Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Saw this chart today in an anti-wall piece by CNN today:
Immediately when I saw those numbers I knew they looked awfully familiar. That is because they are - they very closely mirror public approval of Obamacare before it was passed in 2010.
Yet I don't seem to recall CNN back then posting daily articles opposing Obamacare on the ground that Americans don't want it like they are today with Trump's wall. Can you even begin to imagine how CNN would cover the wall if Trump were to get it built the same way Obamacare got passed? ie, by passing a bill through the House that nobody wanted and then ramming it through the Senate, on Christmas Eve, during a snowstorm, to avoid reconciliation before a specific seat in the Senate constituted a 41st vote to block the legislation (ie, Scott Brown)? It was a spectacle then, and the media was perfectly fine with it. If Trump did anything like that today, the folks at CNN would be fit to be tied.
Just another example of glaring media bias.
Immediately when I saw those numbers I knew they looked awfully familiar. That is because they are - they very closely mirror public approval of Obamacare before it was passed in 2010.
Yet I don't seem to recall CNN back then posting daily articles opposing Obamacare on the ground that Americans don't want it like they are today with Trump's wall. Can you even begin to imagine how CNN would cover the wall if Trump were to get it built the same way Obamacare got passed? ie, by passing a bill through the House that nobody wanted and then ramming it through the Senate, on Christmas Eve, during a snowstorm, to avoid reconciliation before a specific seat in the Senate constituted a 41st vote to block the legislation (ie, Scott Brown)? It was a spectacle then, and the media was perfectly fine with it. If Trump did anything like that today, the folks at CNN would be fit to be tied.
Just another example of glaring media bias.
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Closely mirror used loosely... the wall is 5-10 points more unpopular at each end than Obamacare was. Obamacare’s effects are a hell of a lot easier to quantify too so public opinion probably wouldn’t flip the way it did for Obamacare.bmw wrote: ↑Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:33 pmSaw this chart today in an anti-wall piece by CNN today:
Immediately when I saw those numbers I knew they looked awfully familiar. That is because they are - they very closely mirror public approval of Obamacare before it was passed in 2010.
Yet I don't seem to recall CNN back then posting daily articles opposing Obamacare on the ground that Americans don't want it like they are today with Trump's wall. Can you even begin to imagine how CNN would cover the wall if Trump were to get it built the same way Obamacare got passed? ie, by passing a bill through the House that nobody wanted and then ramming it through the Senate, on Christmas Eve, during a snowstorm, to avoid reconciliation before a specific seat in the Senate constituted a 41st vote to block the legislation (ie, Scott Brown)? It was a spectacle then, and the media was perfectly fine with it. If Trump did anything like that today, the folks at CNN would be fit to be tied.
Just another example of glaring media bias.
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
The average support in both instances is within a point or two, and margin of opposition is double digits. So are you suggesting that if people opposed the wall by a 51-40 margin instead of 56-39 that the media and the left (redundant, I know) would magically support a wall?
-
- Posts: 3122
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:08 pm
- Location: Novi, MI
- Contact:
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
When will you all wake up and realize that this is all propaganda/distraction/entertainment?
The government and everyone in it is merely a puppet for the higher ups: Rothschilds, Royal Family, Freemasons, etc.
Trump is a great actor.
There is no *real* border wall debate.
There will be a wall though, but it won't be to "keep out immigrants", if you get what I mean.
Big things are to occur in the coming months.
Start preparing for 6 months with no power..now..and not being entertained by "News".
The government and everyone in it is merely a puppet for the higher ups: Rothschilds, Royal Family, Freemasons, etc.
Trump is a great actor.
There is no *real* border wall debate.
There will be a wall though, but it won't be to "keep out immigrants", if you get what I mean.
Big things are to occur in the coming months.
Start preparing for 6 months with no power..now..and not being entertained by "News".
Music is my life.
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Oh lord, the tin foil hat brigade is here...
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
So, your angle is to take a CNN analysis of one thing, and compare it to a RealClearPolitics analysis of another thing, and expect to make a point out of the mishmash.
-
- Posts: 3122
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:08 pm
- Location: Novi, MI
- Contact:
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Right, think what you want.
It only affects you.
However, I will point you towards the 93 page document the government actually released a month ago about preparing for an extended blackout.
I've known about this for a year.
Don't be an ignorant sheep.
Project Blue Beam will be THE endgame for the NWO and the biggest false flag attack on all of mankind.
Aliens do not exist. Please remember that sentence very very well.
It only affects you.
However, I will point you towards the 93 page document the government actually released a month ago about preparing for an extended blackout.
I've known about this for a year.
Don't be an ignorant sheep.
Project Blue Beam will be THE endgame for the NWO and the biggest false flag attack on all of mankind.
Aliens do not exist. Please remember that sentence very very well.
Music is my life.
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Why don’t you go study why that guy Tim is really using all your ideas and torturing you with the Breeze or something...stopnswop2 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:45 amRight, think what you want.
It only affects you.
However, I will point you towards the 93 page document the government actually released a month ago about preparing for an extended blackout.
I've known about this for a year.
Don't be an ignorant sheep.
Project Blue Beam will be THE endgame for the NWO and the biggest false flag attack on all of mankind.
Aliens do not exist. Please remember that sentence very very well.
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Why are there so many fucking weirdos in this place?
-
- Posts: 2778
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Which place? The Michigan Buzzboard?
The meant-to-insult moniker “weirdos” is often sighted as those who do not agree with previous posters.
BTW if there’s a mega electrical black out in the US it’s probably due to Putin. As he’s already suspected in other big but less sweeping blackouts in our nation. So called trial runs. Well encompassed in Russia’s and the former Soviet government’s publically announced campaign to “destroy” The United States “from within.”
And now the very evidentury info arrives that President Trump has been/is being investigated as a possible Russian asset. So then - Trump might already know of a sweeping black out coming. Because at the very least he's hoping for some issue to distract from the boiling self-poured water in which he’s currently sputtering and drowning.
The meant-to-insult moniker “weirdos” is often sighted as those who do not agree with previous posters.
BTW if there’s a mega electrical black out in the US it’s probably due to Putin. As he’s already suspected in other big but less sweeping blackouts in our nation. So called trial runs. Well encompassed in Russia’s and the former Soviet government’s publically announced campaign to “destroy” The United States “from within.”
And now the very evidentury info arrives that President Trump has been/is being investigated as a possible Russian asset. So then - Trump might already know of a sweeping black out coming. Because at the very least he's hoping for some issue to distract from the boiling self-poured water in which he’s currently sputtering and drowning.
Last edited by screen glare on Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
Yes... here. Doomsday preppers, people squawking about "the Illuminati" and "NWO" and "false flags". It's hilarious.screen glare wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:31 pmWhich place? The Michigan Buzzboard?
“Weirdos” are often sighted as those who do not agree with with a previous poster.
Re: Media coverage of Obamacare in 2010 vs Trump's wall today
The internet is the haven for the anonymous fringes mainly on the right...Motown322 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:56 pmYes... here. Doomsday preppers, people squawking about "the Illuminati" and "NWO" and "false flags". It's hilarious.screen glare wrote: ↑Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:31 pmWhich place? The Michigan Buzzboard?
“Weirdos” are often sighted as those who do not agree with with a previous poster.