Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Jennifer Granholm On TV

Discussion pertaining to Detroit, Ann Arbor, Port Huron, and SW Ontario
BillT
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:07 pm

Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by BillT » Wed Nov 10, 2021 8:45 am

Saw her on tv recently and she looks different. Looks like she had cosmetic surgery. Anyone else agree?



User avatar
moldyoldie
Posts: 1669
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 1:04 am
Location: On that thar' interweb jobber

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by moldyoldie » Wed Nov 10, 2021 10:37 am

BillT wrote:
Wed Nov 10, 2021 8:45 am
Saw her on tv recently and she looks different. Looks like she had cosmetic surgery. Anyone else agree?
Older, lost a little weight. I see no evidence of obvious cosmetic surgery. If so, it was done well.


"The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one's mind a pleasant place in which to spend one's leisure."
- Sydney J. Harris

km1125
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by km1125 » Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:41 pm

I agree. Seems like the face is pulled back, especially the outer corners of the eyes. Definitely looks a bit "freaky" now.



Deleted User 15688

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by Deleted User 15688 » Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:37 pm

km1125 wrote:
Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:41 pm
I agree. Seems like the face is pulled back, especially the outer corners of the eyes. Definitely looks a bit "freaky" now.
She was always looking freaky. You just can't fix ugly.



screen glare
Posts: 2778
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by screen glare » Wed Nov 10, 2021 4:44 pm

Eyebrows were arched all the way up from above her eyes to forehead and touching her hair line. Clownish. Like Pelosi.

My 2 cents.

But really who cares? Happened to notice because it looked oddball bizarre .



blizzard
Posts: 281
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:51 am

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by blizzard » Wed Nov 10, 2021 7:47 pm

I did not recognize Jenny from the block . . .
https://youtu.be/QQ8mklgHlp0
:hat
Last edited by blizzard on Sat Nov 13, 2021 7:13 am, edited 1 time in total.



mwms9872
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 7:53 pm

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by mwms9872 » Thu Nov 11, 2021 9:11 pm

She had the big ass’d MOLE removed from her face.



MasterB
Posts: 1424
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Kalamazoo

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by MasterB » Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:54 pm

Jennifer Granholm doesn't know jack about energy and she should be fired, I regret voting for her in 2002 I didn't vote for her in 2006. Jennifer is an ugly old hag.


Go Pistons, Let's Go Redwings.

armchair pd
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 5:46 pm
Location: B.F.E.

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by armchair pd » Fri Nov 12, 2021 9:57 am

Rick Grenon wrote:
Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:37 pm
km1125 wrote:
Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:41 pm
I agree. Seems like the face is pulled back, especially the outer corners of the eyes. Definitely looks a bit "freaky" now.
She was always looking freaky. You just can't fix ugly.
Or stupid.



User avatar
ZenithCKLW
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:21 am
Location: Livonia, MI

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by ZenithCKLW » Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:53 am

This board is like watching Mean Girls.



RedfordRob
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:21 pm

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by RedfordRob » Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:05 pm

MasterB wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:54 pm
Jennifer Granholm doesn't know jack about energy and she should be fired, I regret voting for her in 2002 I didn't vote for her in 2006. Jennifer is an ugly old hag.
She knows a lot about energy and should not and will not be fired by the President. I don't regret voting for her in 2002 and I voted for her in 2006. She is an attractive woman.



km1125
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by km1125 » Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:40 pm

RedfordRob wrote:
Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:05 pm
MasterB wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:54 pm
Jennifer Granholm doesn't know jack about energy and she should be fired, I regret voting for her in 2002 I didn't vote for her in 2006. Jennifer is an ugly old hag.
She knows a lot about energy and should not and will not be fired by the President. I don't regret voting for her in 2002 and I voted for her in 2006. She is an attractive woman.
Delusional all the way around. Exactly what does she know about energy? Is she pushing for more nuclear? (because that's the only way we'll have enough for this 'conversion to electric' movement!)

I agree she won't be fired by this President. He probably already forgot that he appointed her.



DAC
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 5:43 pm

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by DAC » Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:13 pm

I think she looked terrible when she was governor and looks equally terrible now. But, yes, different. Just like everyone else as they age (except maybe Dick Clark).



Editorcj
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:49 pm

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by Editorcj » Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:04 pm

Governor Granholm was incredibly good to work with and never ducked the cameras or refused to answer questions, a far cry from the recluse that Snyder became and the Democratic Sarah Palin we have in the governor's mansion now.



RedfordRob
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:21 pm

Re: Jennifer Granholm On TV

Post by RedfordRob » Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:15 pm

km1125 wrote:
Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:40 pm
RedfordRob wrote:
Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:05 pm
MasterB wrote:
Thu Nov 11, 2021 11:54 pm
Jennifer Granholm doesn't know jack about energy and she should be fired, I regret voting for her in 2002 I didn't vote for her in 2006. Jennifer is an ugly old hag.
She knows a lot about energy and should not and will not be fired by the President. I don't regret voting for her in 2002 and I voted for her in 2006. She is an attractive woman.
Delusional all the way around. Exactly what does she know about energy? Is she pushing for more nuclear? (because that's the only way we'll have enough for this 'conversion to electric' movement!)

I agree she won't be fired by this President. He probably already forgot that he appointed her.
The "Delusion" is that you believe you know more about energy than the Secretary of Energy.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic