Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 12 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
Re: The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
Hmmmm, where have I heard that comment before? That's right! In the DB Repository!
MrReason wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 3:23 pm5. You agree not to routinely and purposely post material in forum topics that is wholly unrelated to the intended purpose of the topic.Turkeytop wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 1:15 pmAnd your point is?MrReason wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 1:14 pm1. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any material that may violate common law or statutory law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed necessary at the discretion of the Administrator. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
Please go away. You were banned many times and nobody wants you here.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
It's just that you're just such a brilliant poster on this board and have been for so many years, it's only right that everyone should be given the opportunity to read all of your past works.
https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... &start=950
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
Yep, that's me! I posted it and readily admit it. But I posted it while using my one and only username/account. Not multiple times and under a banned account. Like you.Bidengirl wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:34 pmWell, look what we have here:
Honeyman wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 2:06 pmYou have a valid point GG. However, there are guidelines posted on the very top of this website that include:
1. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any material that may violate common law or statutory law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed necessary at the discretion of the Administrator. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
6. You agree not to register multiple user accounts for the sole purpose of either (i) thwarting the "friend / foe" settings of other users or (ii) promulgating/ " bumping" a particular forum topic.
The censorship king from out of state.
Re: The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
Because EVERYBODY on the site knows you are using multiple accounts and have been banned multiple times, trollinlife. You are actually think the people on this board are so stupid not to realize that's it's you coming back again and again and again, when in actuality, it's beyond obvious. And the fact that you keep denying it, proves what a dishonest pile of shit you really are.Bidengirl wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:32 pmSo, when you post it, it's you. But when someone else posts it (who is not me) then it's me?Honeyman wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:58 pmYep, that's me! I posted it and readily admit it. But I posted it while using my one and only username/account. Not multiple times and under a banned account. Like you.Bidengirl wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:34 pmWell, look what we have here:
Honeyman wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 2:06 pmYou have a valid point GG. However, there are guidelines posted on the very top of this website that include:
1. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any material that may violate common law or statutory law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed necessary at the discretion of the Administrator. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
6. You agree not to register multiple user accounts for the sole purpose of either (i) thwarting the "friend / foe" settings of other users or (ii) promulgating/ " bumping" a particular forum topic.
How does anyone know you're not behind multiple accounts? You're already a hypocrite, citing anyone (expect for you) who posts anything about the rules here is me. Asinine.
Anyway, to stay within the topic and rules, you are as inconsistent as the groups in the title.
Go away.
The censorship king from out of state.
- MotorCityRadioFreak
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
C U Next Tuesday. Do you know what that stands for, troll? Fucking waste of oxygen.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: The inconsistency of the NAACP and LGBTQbert
This schtick gets old when you post using the exact same material over and over again. Time to start counting words. At least then the threads you are involved in will have substance.Bidengirl wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:32 pmSo, when you post it, it's you. But when someone else posts it (who is not me) then it's me?Honeyman wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:58 pmYep, that's me! I posted it and readily admit it. But I posted it while using my one and only username/account. Not multiple times and under a banned account. Like you.Bidengirl wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 2:34 pmWell, look what we have here:
Honeyman wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 2:06 pmYou have a valid point GG. However, there are guidelines posted on the very top of this website that include:
1. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any material that may violate common law or statutory law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed necessary at the discretion of the Administrator. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions.
6. You agree not to register multiple user accounts for the sole purpose of either (i) thwarting the "friend / foe" settings of other users or (ii) promulgating/ " bumping" a particular forum topic.
How does anyone know you're not behind multiple accounts? You're already a hypocrite, citing anyone (expect for you) who posts anything about the rules here is me. Asinine.
Anyway, to stay within the topic and rules, you are as inconsistent as the groups in the title.