Undercover Anti Vaxxer Spoils Dozens of Vaccines

[MotorCityRadioFreak]

Psycho bitch intentionally left out several dozen Moderna vaccine vials causing them to spoil. Due to lack of refrigeration, they were discarded.


https://www.ksbw.com/article/hundreds-o ... e/35101448

[Matt]

What a cunt. Her sentence should be she has to get vaccinated.

[Rate This]

What a cunt. Her sentence should be she has to get vaccinated.

No rubbing alcohol and done right after she’s startled awake from a deep sleep.

[Lester The Nightfly]

So here's a question for you kids. If folks are willing condemn the actions of this person, a health professional, circumventing the administration of a legal course of treatment because of their own personal convictions to the point of threats of felony criminal arrest, how does that square with a heath care professional who would circumvent the administration of legal course treatment involving birth control/"Plan B" morning after pill or abortion based on their own personal convictions?

In other words, if you're willing to throw this pharmacist to the wolves for a dereliction of duty by letting their personal feelings standing in the way of a patient's health and well being, then what of a pharmacist who refuses to dispense birth control or morning after pills or a doctor who will refuse a patient an abortion because it's against their personal convictions?

I can't wait to see the double standard spin on this...

[Chrocket87]

Is said pharmacist destroying the morning after pills/birth control so another pharmacist can’t administer it?

[Lester The Nightfly]

Is said pharmacist destroying the morning after pills/birth control so another pharmacist can’t administer it?

Immaterial. The delivery of health care services was interrupted by a providers personal agenda. Do we condone that or not?

[Rate This]

Is said pharmacist destroying the morning after pills/birth control so another pharmacist can’t administer it?

That would be the general idea as was the anti-vaxxers point here. That person in the vaccine case deserves a hefty sentence. Someone in the other example would also deserve such a sentence. They do not have the right to let their personal convictions interfere with somebody else's decision to receive something.

I don't care for rap music. I don't however run around destroying the devices that play said music. I simply avoid it and leave those people be.

[Turkeytop]

If she's anti-vax that's her right. If she doesn't want to dispense or administer the vaccine, I suppose that's her right.

But it's not within her rights to wantonly destroy a valuable, scarce and badly needed medicine.

[Rate This]

If she's anti-vax that's her right. If she doesn't want to dispense or administer the vaccine, I suppose that's her right.

But it's not within her rights to wantonly destroy a valuable, scarce and badly needed medicine.

We have a winner.

[Matt]

So here's a question for you kids. If folks are willing condemn the actions of this person, a health professional, circumventing the administration of a legal course of treatment because of their own personal convictions to the point of threats of felony criminal arrest, how does that square with a heath care professional who would circumvent the administration of legal course treatment involving birth control/"Plan B" morning after pill or abortion based on their own personal convictions?

In other words, if you're willing to throw this pharmacist to the wolves for a dereliction of duty by letting their personal feelings standing in the way of a patient's health and well being, then what of a pharmacist who refuses to dispense birth control or morning after pills or a doctor who will refuse a patient an abortion because it's against their personal convictions?

I can't wait to see the double standard spin on this...

There is only one way to get pregnant. Someone else's pregnancy does not threaten anyone else's life or liberty. Your analogy fails on all accounts. While I disagree with abortion, I do think that someone that breaks the law should be charged with a felony.

[Rate This]

So here's a question for you kids. If folks are willing condemn the actions of this person, a health professional, circumventing the administration of a legal course of treatment because of their own personal convictions to the point of threats of felony criminal arrest, how does that square with a heath care professional who would circumvent the administration of legal course treatment involving birth control/"Plan B" morning after pill or abortion based on their own personal convictions?

In other words, if you're willing to throw this pharmacist to the wolves for a dereliction of duty by letting their personal feelings standing in the way of a patient's health and well being, then what of a pharmacist who refuses to dispense birth control or morning after pills or a doctor who will refuse a patient an abortion because it's against their personal convictions?

I can't wait to see the double standard spin on this...

There is only one way to get pregnant. Someone else's pregnancy does not threaten anyone else's life or liberty. Your analogy fails on all accounts. While I disagree with abortion, I do think that someone that breaks the law should be charged with a felony.

Would you agree that like destroying the vaccine it should also be some kind of offense to destroy other medications or medical supplies based on on ones personal beliefs?

[Matt]

So here's a question for you kids. If folks are willing condemn the actions of this person, a health professional, circumventing the administration of a legal course of treatment because of their own personal convictions to the point of threats of felony criminal arrest, how does that square with a heath care professional who would circumvent the administration of legal course treatment involving birth control/"Plan B" morning after pill or abortion based on their own personal convictions?

In other words, if you're willing to throw this pharmacist to the wolves for a dereliction of duty by letting their personal feelings standing in the way of a patient's health and well being, then what of a pharmacist who refuses to dispense birth control or morning after pills or a doctor who will refuse a patient an abortion because it's against their personal convictions?

