Acceptable registrations in the queue through March 30 at 9:00a ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Search found 45 matches

by Rich
Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:09 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: WWJ signal problems? (+ WJR audio distortion)
Replies: 79
Views: 14529

Re: WWJ signal problems?

Hopefully, Rich will check in on this. As I have heard, WJR still has two tube 50 kW transmitters out there in Riverview, and they sound better than the solid state ones. ... Well, better most likely is the subjective conclusion of listeners based on what their ears tell them, and which for them, t...
by Rich
Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:59 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: FCCdata.org Now Has Skywave Contours
Replies: 7
Views: 2612

Re: FCCdata.org Now Has Skywave Contours

Another approach to showing nighttime contours is to revert to the groundwave contour of that station at locations where its skywave is weaker than its groundwave. Of course that doesn't mean that such signals will not have serious interference from co- and adjacent-channel stations. The plot of the...
by Rich
Fri Sep 13, 2019 6:52 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: FCCdata.org Now Has Skywave Contours
Replies: 7
Views: 2612

Re: FCCdata.org Now Has Skywave Contours

Thanks for update about FCCData.org.

Surprising that the 0.5 mV/m nighttime skywave contour for WWJ and I suppose other nighttime DAs appears on the map for very short distances from the transmit site where a returning skywave is virtually zero, though.
by Rich
Thu Aug 08, 2019 5:43 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: Shortwave - WBCQ new 500kW transmitter on 9330kHz
Replies: 8
Views: 3476

Re: Shortwave - WBCQ new 500kW transmitter on 9330kHz

Ed Joseph wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 3:04 pm
I guess since the people bankrolling the operation are flat-earthers, ... how do they explain global skywave???
Maybe they believe that a flat Earth gives them line-of-sight propagation paths to all "global" locations ?
by Rich
Tue Jul 30, 2019 6:54 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: Reduced ERP from "Overheight" FM Stations
Replies: 18
Views: 5200

Re: Reduced ERP from "Overheight" FM Stations

Additional: The mounting environment of an FM transmit antenna has a very significant effect on its radiation patterns, as the tower structure and other re-radiators near the antenna aperture become part of the antenna system. The image below shows these effects for one case by comparing the radiati...
by Rich
Mon Jul 29, 2019 9:20 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: Reduced ERP from "Overheight" FM Stations
Replies: 18
Views: 5200

Re: Reduced ERP from "Overheight" FM Stations

The radiation pattern on the left side of the image below shows an extreme example of the pattern distortion than can result from mounting a stock, "omnidirectional" FM antenna on the side of a large-faced tower.

Image
by Rich
Mon Jul 29, 2019 8:18 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: Reduced ERP from "Overheight" FM Stations
Replies: 18
Views: 5200

Re: Reduced ERP from "Overheight" FM Stations

Remember that there are only one or two azimuths of a DA that have the full measured maximum field ratio. All other directions are less than maximum, regardless of the licensed pattern envelope field ratios. That is true. Directional FMs are licensed for the maximum ERP they may radiate in the hori...
by Rich
Wed Jul 24, 2019 6:19 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: Reduced ERP from "Overheight" FM Stations
Replies: 18
Views: 5200

Reduced ERP from "Overheight" FM Stations

FM stations with antenna heights greater than the HAAT permitted for their Class of station must reduce their ERP to provide a radius to their 1 mV/m field contours equal to that of a station exactly meeting the maximum ERP and HAAT authorized for that Class. As an illustration of this, below is a c...
by Rich
Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:57 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: Another Good Resource On Indoor vs. Outdoor Antennas
Replies: 4
Views: 1811

Re: Another Good Resource On Indoor vs. Outdoor Antennas

Proper orientation of a directional TV receiving antenna will ensure optimal reliability... True, and sometimes the most useful orientation is not in the direction one expects. For example, when I lived at the north end of Lincoln Park along the Lake Michigan shoreline in Chicago (late 1960s) and a...
by Rich
Mon Jul 22, 2019 4:56 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: Another Good Resource On Indoor vs. Outdoor Antennas
Replies: 4
Views: 1811

Re: Another Good Resource On Indoor vs. Outdoor Antennas

... Preamps are noisy, and don't give you gain like noise free gain from antenna placement and gain Another benefit can result from using a directional outdoor antenna. It can reduce interfering signals arriving from co- and adjacent-channel stations with compass bearings well away from the directi...
by Rich
Sat Jun 15, 2019 10:06 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI
Replies: 22
Views: 4980

Re: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI

Here is a study using NEC4.2 set for an Earth conductivity of 8 mS/m: The WWJ 186° radiator at 8 Mile Rd used alone, and driven with 5 kW would generate about a 20.6 mV/m field in Grosse Pointe, MI (a 14 mile path at N107°E). The 186° radiator used alone and driven with 1 kW would generate a field o...
by Rich
Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:22 pm
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI
Replies: 22
Views: 4980

Re: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI

CK-722 wrote:
Fri Jun 14, 2019 3:58 pm
As far as I can see, the pattern can be reconstructed from the data on fccinfo, ...
Below is an easy way out by taking the pattern from the fccinfo page and adding some text labels to it.

Image
by Rich
Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:45 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI
Replies: 22
Views: 4980

Re: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI

... I think it shows what the FI would be along points of a circle equidistant from the old WWJ tower, about 14 miles away. Correct. I don't know why the first circle is 0 and not the center of the graph. I set the lower limit of the scale to less than zero field to give more resolution to the lowe...
by Rich
Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:54 am
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI
Replies: 22
Views: 4980

Re: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI

(Corrected for 5 kW at common point) Below is a NEC4.2 study showing the nighttime groundwave fields at a radius of 14 miles from WWJ using their tx site on 8 Mile Road (if I did it right). The array parameters were taken from the links provided earlier in this thread by CK-722. I didn't bother rot...
by Rich
Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:06 pm
Forum: Engineering & DX'ing
Topic: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI
Replies: 22
Views: 4980

Re: WJR vs. WWJ Fields at Utica, MI

CK-722 wrote:
Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:36 pm
...Can you find enough data to reconstruct the WWJ site near 8 Mile and Meyers with a 186 degree antenna at the Hall and Van Dyke RL? ...
A quick look at that for the 5 kW, non-D case shows about 20 mV/m at Van Dyke and Hall Rds, Utica (14 mile path at N30°E).