All accepted registrations through October 6 at 7:30a ET have been activated. Thank you! -M.W.

Please note: Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=48619

All user accounts that have been inactive since January 1, 2017 have been expunged. If you are one of these users and wish to submit a new post, please re-register. Thank you.

Just how bad are the Lions?

No $8 beers here... just a place to discuss your favorite Sports Teams, classic & current events in the world of sports, and share your Sports knowledge!
User avatar
MWmetalhead
Site Admin
Posts: 5046
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by MWmetalhead » Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:12 pm

Jim Bob Cooter = OVERRATED!!!!!

Offense's production has been pathetic four of the past five weeks.


Greta Thunberg is a snot nosed brat who needs to STFU.

Deleted User 8570

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:31 pm

MWmetalhead wrote:Jim Bob Cooter = OVERRATED!!!!!

Offense's production has been pathetic four of the past five weeks.
Not to excuse anything but the officiating was equally embarrassing. Our defense crumbled. The Seahawks got a bogus touchdown. Ugh. Such is life as a Lions fan.

What was with the lack of a roughing the passer or any other foul when the two Seahawks had stafford up in the air like he was a piece of lumber and dropped him late in the game? They penalized that tap on Wilsons shoulder...

Hopefully this is not a one year and done stay in the playoff ranks...



bmw
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by bmw » Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:54 pm

MWmetalhead wrote:Jim Bob Cooter = OVERRATED!!!!!

Offense's production has been pathetic four of the past five weeks.
That is absolutely not Cooter's fault. Stafford has been injured for about that same time frame, not to mention their opponents have been Dallas, New York Giants, Green Bay, and Seattle - 4 of the top 5 teams in the NFC.

And if anybody, I blame their defense who has given up 99 points in the past 3 games (hard to win when your defense is giving up 33 points per game)



bmw
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by bmw » Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:58 pm

NS8401 wrote:The Seahawks got a bogus touchdown.
Everyone seems to have already forgotten that Detroit also had a pass interference penalty on that play so I think they would have just offset and re-ran the 4th and goal all over again.
What was with the lack of a roughing the passer or any other foul when the two Seahawks had stafford up in the air like he was a piece of lumber and dropped him late in the game?
PLUS that was after the whistle! Absolutely a bad no-call, I couldn't believe that one either.

-----------

Bottom line was, tonight was VINTAGE LIONS. Dropped balls. Can't stop the run. Stupid penalties. Lack of discipline. Lack of offense. Repeatedly giving up 3rd and eternity. Pretty much summed up the over 50 years of Ford ownership of this team.



bmw
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by bmw » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:05 am

Another gripe I have - WHY IN THE HELL DOES ROBERTS KEEP BRINGING KICKOFFS OUT OF THE END ZONE? He has SUCKED at this all season - why does their special teams coach keep letting him do it? I would argue that turning point in the game (or at least the moment when it got away from them) was about mid 3rd quarter, Detroit only down 13-6 after holding Seattle to a field goal, and Roberts brings the kickoff out of the end zone to the 17 yard line. Quick 3 and out and the rest is history.



Deleted User 8570

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:26 am

bmw wrote:Another gripe I have - WHY IN THE HELL DOES ROBERTS KEEP BRINGING KICKOFFS OUT OF THE END ZONE? He has SUCKED at this all season - why does their special teams coach keep letting him do it? I would argue that turning point in the game (or at least the moment when it got away from them) was about mid 3rd quarter, Detroit only down 13-6 after holding Seattle to a field goal, and Roberts brings the kickoff out of the end zone to the 17 yard line. Quick 3 and out and the rest is history.
I would take the consistency of the 25 rather than run it out every time. As for the TD... I doubt they'd go for it again if they replayed that 4th down... that's what I was getting at... 6-3 not 10-3 at half. A bit of a different scenario.



User avatar
MWmetalhead
Site Admin
Posts: 5046
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by MWmetalhead » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:28 am

Nah, they would've gone for it again.

How did you like that play call by Jim Bob on 4th and 1 right before halftime?

How did you like his decision to abandon the run in the prior two games after it worked decently in the first half of those games?

Sorry, but his true colors are showing. Lions have scored a TOTAL of 13 points in the second halves of the last four games combined!!!!

I could give two shits about the officiating. Yes, there were two horrendous no calls. That's not the reason the Lions lost. Seattle is a better team. Period. Their play on the field reflected that fact. The Lions are a C team who played like a D- or F team.

Stafford's numbers against teams who made the postseason are horrendous. Not suggesting that's all on him. It's evidence of an overall pathetic organization.


Greta Thunberg is a snot nosed brat who needs to STFU.

User avatar
MWmetalhead
Site Admin
Posts: 5046
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by MWmetalhead » Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:25 am

This stupid organization wasted a 1st round pick on Eric Ebron.

This stupid organization wasted a 1st round pick on Laken Tomlinson, who sucks so bad (and is so horrendously out of shape) that he often doesn't start on an O-Line that isn't very good to begin with!!!


Greta Thunberg is a snot nosed brat who needs to STFU.

bmw
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by bmw » Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:42 am

MWmetalhead wrote:How did you like that play call by Jim Bob on 4th and 1 right before halftime?

How did you like his decision to abandon the run in the prior two games after it worked decently in the first half of those games?
I'm not saying he hasn't made some really bad decisions, I'm just saying they have far bigger problems than that. Just like how the officials made some bad no calls (and especially no-calls) but those in and of themselves didn't cost Detroit the game.

