana Nessel's handling of the Flint water case. Despite promises of justice and accountability, it feels like we're seeing little to no real action or consequences for those responsible. How much longer must the residents of Flint wait for justice? The lack of urgency and tangible results is disheartening and, frankly, unacceptable. We need a clear commitment to resolving this, not just more political posturing.
Given the lack of progress and accountability, it's becoming increasingly clear that perhaps AG Dana Nessel should not only be removed from office but also face legal consequences for her failures in the Flint water crisis.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
More stupidity from Dana Nessel
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
- audiophile
- Posts: 8644
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
You cannot sue your way into prosperity, the monies received will be passed along to prices at the pump as a "environmental surcharge".Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
I contend this lawsuit is morally wrong. They sell a legal product that meets all necessary specifications that most of the citizens of the state need on a daily basis.
What's next - suing Kroger because they sell foods that make you fat and cost Medicaid more?
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
That tactic worked with big tobacco.audiophile wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2024 8:28 pmWhat's next - suing Kroger because they sell foods that make you fat and cost Medicaid more?
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
-
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
We're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
Do you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
She also is joining many other AG's. Strength in numbers.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pmDo you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
-
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
Dana Nessel? Yes, all day. She has proven that time and time again.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pmDo you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12294
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
audiophile wrote: ↑Sun May 12, 2024 8:28 pmYou cannot sue your way into prosperity, the monies received will be passed along to prices at the pump as a "environmental surcharge".Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
I contend this lawsuit is morally wrong. They sell a legal product that meets all necessary specifications that most of the citizens of the state need on a daily basis.
What's next - suing Kroger because they sell foods that make you fat and cost Medicaid more?
Beautifully stated.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.
-
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
That is her only hope - that a competent AG is involved that she can ride the coattails of. Something tells me the other AGs are nothing more than political activists as well.TC Talks wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pmShe also is joining many other AG's. Strength in numbers.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pmDo you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
Or this is a good move for the betterment of society and you disagree.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:41 pmThat is her only hope - that a competent AG is involved that she can ride the coattails of. Something tells me the other AGs are nothing more than political activists as well.TC Talks wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pmShe also is joining many other AG's. Strength in numbers.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pmDo you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Do you support the cigarette lawsuit or the Oxy lawsuit?
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
FIFYTC Talks wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pmShe also is joining many other radical leftist AG's. Strength in numbers.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pmDo you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
Radical leftist as a term is overplayed. It’s like saying they are members of team Easter bunny.km1125 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:17 pmFIFYTC Talks wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pmShe also is joining many other radical leftist AG's. Strength in numbers.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pmDo you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
It must be some hot talk guy's go to phrase. You hear it parroted frequently.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:27 pmRadical leftist as a term is overplayed. It’s like saying they are members of team Easter bunny.km1125 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:17 pmFIFYTC Talks wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pmShe also is joining many other radical leftist AG's. Strength in numbers.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pmDo you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
Maybe.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:27 pmRadical leftist as a term is overplayed. It’s like saying they are members of team Easter bunny.km1125 wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 6:17 pmFIFYTC Talks wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 4:37 pmShe also is joining many other radical leftist AG's. Strength in numbers.Rate This wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:39 pmDo you really think they would go on a wild goose chase to make a statement? There’s no upside to losing it.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Mon May 13, 2024 3:18 pmWe're talking Dana Nessel here. Look at her track record. You really think she stands a remote chance of succeeding here? Just the premise of the lawsuit along screams long, drawn out, and expensive with no clear means of success.Rate This wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:49 pmCalling it a waste of money isn’t very accurate… if it succeeds the state would receive a big windfall on behalf of the citizens of Michigan. It could turn out to be quite lucrative indeed.MWmetalhead wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:51 pmThe suits state attorneys general filed against 3M, et al. for PFAS made sense. Harm in precise physical locations could be directly attributed to the substance.
I am unsure how one can prove what portion of climate change can be directly attributed to burning of fossil fuels. I am also unsure how economic damages associated with fossil fuel usage can be determined. Lastly, our economic vitality and standard of living is highly dependent on fossil fuel availability and usage.
But it's still an accurate term.
Re: More stupidity from Dana Nessel
You mean like the type that get pissed off and shoot their dog, then a goat?
The type who leaves death threats to the people Trump tells them to?
The type who believes in Bomb everyone and let God decide.
The type who leaves death threats to the people Trump tells them to?
The type who believes in Bomb everyone and let God decide.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.