They used to use FM BCB Transmitters for tracking animals. The transmitters were detectable for miles, using multielement Yagis. Are these still legal in the United States? They can't be within legal radiation limits, unless there are exceptions for research of this type.
It used to be no problem finding vacant channels. Now the band is jammed. I imagine you could use 87.75 MHz in some areas. The researcher I knew used the receiver as an FM radio in his office when not tracking animals.
Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 12 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
FM BC Band Animal Tracking Transmitters
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:06 am
FM BC Band Animal Tracking Transmitters
Kennelly Heaviside. The best Technical Consultant no money can buy.
Re: FM BC Band Animal Tracking Transmitters
Someone somewhere may have used the BCB FM frequencies, but for the last 30 years, there are dozens of 160-170 MHz freqs that are used. And the signals only transmit for 10 ms every 5 or 10 minutes for birds, much more often for really large and dangerous animals.
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2021 12:06 am
Re: FM BC Band Animal Tracking Transmitters
Mecosta County, circa 1980. Granted, this is 40 years ago. But in China, they track Pandas with FM BC antennas and receivers. I've seen pictures in National Geographic, more recently than 30 years ago. The size of the Yagi elements were too long for the 160-170 MHz band, as elements were almost as tall as they were.bosco wrote: ↑Mon Oct 04, 2021 9:13 amSomeone somewhere may have used the BCB FM frequencies, but for the last 30 years, there are dozens of 160-170 MHz freqs that are used. And the signals only transmit for 10 ms every 5 or 10 minutes for birds, much more often for really large and dangerous animals.
Kennelly Heaviside. The best Technical Consultant no money can buy.
Re: FM BC Band Animal Tracking Transmitters
Hmm.
I guess the equipment would be cheap, but 72-75 mHz would be a lot better choice.
I guess the equipment would be cheap, but 72-75 mHz would be a lot better choice.
The box that many broadcasters won’t look outside of was made in 1969 and hasn’t changed significantly since.
Re: FM BC Band Animal Tracking Transmitters
The ranger in the photo posted, sure is holding a 150-170 MHz Yagi antenna !
If you went to 72-75 MHz, the Yagi antennas would be roughly twice that size.
Not so good for tracking in the field.
If you went to 72-75 MHz, the Yagi antennas would be roughly twice that size.
Not so good for tracking in the field.
Re: FM BC Band Animal Tracking Transmitters
If the movie "Star Trek IV" has any accuracy, the humpback whales were fitted with transmitters for 406MHz IIRC? Funny thing about that movie is when Scotty was trying to use an Apple Computer, it had a 1986 wired mouse on it, and used the mouse like a microphone for voice recognition and everyone in the theater laughed; now we do talk to our computers/phones/'communicators' (and it never gets the damn voice to text correct).