Lots of new registrations this past week; thank you! Registrations in the queue from March 27 through April 5 at 12:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Greta Thunberg

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
lovinlife101
Posts: 3610
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by lovinlife101 » Tue Jan 21, 2020 11:00 am

screen glare wrote:
Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:04 am
Think of all the world’s big money industries which have a financial stake in ignoring Global Warming and its fatal consequences. Status Quo and Business As Usual are their desires. And they’ll spend whatever it takes to put out confusing and misleading fake science and other information (see above link) - in an effort to make non-scientist consumers doubt Global Warming warnings.

It’s the tobacco industry delay tactics being used, again.
1. Deny.
2. As awareness and evidence mounts - create confusion about the evidence.
3. Fund pervasive, slick ad campaigns to convince consumers to keep smoking.
4. Plot a course to make just as much money when steps 1-3 eventually fail. Such as - increasing sales to adults and kids overseas.

That delay time period resulted in fatal diseases in greater numbers for those who continued to smoked.

However with Global Warming everyone on earth can expect dire to-the-point-of-death consequences. The well-funded ad/psa/industry spokesperson “casting doubt campaign” is sucking up our finite lead time to mitigate man-made Global Warming consequences. So this is much worse that the Ignore Science Keep Smoking plot.
Here’s the lunatics’ strategy:

1. Make up a fake crisis.
2. Convince the stupid that bigger government and less individual freedom is the only answer.
3. Recruit children and the mentally ill to carry the message so that when intelligent people push back you can scream, “How deh you!”



lovinlife101
Posts: 3610
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by lovinlife101 » Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am

Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.



Rate This
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by Rate This » Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am

lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?



lovinlife101
Posts: 3610
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by lovinlife101 » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am

Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.



Rate This
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by Rate This » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am

lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...



lovinlife101
Posts: 3610
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by lovinlife101 » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am

Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”



Rate This
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by Rate This » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:51 am

lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”
Are you channeling your inner Adam Schiff or something?



lovinlife101
Posts: 3610
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by lovinlife101 » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:53 am

Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:51 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”
Are you channeling your inner Adam Schiff or something?
Something.



User avatar
Honeyman
Posts: 396
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:44 pm

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by Honeyman » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:55 am

lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”

2020-2004 = 16



Rate This
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by Rate This » Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:59 am

Honeyman wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:55 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”

2020-2004 = 16
I would duck right about now...



Rate This
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by Rate This » Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:01 pm

lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:53 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:51 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”
Are you channeling your inner Adam Schiff or something?
Something.
What makes you so lonely? Clearly being a troll completes some missing piece of your life. What has you in such pain?



lovinlife101
Posts: 3610
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by lovinlife101 » Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:02 pm

Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:01 pm
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:53 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:51 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”
Are you channeling your inner Adam Schiff or something?
Something.
What makes you so lonely? Clearly being a troll completes some missing piece of your life. What has you in such pain?
I hope whoever you are talking to answers your question. I’d live to help them.



Rate This
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 12:17 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by Rate This » Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:04 pm

lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:02 pm
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:01 pm
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:53 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:51 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”
Are you channeling your inner Adam Schiff or something?
Something.
What makes you so lonely? Clearly being a troll completes some missing piece of your life. What has you in such pain?
I hope whoever you are talking to answers your question. I’d live to help them.
Do you mean love? Honestly I can’t really see you living to help people and love... we already talked about how you haven’t been laid so...



lovinlife101
Posts: 3610
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:53 am

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by lovinlife101 » Wed Jan 22, 2020 2:48 pm

Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:04 pm
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:02 pm
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:01 pm
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:53 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:51 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:47 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:01 am
Rate This wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:38 am
lovinlife101 wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 9:16 am
Here’s a 2004 article from The Guardian (that all you libtards agree with) that says all the catastrophic things that will happen by 2020.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... heobserver

100% WRONG!!!!

Keep getting your marching orders and science from bartenders and teenagers with special needs, but I’ll keep improving civilization my way.
So a tolerant Libertardian like yourself is dredging up an obscure 15 year old article to score cheap points?

How exactly are you going to keep improving civilization? What have you done to improve civilization so far?
You speak as if something from 2004 is ancient and non-relevant.

It proves that all climate hysterics have been 100% wrong and will continue that trend. They’re selling fear. You likely believed this article in 2004 and are now denouncing it nearly 16 years later. How are you going to denounce a bar tender and special needs teenager 16 years from today? I’m looking forward to it.

You’ll soon find out that the climate hysterics of last week, heck last hour, will prove false as well. There’s safety in predictability.

I improve civilization by proving the common thinking among the masses is 100% wrong.
What are you talking about? Seriously, what are you talking about? I’ve never even seen that article and it’s written like something from a tabloid... it doesn’t look right...
Me: “Here’s yet another article from the past of where climate hysterics got it 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “That’s an old article! Old means irrelevant! It doesn’t count!”

Me: “History (something from the past, e.g. this article) shows that climate alarmists make up garbage, sell it as fear, ignorant people believe it, and then their claims do not come true.”

Rate This: “WHAT? WHAT? I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!! THE ARTICLE IS NOT WRITTEN WELL!!! I CAN’T UNDERSTAND IT!!!”

<Fast forward 12 years into the future, the time when climate alarmists say the world will end unless their demands are met>

Me: “See? Those 12 year claims were 100% wrong.”

Rate This: “THAT WAS 12 FRICKIN’ YEARS AGO! THAT INFORMATION IS OBSOLETE! GRETA WHO? I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!”
Are you channeling your inner Adam Schiff or something?
Something.
What makes you so lonely? Clearly being a troll completes some missing piece of your life. What has you in such pain?
I hope whoever you are talking to answers your question. I’d live to help them.
Do you mean love? Honestly I can’t really see you living to help people and love... we already talked about how you haven’t been laid so...
I said what I said.



User avatar
Lester The Nightfly
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:19 pm

Re: Greta Thunberg

Post by Lester The Nightfly » Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:01 pm

Honeyman wrote:
Wed Jan 22, 2020 11:55 am
2020-2004 = 16
It is worth noting that 16 years much can change in terms of scientific investigation, knowledge and understanding. Ask someone with cancer, for example, about the treatment advances in 16 years and many will say it's the difference between life and death.

I don't think it's much of a stretch to assume, given all the scientific resources applied to understanding global climate change, the best available information now may be different than in 2004.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic