Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
“Progressives” deny science, now grammar
-
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:10 pm
Re: “Progressives” deny science, now grammar
I believe that one poster here on the Left should be a nemesis known as "Mr. Treason".
Disagreeing with Communists is NOT an impeachable offense.
Never eat Sushi past its expiration date.
Those who refuse to drain the swamp are doomed to drown in it.
Never eat Sushi past its expiration date.
Those who refuse to drain the swamp are doomed to drown in it.
Re: “Progressives” deny science, now grammar
MrReason wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:53 pmWe’ve seen where the scientific fact of XX and XY are under attack, now the idea of a singular person as “they/them” is supposed to be accurate.
Multiple personalities and hearing voices? Maybe.
But I refuse to refer to any single person as “they/them.” A single person gets a singular term. Multiple people get a plural term.
Now, make it a great day!
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
- Posts: 6451
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: “Progressives” deny science, now grammar
No, that's you and the OP.TC Shuts Up wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:03 pmI believe that one poster here on the Left should be a nemesis known as "Mr. Treason".
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Re: “Progressives” deny science, now grammar
What exactly are we fishing for with all that gear?Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:14 pmMrReason wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:53 pmWe’ve seen where the scientific fact of XX and XY are under attack, now the idea of a singular person as “they/them” is supposed to be accurate.
Multiple personalities and hearing voices? Maybe.
But I refuse to refer to any single person as “they/them.” A single person gets a singular term. Multiple people get a plural term.
Now, make it a great day!
-
- Posts: 2778
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am
Re: “Progressives” deny science, now grammar
Fishing for a way to defend the seditious, insurrection inciter, real and present danger - (Worst) President (Ever) Donny Trump.
Finally - the psychopathic liar came up with a whopper powerful enough to motivate a violent attack on the capitol of The United States of America, and democracy itself.
You may have to fish for a convincing defense through very rough waters all around the world.
The only “ they / them” you should focus on are the white terrorist humans who on January 6th revealed the thorough Trumpian washing of their brains.
Finally - the psychopathic liar came up with a whopper powerful enough to motivate a violent attack on the capitol of The United States of America, and democracy itself.
You may have to fish for a convincing defense through very rough waters all around the world.
The only “ they / them” you should focus on are the white terrorist humans who on January 6th revealed the thorough Trumpian washing of their brains.
-
- Posts: 6451
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 6:26 am
- Location: Warren, MI
Re: “Progressives” deny science, now grammar
Well said...as always.screen glare wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:54 amFishing for a way to defend the seditious, insurrection inciter, real and present danger - (Worst) President (Ever) Donny Trump.
Finally - the psychopathic liar came up with a whopper powerful enough to motivate a violent attack on the capitol of The United States of America, and democracy itself.
You may have to fish for a convincing defense through very rough waters all around the world.
The only “ they / them” you should focus on are the white terrorist humans who on January 6th revealed the thorough Trumpian washing of their brains.
They/them, non-binary and proud.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
Remember that “2000 Mules” was concocted by a circus of elephants.
The right needs to stop worry about what’s between people’s legs. Instead, they should focus on what’s between their ears.
Audacity sucks.
-
- Posts: 2778
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am
Re: “Progressives” deny science, now grammar
That gear and set up is designed for TROLLING with the hope you catch something.Rate This wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:28 amWhat exactly are we fishing for with all that gear?Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:14 pmMrReason wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:53 pmWe’ve seen where the scientific fact of XX and XY are under attack, now the idea of a singular person as “they/them” is supposed to be accurate.
Multiple personalities and hearing voices? Maybe.
But I refuse to refer to any single person as “they/them.” A single person gets a singular term. Multiple people get a plural term.
Now, make it a great day!
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: “Progressives” deny science, now grammar
Ah excellent.Bryce wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:07 amThat gear and set up is designed for TROLLING with the hope you catch something.Rate This wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:28 amWhat exactly are we fishing for with all that gear?Bryce wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 7:14 pmMrReason wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:53 pmWe’ve seen where the scientific fact of XX and XY are under attack, now the idea of a singular person as “they/them” is supposed to be accurate.
Multiple personalities and hearing voices? Maybe.
But I refuse to refer to any single person as “they/them.” A single person gets a singular term. Multiple people get a plural term.
Now, make it a great day!