$23k "traffic impact" fee for a small house is way wrong.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/su ... r-BB1lzo5C
Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 12 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Supreme Court Hits One Out Of The Park
- audiophile
- Posts: 8608
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
- Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.
Supreme Court Hits One Out Of The Park
Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!
Re: Supreme Court Hits One Out Of The Park
The fact that it actually had to make it to the SCOTUS should concern all of us.
and (from the article) re; "because local governments tend to exhaust their property tax revenues on ongoing expenses," ... perhaps the local governments need to work on the "ongoing expense" so this is not an issue!
and (from the article) re; "because local governments tend to exhaust their property tax revenues on ongoing expenses," ... perhaps the local governments need to work on the "ongoing expense" so this is not an issue!
- MWmetalhead
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12216
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am
Re: Supreme Court Hits One Out Of The Park
This case is far from over.
From the article:
From the article:
California sure has a knack for taxing anything & everything....The U.S. Supreme Court vacated that ruling and remanded it back to the state court to decide whether or not the $23,000 fee is constitutional under the new framework clarifying legislature-created fees are still subject to the tests.
In a separate opinion Justice Brett Kavanaugh clarified that this ruling ”does not address or prohibit the common government practice of imposing permit conditions, such as impact fees, on new developments through reasonable formulas or schedules that assess the impact of classes of development rather than the impact of specific parcels of property.”
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.