https://www.arealme.com/iq/en/
I got 145… what do I win? I still can’t get images to work on here though but that makes me feel way better than the 78 I got once.bmw wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:39 pmhttps://www.arealme.com/iq/en/
It is 20 questions and I think if you take the default test you'll get the same 20 questions I got. No signup or email, it just gives you a result when you're done (after asking you a few demographic questions like age).
Well… we will need some more volunteers then. Considering how many people are on earth how many groups of 500 are there to pull two people from? It may not actually be that hard to get two really smart people in one spot.bmw wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:51 pmThat makes us either statistically the 2 smartest people on this message board (and then some), or something is up with that test. The distribution curve for that particular test CLAIMS to have an average of 100 and fit a bell curve. Actual IQ's of 143 and 145 are like, 1 in 500 people.
Pass the links along if you can, I’d like to take a crack at the ones you do.bmw wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:09 pmI took the 2015 version and scored a 225/315. Not sure how that translate to an IQ but that was the score it gave me.
I took the 2016 version and got a 141 general IQ (140 for visual, 140 for logic, 144 for number).
I may take the other tests over the next few days.
You are really pretty funny. Since only two people have taken the test, I would suggest that you two are statistically average.bmw wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:51 pmThat makes us either statistically the 2 smartest people on this message board (and then some), or something is up with that test. The distribution curve for that particular test CLAIMS to have an average of 100 and fit a bell curve. Actual IQ's of 143 and 145 are like, 1 in 500 people.
That depends on whether you believe the claims on the website. It claims that over 28 million people worldwide have taken their IQ tests (including nearly 5 million having taken that exact test) and that the average score is 100.7 worldwide and that the test results almost perfectly fit a bell curve. IF that is true, then RT's and my results are both in the 99.8 percentile. That said, the odds of 2 random people getting that score are about 1 in 225,000. Then again, people who post in a politics forum on the internet aren't exactly pulled from a "random" group either. Nevertheless, It would be interesting to see at least a few other people post results here. Problem with that is that a few people here may have already taken the test, gotten a low or average score, and decided not to post it here. So we'll never really know how "legit" this test is.
Yes, and Rome wasn't built in a day. So what?Rate This wrote:You realize that Tesla for a very long time was a company with massive investment going in and virtually no profit coming out right?
No, I'm not suggesting anything of the sort, you are.Rate This wrote:Are you suggesting the guy is simply so smart that the rest of us are too stupid to get the name he gave his kid but that it’s actually genius?
Rate This wrote:Oh and by the way… IQ doesn’t mean anything. It’s a bullshit metric that doesn’t actually quantify someone’s intelligence or lack thereof.
Whatever you say. I'm sure MENSA members would take exception.I'm finding it amusing that folks on this thread are actually giving credence to some free online "test" whose purpose is to appeal to one's ego and sense of self-worth.Rate This wrote:I once, on a really off day, tried a test… I got… 78. It’s probably closer to 110 or so.
Amazing. I do hope all of you are doing this for fun, and only fun.That 78 was not on an internet test but an actual clinical test when I was 10.moldyoldie wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 9:04 amYes, and Rome wasn't built in a day. So what?Rate This wrote:You realize that Tesla for a very long time was a company with massive investment going in and virtually no profit coming out right?
No, I'm not suggesting anything of the sort, you are.Rate This wrote:Are you suggesting the guy is simply so smart that the rest of us are too stupid to get the name he gave his kid but that it’s actually genius?
Rate This wrote:Oh and by the way… IQ doesn’t mean anything. It’s a bullshit metric that doesn’t actually quantify someone’s intelligence or lack thereof.
I'm finding it amusing that folks on this thread are actually giving credence to some free online "test" whose purpose is to appeal to one's ego and sense of self-worth.Rate This wrote:I once, on a really off day, tried a test… I got… 78. It’s probably closer to 110 or so.
X, the company formerly known as Twitter, handed out stock grants to employees on Monday that showed it was worth about $19 billion, down about 55 percent from the $44 billion that Elon Musk paid to buy the firm a year ago, according to internal documents seen by The New York Times.
Mr. Musk paid $54.20 a share to buy Twitter just over a year ago. The tech billionaire has since said he overpaid for the social network. In March, he wrote in an email to workers that he believed the company was worth $20 billion, calling it “an inverse start-up.”
In the paperwork for the new stock grants, X said the equity would be offered at $45 a share in the form of restricted stock units, which employees can earn over time. Employees will still be paid in cash in the amount of $54.20 for any outstanding shares that were granted to them under previous management, the company said.
It’s unclear why the share price has not dropped by the same percentage as the company’s valuation, though X could have altered the amount of shares outstanding. Fortune earlier reported on the valuation.
A spokesman for X did not return a request for comment.
Explains many things.
