Now two years later, saying they offer little to no protection against covid.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/health/c ... index.html
We're wearing masks to protect those who refuse to protect themselves. In Ontario it's mandatory.
Boosted and wearing a mask. Mandatory is places with the lowest spread rates... Omicron may change this, but until the data is our, it's Honeywell N95 for me...
Oh, so you mean the science we were implored to trust the past almost two years is now untrustworthy?SoutheastMIViewer wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 11:42 amOh man what joke. These so called medical experts spent so much propaganda showing the country how the cloth masks offered protection against covid with gimmick videos and discussions
Now two years later, saying they offer little to no protection against covid.![]()
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/health/c ... index.html
It changes as new data come in and studies are done. It’s not some static thing. This isn’t a religion. The fact that recommendations keep changing means it’s working as it is supposed to.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 1:05 pmOh, so you mean the science we were implored to trust the past almost two years is now untrustworthy?SoutheastMIViewer wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 11:42 amOh man what joke. These so called medical experts spent so much propaganda showing the country how the cloth masks offered protection against covid with gimmick videos and discussions
Now two years later, saying they offer little to no protection against covid.![]()
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/health/c ... index.html
Another way to look at it is that the one-time accepted science was wrong.Rate This wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 1:09 pmIt changes as new data come in and studies are done. It’s not some static thing. This isn’t a religion. The fact that recommendations keep changing means it’s working as it is supposed to.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 1:05 pmOh, so you mean the science we were implored to trust the past almost two years is now untrustworthy?SoutheastMIViewer wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 11:42 amOh man what joke. These so called medical experts spent so much propaganda showing the country how the cloth masks offered protection against covid with gimmick videos and discussions
Now two years later, saying they offer little to no protection against covid.![]()
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/health/c ... index.html
Exactly, I agree 100%. Then why should anyone "trust the science" when it comes to any of this? Vaccines, masks, societal shutdowns - people are tired of being misled and then vilified if they dare question the science.Rate This wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 1:09 pmIt changes as new data come in and studies are done. It’s not some static thing. This isn’t a religion. The fact that recommendations keep changing means it’s working as it is supposed to.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 1:05 pmOh, so you mean the science we were implored to trust the past almost two years is now untrustworthy?SoutheastMIViewer wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 11:42 amOh man what joke. These so called medical experts spent so much propaganda showing the country how the cloth masks offered protection against covid with gimmick videos and discussions
Now two years later, saying they offer little to no protection against covid.![]()
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/health/c ... index.html
Welcome back. Lucky. Your sidekick LL is back too.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 1:51 pm
Exactly, I agree 100%. Then why should anyone "trust the science" when it comes to any of this? Vaccines, masks, societal shutdowns - people are tired of being misled and then vilified if they dare question the science.
If you're boosted and wearing a mask where you are not required to do so, you are virtue signaling.
Reagan4prez wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 2:28 pmMasks are simply political theater, just like the TSA.
The TSA has stopped exactly zero acts of terrorism, but yet people feel “safe” because they have to go through an unconstitutional screening process.
Masks provide zero protection, but the naive believe “at least we’re doing something.”
And then there’s the self-righteous “I’m doing this for you.” How cute.
LOL!Rate This wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 1:09 pmIt changes as new data come in and studies are done. It’s not some static thing. This isn’t a religion. The fact that recommendations keep changing means it’s working as it is supposed to.Graham Wellington wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 1:05 pmOh, so you mean the science we were implored to trust the past almost two years is now untrustworthy?SoutheastMIViewer wrote: ↑Fri Dec 24, 2021 11:42 amOh man what joke. These so called medical experts spent so much propaganda showing the country how the cloth masks offered protection against covid with gimmick videos and discussions
Now two years later, saying they offer little to no protection against covid.![]()
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/24/health/c ... index.html