Parallels between the abortion debate and slavery

[Reagan4prez]

Other than being murder, there’s nothing wrong with abortion.

[Reagan4prez]

I'm not sure what they were smoking in 1973, stringing those amendments together like popcorn on string.

Everyone now knows that after conception it is all human, all living, and worthy of protection, like every other human regardless of age or location.

The other side of this debate justifies murder out of convenience. It’s as simple as that.

It’s not about a mother’s body. If it were, abortion would kill the mother. It kills her baby. It’s about the body inside the mother’ body, not the mother’s body.

[Reagan4prez]

What what's wrong RT?

I know it's hard to compete with us Pro-Life folks, as deep down inside your conscience you know we're right...

Even TT is Pro-Life, C'mon join us!

Correct, audiophile.

There is no competition, only logical fallacies from people on the other side that want to keep baby-murder “safe and legal.”

[Reagan4prez]

Most people who were once “pro-choice” and are now pro-life changed for one simple reason. They witnessed an abortion. The brutality is too much for sane, caring people.

Babies are fried with acid, their skulls crushed with their brains oozing out. They are dismembered and removed body part by body part. They are cut on the back of their necks and their brains sucked out the hole.

Yes, one day we will look back on abortion and shake our collective heads in disgust of the 10s of millions of lives (mostly minorities) that were slaughtered “safely and legally” out of convenience.

[Reagan4prez]

Oh, and when you see an ultrasound, that image is not “a woman’s body.” It’s the body of a baby abortionists are about to murder.

[Reagan4prez]

Oh, and when you see an ultrasound, that image is not “a woman’s body.” It’s the body of a baby abortionists are about to murder.

It’s the inside of a woman’s body. One which contains many things that appear on an ultrasound depending on where you place it. Give it up LL.

So a man’s penis inside a woman’s vagina is justification for her to murder him? It’s “inside her body.”

Your twisted, morbid thinking would justify murder of a kidney donor because it’s “inside a woman’s body.”

Oh, and surgeons have their hands “inside the woman’s body.” Should doctors be hunted down and killed like the unborn? Maybe fry them with acid? Decapitate them? Cut the back of their necks and suck their brains out? That’s, abortion, pal.

Oh, what about Siamese twins? It’s “their body.” You’d justify one killing the other.

You’re sick and morally bankrupt.

“Expedentially!”

[Reagan4prez]

So a man’s penis inside a woman’s vagina

Something you have never experienced.

You’ve only experienced it on a screen, just without the vagina.

[Reagan4prez]

So a man’s penis inside a woman’s vagina

Something you have never experienced.

You’ve only experienced it on a screen, just without the vagina.

Running out of insults are we? 4 go arounds will do that.

It’s not an insult. It’s the truth.

[Reagan4prez]

So a man’s penis inside a woman’s vagina

Something you have never experienced.

You’ve only experienced it on a screen, just without the vagina.

Running out of insults are we? 4 go arounds will do that.

It’s not an insult. It’s the truth.

It doesn’t even make any sense dude…

Your inability to grasp even the most basic concepts doesn’t surprise me.

[Reagan4prez]

Just a reminder that murder is wrong.

When a child is conceived in rape, they and the mother are victims. Neither should be killed to appease the other.

Pregnancy is temporary. Death is forever.

Now, make it a great day!