Acceptable registrations in the queue through June 3 at 5:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Porn Wife interiors

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
screen glare
Posts: 2778
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:05 am

Re: Porn Wife interiors

Post by screen glare » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:14 pm

Answer? Yes. A first lady of the united states - posing for porn photos to earn money in the smut trade and thereby destroy any hope of a dignified reputation - BY FAR tops any other FLOTUS's negative background detail - real - OR IMAGINED. Not even a contest!


However - when it comes to 240 years of MALE POTUS's? Well - there's a pile of moral manure as tall as Everest to remember.



Deleted User 8570

Re: Porn Wife interiors

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:50 pm

Y M Ionhere wrote:Is a hot immigrant first-lady THAT much worse than a first-lady whose college thesis paper is sealed and allegedly contains possible racism?
Is an immigrant with seductive photos THAT much worse than a first-lady who admitted she wasnt proud of her country until her husband was nominated?
Whoa there Sparky... who said she was hot?

jry
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:14 am
Location: somewhere in the former boonies

Re: Porn Wife interiors

Post by jry » Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:03 pm

[quote="Bryce"][quote="screen glare"]Bryce-lice - you slay me. [/quote]
I'm here all week. Make sure to try the veal.
[quote="screen glare"] Talk about having a destructive role model for our pre-teen and teen boys and girls.[/quote]
Great roll models abound in the oval orifice.

Like the roll model who taught kids that blow jobs aren't really sex along with his own special way of flavoring cigars?[/quote]

It's more like a "roll in the hay" model....

Someone posted a photo of WJC being worked on by The Energizer Bunny, on Twitter. I've asked the poster about its authenticity and who shot it. It's Bill, no doubt. Just not sure that it's a shop. He's sitting on the bed, disrobed. She is still in her kind of revealing jammies. It looks real.

jry
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:14 am
Location: somewhere in the former boonies

Re: Porn Wife interiors

Post by jry » Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:42 pm


User avatar
moldyoldie
Posts: 1698
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 1:04 am
Location: On that thar' interweb jobber

Re: Porn Wife interiors

Post by moldyoldie » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:32 am

jry wrote:Let's see if this works.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxWUPDmXAAIpA6A.jpg
Too easy to debunk.

http://www.snopes.com/bill-clinton-in-the-nude/
Snopes.com wrote:This photograph was actually taken by Alison Jackson, a photographer known for using lookalikes to create images purportedly showing celebrities.

Jackson writes on her web site that she uses lookalikes to create "intimate, often salacious, imagined private moments" of media icons like Marilyn Monroe, George Bush, and Bill Clinton:

Alison Jackson is renown for her explorations into how photography and the cult of the celebrity have transformed our relationship to what is ‘real’. Her notorious photographic portraits, life-like sculptures, films and videos are startlingly realistically staged affairs that cast uncannily styled actors into an entirely fathomable projection of a future that could have been; or the intimate, often salacious, imagined private moments of media icons such as Diana Princess of Wales, the Queen of England, Marilyn Monroe, George Bush, Brad and Angelina, and David Beckham. Jackson’s productions stress-test the implicit belief that a photograph can capture a frozen moment of ‘truth’.

‘At best, a photograph of a celebrity reproduces something authentic only at the very moment the shutter clicks’ says the artist ‘yet we have been teased into giving these moments an absolute and unquestioned authority. However, what we actually do is create a narcissistic circle where we assert our control over the object of desire: we transform our celebrities into what we want. This whole projective process is further exaggerated by our capacity for fantasy and the inherently titillating nature of the image of a celebrity like Marilyn in flagrante. In this way, my productions, charged with desire, have become more real than the real life model they are based on, evolving into a ‘mental image’ rather than a direct record of reality’
"The primary purpose of a liberal education is to make one's mind a pleasant place in which to spend one's leisure."
- Sydney J. Harris

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic