After yesterday's speech, if you vote for Trump, you have blood on your hands

[bmw]

So, it's ok when your side actually say's it, but not ok if you can twist the meaning around of what mine said,

Got it.

Of course that's how it works. Remember when the lefties in here twisted themselves into pretzels defending this?



When Lori said it, a "call to arms" was just a figure of speech. When Trump uses figures of speech, he's a human slaughtering Hitler.

[Bryce]

So, it's ok when your side actually say's it, but not ok if you can twist the meaning around of what mine said,

Got it.

Of course that's how it works. Remember when the lefties in here twisted themselves into pretzels defending this?



When Lori said it, a "call to arms" was just a figure of speech. When Trump uses figures of speech, he's a human slaughtering Hitler.

Should we even mention Maxine Waters? And, lest we forget, they have "mostly peaceful protests," while we hold "insurrections."

[Rate This]

So, it's ok when your side actually say's it, but not ok if you can twist the meaning around of what mine said,

Got it.

Of course that's how it works. Remember when the lefties in here twisted themselves into pretzels defending this?



When Lori said it, a "call to arms" was just a figure of speech. When Trump uses figures of speech, he's a human slaughtering Hitler.

In that context a call to arms is clearly figurative. Trumps use of bloodbath had no such qualifying language or ambiguity. He just kind of threw it in there. Seriously man… he’s alienating people in droves… doing TERRIBLY in the suburbs and on and on. This is becoming akin to Whitmer against Dixon… as I recall Dixon lost bigly. If he continues down this path he will get his clock cleaned at the ballot box. He is so arrogant he thinks this thing is already sewn up and he can do and say whatever and nothing will happen.

[TC Talks]

Bryce, you mean like this?

The Jan. 6 select committee has heard testimony indicating that then-President Donald Trump — after rioters who swarmed the Capitol began chanting “hang Mike Pence” — expressed support for hanging his vice president, according to three people familiar with the matter.

The White House chief of staff at the time, Mark Meadows, was in the dining room off the Oval Office with Trump at one point during last year’s Capitol attack, the committee has been told. Meadows then left the dining room and informed other people nearby that Trump had signaled a positive view of the prospect of hanging the vice president, the panel heard.

Hearsay

Denial

[bmw]

In that context a call to arms is clearly figurative. Trumps use of bloodbath had no such qualifying language or ambiguity. He just kind of threw it in there.

Since when does a word that has a very specific dictionary definition require "qualifying language"?

[bmw]

Denial

In your case, confirmation bias.

[Rate This]

The context is that Trump has a history of using his words to incite criminal activity, as seen on January 6, 2021 that resulted in the deaths of several people including 2021 FAFO World Champion, Ashli Babbitt.

Yup such violence inciting words such as "peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard,"

I think your definition of inciting criminal activity is off base. In the interest of your education, I will post an example...

“I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh: You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price,” Schumer said. “You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

“Last night, a deranged man sought to murder Brett Kavanaugh at his family’s home.”

“Is anyone surprised that the dangerous rhetoric of this White House, Sen. Schumer and Democrat special interests could incite deadly violence against Supreme Court justices and their families?” Issa wrote in a tweet.

The man wanted to go to the capital to join in the fun as this was happening. He wasn’t trying to stop the folks breaking in. He also prattled on about people taking your country during his speech before the riot.

[Rate This]

In that context a call to arms is clearly figurative. Trumps use of bloodbath had no such qualifying language or ambiguity. He just kind of threw it in there.

Since when does a word that has a very specific dictionary definition require "qualifying language"?

If he meant the economy he would have said economic bloodbath. Instead he said a bloodbath for the country. That’s a much broader statement no matter what irrelevant thing he was saying around it. He knew exactly what he was doing when he said it. The economy was not the subject once he strayed to bloodbath. It was almost an aside to his talking about cars.

Let’s say he was speaking economically. The only bloodbath is the $200 billion the country lost because of his tariffs and the damage he would do if he did this “100% tariff” thing. The economy is roaring right now which is in stark comparison to how he left it. So what exactly is he telling us he’s going to fix because he hasn’t proposed ANYTHING substantive on this. Just a lot of threats and calling immigrants animals and lying about prisoners and insane asylum inmates being released into the country. It’s all horseshit.

His entire campaign is based on scaring his followers and him getting to do what he wants to his perceived enemies once he’s in. There is nothing substantive to improve ANYTHING being proposed by his campaign. He keeps yakking about us being a third world country… that’s exactly what his plan is… to behave like a third world leader in a broken banana republic. Unfortunately for him we don’t live in one. Maybe he can run in Haiti or something?

[teetoppz28]

In that context a call to arms is clearly figurative. Trumps use of bloodbath had no such qualifying language or ambiguity. He just kind of threw it in there.

Since when does a word that has a very specific dictionary definition require "qualifying language"?

Why are you still defending tRump? In your own words, you stated you’d stop listening to him at the point of invoking Hitler…

Not holding my breath for an answer, as you fail to ever respond to direct questioning.

[TC Talks]

Denial

In your case, confirmation bias.

You support Trump's statements lately?

How does his comments align with your values?

[Rate This]

As one of the few Jewish people on the board I am very offended by Mr. Trumps remarks. Jewish voters have almost always voted Democrat. There are, like me, Republican Jews but by and large they vote Democrat. His comments will cost him any Jewish votes he may have gotten and will not win him any friends in the Government of that country. AntiSemetic idiot.

He’s back at it… first suggesting Jews voting for Democrats need to be talked to and following that up with saying they need their heads examined. He really doesn’t understand how to rally people to a cause…