Also RE: Eric Ebron - how do you classify him as a wasted pick? He ranks #7 in the league in yards per game at 54.7 and #10 in the league in receptions at 61. He also has ZERO career fumbles. Hard for me to say he was a wasted pick when he's a top 10 tight end in the NFL based on raw receptions and yards.



bmw
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by bmw » Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:47 am

Another gripe that I haven't heard ANYBODY mention, and that is Detroit's clock management right at the end of the first half.

Situation: Detroit kicks off to Seattle with 0:20 seconds left, Seattle stupidly brings it out of the end zone and only gets to the 12 yard line. Detroit has all 3 timeouts. Seattle takes a knee at 0:17. Detroit COULD have used all 3 timeouts to force a Seattle punt from deep in their own territory with a few seconds left, fair caught the punt with no time left on the clock, and sent out Prater for a long attempt at a free kick. Yes this is an obscure rule that is rarely used but this was the EXACT situation it was designed for. The fact that nobody on the Detroit sideline was seemingly aware of this is troubling.



Deleted User 8570

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:11 am

bmw wrote:Another gripe that I haven't heard ANYBODY mention, and that is Detroit's clock management right at the end of the first half.

Situation: Detroit kicks off to Seattle with 0:20 seconds left, Seattle stupidly brings it out of the end zone and only gets to the 12 yard line. Detroit has all 3 timeouts. Seattle takes a knee at 0:17. Detroit COULD have used all 3 timeouts to force a Seattle punt from deep in their own territory with a few seconds left, fair caught the punt with no time left on the clock, and sent out Prater for a long attempt at a free kick. Yes this is an obscure rule that is rarely used but this was the EXACT situation it was designed for. The fact that nobody on the Detroit sideline was seemingly aware of this is troubling.
Why are you naive enough to think Seattle is friendly enough to take more knees against us if we start calling timeouts? They would have ran that 17 seconds out -- literally. We never would have had a snowballs chance in hell at getting to the point of a free kick being makeable. You're grasping at straws. That's why nobody came up with it but you.



User avatar
MWmetalhead
Site Admin
Posts: 5046
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by MWmetalhead » Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:29 am

Also RE: Eric Ebron - how do you classify him as a wasted pick? He ranks #7 in the league in yards per game at 54.7 and #10 in the league in receptions at 61. He also has ZERO career fumbles.
#10 out of 32 players is good but definitely not great.

My point is this - he would've still been on the board in the third round. The Lions could've "had their cake & eaten it, too," in other words.

Where does he rank relative to his peers with regard to percentage of dropped passes?
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... roEr00.htm

Yes, he's performed much better in that area these past two seasons, but he's still not great. And the problem is a lot of the passes he drops ARE RIGHT IN HIS FRIGGIN' HANDS!!!

I will say he is trending in the right direction. 2016 was a good season for him - I don't dismiss that. But he's also had faults. Worthy of a 3rd round pick? Yes, absolutely. First round? Absolutely not.


Greta Thunberg is a snot nosed brat who needs to STFU.

Deleted User 8570

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:56 am

MWmetalhead wrote:
Also RE: Eric Ebron - how do you classify him as a wasted pick? He ranks #7 in the league in yards per game at 54.7 and #10 in the league in receptions at 61. He also has ZERO career fumbles.
#10 out of 32 players is good but definitely not great.

My point is this - he would've still been on the board in the third round. The Lions could've "had their cake & eaten it, too," in other words.

Where does he rank relative to his peers with regard to percentage of dropped passes?
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... roEr00.htm

Yes, he's performed much better in that area these past two seasons, but he's still not great. And the problem is a lot of the passes he drops ARE RIGHT IN HIS FRIGGIN' HANDS!!!

I will say he is trending in the right direction. 2016 was a good season for him - I don't dismiss that. But he's also had faults. Worthy of a 3rd round pick? Yes, absolutely. First round? Absolutely not.
Every drop is right in the players hands...



bmw
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by bmw » Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:59 am

NS8401 wrote:Why are you naive enough to think Seattle is friendly enough to take more knees against us if we start calling timeouts? They would have ran that 17 seconds out -- literally. We never would have had a snowballs chance in hell at getting to the point of a free kick being makeable. You're grasping at straws. That's why nobody came up with it but you.
They had already taken a knee at 0:17. That runs the clock down to 0:16 or 0:15. So its already 2nd down. It is not easy to burn 0:15 seconds of clock in just 2 plays, at least not if you're being conservative, and especially when you've already mentally headed to the locker room. So it would have most likely made it to 4th down with at least a few seconds left. At that point, Seattle has a tough decision to make - try to burn those last few seconds and risk a turnover on downs deep in their own territory with 0:01 second left, or punt. My point is, there was virtually no danger whatsoever in taking those timeouts because Seattle was almost guaranteed to not score, but Detroit at least had a chance at 3 points before the half.
Last edited by bmw on Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.



bmw
Posts: 1248
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:02 am

Re: Just how bad are the Lions?

Post by bmw » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:04 am

MWmetalhead wrote:My point is this - he would've still been on the board in the third round. The Lions could've "had their cake & eaten it, too," in other words....Worthy of a 3rd round pick? Yes, absolutely. First round? Absolutely not.
Are you kidding me? Every pre-draft board I can find on google had Ebron listed as a mid first-round pick, as high as #8 overall. And Detroit took him at #10. It is easy to look back and say he wasn't worthy of that pick, but at the time, that is where he was ranked. No way he would have still been available in the 3rd round. Early 2nd round at the absolute latest.

That said, I generally agree with the remainder of your assessment on Ebron.



Post Reply Previous topicNext topic