Is absolutely the wrong thing to do. At least according to a whole host of Democrats.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Holding The AG In Contempt Of Congress
Holding The AG In Contempt Of Congress
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: Holding The AG In Contempt Of Congress
Clearly, he is in contempt. But when it comes to a choice between doing what is their legal and moral duty, or doing what is politically expedient, Democrats will usually choose the path of expediency
I don't mean to brag, but I just put a puzzle together in 1 day and the box said 2-4 years.
Re: Holding The AG In Contempt Of Congress
. No, he's not in contempt. The AG is complying with the existing law.
Re: Holding The AG In Contempt Of Congress
Add me to the list. I have nothing but contempt for the current Congress and their continual shit show.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.