Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
They are like children throwing a tantrum when they don't get what they want.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
That's funny as hell, you're right, she does have a horse face!
Unfortunately she's also as stubborn as a mule.
Unfortunately she's also as stubborn as a mule.
You're never too old to learn something stupid.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
This has less support than last time. Of course the Democrats will happily vote for it because getting a new speaker would be embarrassingly chaotic for the GOP.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
There's at least a few House Democrats on record saying they would vote against ousting him.
If MTG wasn't such a nutjob, I would say she at least has a valid criticism (that Johnson brought the bill to a floor vote without majority support of his own party and without 72 hours to read the legislation), but Republicans can't afford politically to go through this again.
If MTG wasn't such a nutjob, I would say she at least has a valid criticism (that Johnson brought the bill to a floor vote without majority support of his own party and without 72 hours to read the legislation), but Republicans can't afford politically to go through this again.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
Let's het MTG as a speaker please...
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
― Matt
Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
That would be entertaining
- Colonel Flagg
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
Hey, why not?
Johnson strikes me as being a right-leaning fruitcake. Byron Donalds would have been a much better choice than Johnson.
"Don't you knock when you enter a room?"
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
Are you suggesting he's as much of a trump ballwasher as you are?Colonel Flagg wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:24 amHey, why not?
Johnson strikes me as being a right-leaning fruitcake. Byron Donalds would have been a much better choice than Johnson.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
A black Republican speaker… not on your life.Colonel Flagg wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:24 amHey, why not?
Johnson strikes me as being a right-leaning fruitcake. Byron Donalds would have been a much better choice than Johnson.
- Colonel Flagg
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
Exactly. To people of your ilk, he would just be another "Uncle Tom"Rate This wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:11 pmA black Republican speaker… not on your life.Colonel Flagg wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:24 amHey, why not?
Johnson strikes me as being a right-leaning fruitcake. Byron Donalds would have been a much better choice than Johnson.
"Don't you knock when you enter a room?"
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
I don’t buy that they would even come close to picking a black man. This is the same reason Tim Scott likely is a no go for veep.Colonel Flagg wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 5:40 pmExactly. To people of your ilk, he would just be another "Uncle Tom"Rate This wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:11 pmA black Republican speaker… not on your life.Colonel Flagg wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:24 amHey, why not?
Johnson strikes me as being a right-leaning fruitcake. Byron Donalds would have been a much better choice than Johnson.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
Are you suggesting that all other factors equal, Republicans would pick the white person over the black person solely over skin color and gender?
Aside from you having no evidence of this being the case, at least Republicans don't go around publicly stating that people of a certain skin color and gender are not in consideration for certain high positions of power as Joe Biden did by eliminating 94% of the population from consideration of a SCOTUS opening solely on that basis.
Aside from you having no evidence of this being the case, at least Republicans don't go around publicly stating that people of a certain skin color and gender are not in consideration for certain high positions of power as Joe Biden did by eliminating 94% of the population from consideration of a SCOTUS opening solely on that basis.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
I’m suggesting the base would go ballistic if they did that and so it stops them in their tracks. These are the same people who went ballistic when we elected Obama by a landslide. They want nothing to do with it.bmw wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:01 amAre you suggesting that all other factors equal, Republicans would pick the white person over the black person solely over skin color and gender?
Aside from you having no evidence of this being the case, at least Republicans don't go around publicly stating that people of a certain skin color and gender are not in consideration for certain high positions of power as Joe Biden did by eliminating 94% of the population from consideration of a SCOTUS opening solely on that basis.
Re: Mr. Ed wants to remove Speaker Johnson
In the vast majority of cases, Republicans not being a fan of Obama had nothing to do with his skin color and everything to do with his politics.
Your blatant accusations of racism are (again with the caveat that I'm talking about a vast majority and not every single person) without merit.
Your blatant accusations of racism are (again with the caveat that I'm talking about a vast majority and not every single person) without merit.