Project Veritas Stole Diary of Pres Biden’s Daughter, Attempted to Blackmail

[MotorCityRadioFreak]

In March 2020, Trump fan Aimee Harris stole the diary of Ms. Biden at a home where she was staying with a mutual friend. Ms. Harris then sold the diary to Project Veritas, a right wing “think tank”. In October 2020, just days before the election, they attempted to blackmail Joe Biden that they would release the contents unless Biden interviewed with Project Veritas. Thankfully, Biden called their bluff, and they were too chicken shit to release the contents.

More here: https://youtu.be/II6CbG4s4IA

[audiophile]

You lie! LOL (Rachel Maddow is your source? Not 100% credible.)

1. There is no evidence the diary was stolen by Project Veritas. (According to TV26 in Florida the diary may been left in Miami when Ms. Biden moved to Philadelphia. That same house was rented to Aimee Harris. She was going through a divorce and needed money.) https://fox26newshenry.com/2021/12/16/h ... t-veritas/

2. It not illegal to obtain documents in the public interest by journalists even if it was obtained originally illegally by a third party. The Supreme decided this issue. https://www.rferl.org/a/1096505.html

3. I'm not convinced asking for an interview with a public official like Joe Biden constitutes an illegal action even if you have damming information in hand and planning on releasing it. I wouldn't be surprised if journalists reach out the White house for comment on a frequent basis on obtained documents. Plus, If there is a logical explanation, maybe the issue goes away?

4. Given that Hunter Biden is involved in many questionable dealings, Project Veritas may have legitimate information in the diary that implicates Joe Biden, and that's why Project Veritas turned the diary over the police without releasing it to the public.

5. Releasing it to the police could also be considered "releasing it".

[Rate This]

You lie! LOL (Rachel Maddow is your source? Not 100% credible.)

1. There is no evidence the diary was stolen by Project Veritas. (According to TV26 in Florida the diary may been left in Miami when Ms. Biden moved to Philadelphia. That same house was rented to Aimee Harris. She was going through a divorce and needed money.) https://fox26newshenry.com/2021/12/16/h ... t-veritas/

2. It not illegal to obtain documents in the public interest by journalists even if it was obtained originally illegally by a third party. The Supreme decided this issue. https://www.rferl.org/a/1096505.html

3. I'm not convinced asking for an interview with a public official like Joe Biden constitutes an illegal action even if you have damming information in hand and planning on releasing it. I wouldn't be surprised if journalists reach out the White house for comment on a frequent basis on obtained documents. Plus, If there is a logical explanation, maybe the issue goes away?

4. Given that Hunter Biden is involved in many questionable dealings, Project Veritas may have legitimate information in the diary that implicates Joe Biden, and that's why Project Veritas turned the diary over the police without releasing it to the public.

5. Releasing it to the police could also be considered "releasing it".

If they even said “interview or this “leaks” that’s blackmail. That’s the central question. Project Veritas is notoriously unethical and underhanded. It’s a political hack organization. No serious journalism or investigating occurs there. Period. They deceptively edit people to run them into the ground. It’s evil.

[MotorCityRadioFreak]

You lie! LOL (Rachel Maddow is your source? Not 100% credible.)

1. There is no evidence the diary was stolen by Project Veritas. (According to TV26 in Florida the diary may been left in Miami when Ms. Biden moved to Philadelphia. That same house was rented to Aimee Harris. She was going through a divorce and needed money.) https://fox26newshenry.com/2021/12/16/h ... t-veritas/

2. It not illegal to obtain documents in the public interest by journalists even if it was obtained originally illegally by a third party. The Supreme decided this issue. https://www.rferl.org/a/1096505.html

3. I'm not convinced asking for an interview with a public official like Joe Biden constitutes an illegal action even if you have damming information in hand and planning on releasing it. I wouldn't be surprised if journalists reach out the White house for comment on a frequent basis on obtained documents. Plus, If there is a logical explanation, maybe the issue goes away?

4. Given that Hunter Biden is involved in many questionable dealings, Project Veritas may have legitimate information in the diary that implicates Joe Biden, and that's why Project Veritas turned the diary over the police without releasing it to the public.

5. Releasing it to the police could also be considered "releasing it".

Whatever makes you sleep at night. (first name removed)

[Robert Faygo]

Maybe it's just me, but referring to posters by real life names on boards where being anonymous is an option that most choose is about the worst kind of protocol violation there is.

Maybe knock it off MCRF. Makes you look like a complete turd of a poster at a minimum ... but more like a complete ass.

[Rate This]

Maybe it's just me, but referring to posters by real life names on boards where being anonymous is an option that most choose is about the worst kind of protocol violation there is.

Maybe knock it off MCRF. Makes you look like a complete turd of a poster at a minimum ... but more like a complete ass.

How do we know that’s the guys name?

[Turkeytop]

Used to be a guy here called himself Bob Simonson. Turned out his real name was Revox.

[MotorCityRadioFreak]

Maybe it's just me, but referring to posters by real life names on boards where being anonymous is an option that most choose is about the worst kind of protocol violation there is.

Maybe knock it off MCRF. Makes you look like a complete turd of a poster at a minimum ... but more like a complete ass.

How do we know that’s the guys name?

We were friends before I saw his hate towards the LGBT community.

I took his first name out.

[Matt]

Maybe it's just me, but referring to posters by real life names on boards where being anonymous is an option that most choose is about the worst kind of protocol violation there is.

Maybe knock it off MCRF. Makes you look like a complete turd of a poster at a minimum ... but more like a complete ass.

Using a first name isn't exactly removing anonymity. We recently had an Alex Jones fan post something that doxxed another poster. The doxxer is a friend of Audiophile...

[TC Talks]

I would think any of us knows each other's info by now...

Anyone notice certain posters all disappeared at the same time?

Anyone wish other newer posters would?

[MotorCityRadioFreak]

I would think any of us knows each other's info by now...

Anyone notice certain posters all disappeared at the same time?

Anyone wish other newer posters would?

I am about done with this place.