Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Kim Potter: guilty
- craig11152
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
- Location: Ann Arbor
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
Notice all those "police apologists" aren't out rioting, burning and looting because they may disagree with the verdict.
I no longer directly engage trolls
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
Ah, another Being Pro Police thread to end the year, and perhaps the account.
Can't wait to see 'Mr. White Christmas'' acrid response to this.
He definitely needs to drink egg nog and eat some beef, and pass it to the missus...
Can't wait to see 'Mr. White Christmas'' acrid response to this.
He definitely needs to drink egg nog and eat some beef, and pass it to the missus...
"The problem with communication is the illusion that it has occurred."
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
Yup. The "police apologists" are out in full force on this...
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5 ... conviction
According to ultra right wing conservative Alan Dershowitz.The jury’s conviction of Minnesota police officer Kim Potter for the death of Daunte Wright, coupled with the judge’s denial of bail pending her appeal, is a double injustice with dangerous implications for policing in America.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5 ... conviction
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8571
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
I'm not anti-police, but involuntary manslaughter probably is appropriate in this instance.
I support a suspended sentence, however.
I support a suspended sentence, however.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11999
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
Agree on both fronts.
Paul Woods reminds me a bit of the Swedish Chef from the Muppets when he speaks!
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
I could be on board with involuntary manslaughter, but Keith Ellison the former leftist activist and DNC chair, chose to charge first-degree and second-degree manslaughter. That's a whole different ball game.audiophile wrote: ↑Mon Dec 27, 2021 12:55 pmI'm not anti-police, but involuntary manslaughter probably is appropriate in this instance.
I support a suspended sentence, however.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
- audiophile
- Posts: 8571
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
That should be overturned.
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
- craig11152
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
- Location: Ann Arbor
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
I do think she was overcharged but 12 jurors thought otherwise.
I no longer directly engage trolls
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11999
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
She stands a decent chance of winning on appeal.
Paul Woods reminds me a bit of the Swedish Chef from the Muppets when he speaks!
- craig11152
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:15 am
- Location: Ann Arbor
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
As far as I know they need grounds for an appeal. You can't just appeal a verdict you don't like.
What sort of grounds are they pressing or suggesting?
What sort of grounds are they pressing or suggesting?
I no longer directly engage trolls
Re: Kim Potter: guilty
Read the Dershowitz column I linked to above. He lays out several reasons for appeal.craig11152 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 28, 2021 11:31 amAs far as I know they need grounds for an appeal. You can't just appeal a verdict you don't like.
What sort of grounds are they pressing or suggesting?
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.