I can't wait to see the double standard spin on this...

There is only one way to get pregnant. Someone else's pregnancy does not threaten anyone else's life or liberty. Your analogy fails on all accounts. While I disagree with abortion, I do think that someone that breaks the law should be charged with a felony.

Would you agree that like destroying the vaccine it should also be some kind of offense to destroy other medications or medical supplies based on on ones personal beliefs?

I thought I made that clear when I said it should also be a felony. My differentiation is that someone getting knocked up doesn't directly hurt or possibly kill someone else. This is not apples to apples by any means.

[Lester The Nightfly]

So here's a question for you kids. If folks are willing condemn the actions of this person, a health professional, circumventing the administration of a legal course of treatment because of their own personal convictions to the point of threats of felony criminal arrest, how does that square with a heath care professional who would circumvent the administration of legal course treatment involving birth control/"Plan B" morning after pill or abortion based on their own personal convictions?

In other words, if you're willing to throw this pharmacist to the wolves for a dereliction of duty by letting their personal feelings standing in the way of a patient's health and well being, then what of a pharmacist who refuses to dispense birth control or morning after pills or a doctor who will refuse a patient an abortion because it's against their personal convictions?

I can't wait to see the double standard spin on this...

There is only one way to get pregnant. Someone else's pregnancy does not threaten anyone else's life or liberty. Your analogy fails on all accounts. While I disagree with abortion, I do think that someone that breaks the law should be charged with a felony.

No fail because the question, which was asked more succinctly in the follow-up to Chrocket87

"The delivery of health care services was interrupted by a providers personal agenda. Do we condone that or not?"

has yet to be answered. Lot's of spin or qualifiers, but nobody willing to admit you can't have it both ways without being morally disingenuous. No big deal, it's what I've come to expect out of those who seek to claim some righteous high ground. I just wanted it on the record...

[Matt]

So here's a question for you kids. If folks are willing condemn the actions of this person, a health professional, circumventing the administration of a legal course of treatment because of their own personal convictions to the point of threats of felony criminal arrest, how does that square with a heath care professional who would circumvent the administration of legal course treatment involving birth control/"Plan B" morning after pill or abortion based on their own personal convictions?

In other words, if you're willing to throw this pharmacist to the wolves for a dereliction of duty by letting their personal feelings standing in the way of a patient's health and well being, then what of a pharmacist who refuses to dispense birth control or morning after pills or a doctor who will refuse a patient an abortion because it's against their personal convictions?

I can't wait to see the double standard spin on this...

There is only one way to get pregnant. Someone else's pregnancy does not threaten anyone else's life or liberty. Your analogy fails on all accounts. While I disagree with abortion, I do think that someone that breaks the law should be charged with a felony.

No fail because the question, which was asked more succinctly in the follow-up to Chrocket87

"The delivery of health care services was interrupted by a providers personal agenda. Do we condone that or not?"

has yet to be answered. Lot's of spin or qualifiers, but nobody willing to admit you can't have it both ways without being morally disingenuous. No big deal, it's what I've come to expect out of those who seek to claim some righteous high ground. I just wanted it on the record...

I'll make this as clear as I can: when you break the law and take illegal action in a medical setting, you are a felon. I think it is worse when your actions can injure or kill many people, but it is a crime in both circumstances.

[Lester The Nightfly]

So here's a question for you kids. If folks are willing condemn the actions of this person, a health professional, circumventing the administration of a legal course of treatment because of their own personal convictions to the point of threats of felony criminal arrest, how does that square with a heath care professional who would circumvent the administration of legal course treatment involving birth control/"Plan B" morning after pill or abortion based on their own personal convictions?

In other words, if you're willing to throw this pharmacist to the wolves for a dereliction of duty by letting their personal feelings standing in the way of a patient's health and well being, then what of a pharmacist who refuses to dispense birth control or morning after pills or a doctor who will refuse a patient an abortion because it's against their personal convictions?

I can't wait to see the double standard spin on this...

There is only one way to get pregnant. Someone else's pregnancy does not threaten anyone else's life or liberty. Your analogy fails on all accounts. While I disagree with abortion, I do think that someone that breaks the law should be charged with a felony.

No fail because the question, which was asked more succinctly in the follow-up to Chrocket87

"The delivery of health care services was interrupted by a providers personal agenda. Do we condone that or not?"

has yet to be answered. Lot's of spin or qualifiers, but nobody willing to admit you can't have it both ways without being morally disingenuous. No big deal, it's what I've come to expect out of those who seek to claim some righteous high ground. I just wanted it on the record...

I'll make this as clear as I can: when you break the law and take illegal action in a medical setting, you are a felon. I think it is worse when your actions can injure or kill many people, but it is a crime in both circumstances.

Again, that wasn't the question, but I think we're done here.