Interesting discussion points here...
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... avery.html
Thoughts? I'll post mine after a few others chime in.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through April 26 at 9:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
The 1619 Project
Re: The 1619 Project
I am happy we have a chance to face our blighted past. I am betting our more race ignorant posters will remain silent.
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: The 1619 Project
The N.Y. Slimes wont let me read it unless I subscribe. I think not.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
Re: The 1619 Project
Name calling, so effective in making your point. BTW, I read both the NY Times and the WSJ so I get both sides of the story.
In brief, the 1619 Project from the Times contends that the history of slavery in America is important, relates to many things that are happening today and pretty much swept under the carpet in history books. Some pretty compelling arguments are made.. and to be clear, this is not about reparations or payments, just the history.
I find it very disturbing that in my lifetime, World War II veterans were beaten and lynched with no-one being held accountable.
Feel free to continue name calling, if that makes you happy.
Re: The 1619 Project
Most likely just as happy as saying Radio Sucks.Radio Sucks wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:46 am
Feel free to continue name calling, if that makes you happy.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:53 am
- Location: Fishing somewhere
Re: The 1619 Project
In defense of Bryce, asking folks opinion about a link that requires a subscription, well …Radio Sucks wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:46 amName calling, so effective in making your point. BTW, I read both the NY Times and the WSJ so I get both sides of the story.
Same with WSJ really. Get to read about a paragraph and a half, then need to subscribe to see the rest of the article.
Re: The 1619 Project
This was a weak troll which died. Try again.
Re: The 1619 Project
Impolite behavior should never be defended. I sometimes forget that I do have online subscriptions and don't run into the same paywall that others do. I will try to be more careful.Circle Seven wrote: ↑Sun Aug 25, 2019 8:29 am
In defense of Bryce, asking folks opinion about a link that requires a subscription, well …