SOME INTERESTING POINTS ABOUT FREEDOM AND THE RULE OF LAW

[lovinlife101]

Or walk up to me and yell the "N" word and get your butt beat !!!!!!

The “N” word is free speech. Your violence is a crime. Know the difference.

While it protects you from the government your speech could easily and justifiably turn into violence from an individual especially if they manage to provoke you into swinging first... you lose.

Private individuals don’t have to abide by or put up with your nonsense. Only government does.

Justifying violence? Nice. You know who also did that? Only Hitler.

It’s interesting that you would push for criminal charges for someone who yells “fire” in a crowded theater, but would defend violence toward someone who made someone else upset with their words.

Can’t have it both ways, Skippy!

[lovinlife101]

Or walk up to me and yell the "N" word and get your butt beat !!!!!!

The “N” word is free speech. Your violence is a crime. Know the difference.

While it protects you from the government your speech could easily and justifiably turn into violence from an individual especially if they manage to provoke you into swinging first... you lose.

Private individuals don’t have to abide by or put up with your nonsense. Only government does.

Justifying violence? Nice. You know who also did that? Only Hitler.

It’s interesting that you would push for criminal charges for someone who yells “fire” in a crowded theater, but would defend violence toward someone who made someone else upset with their words.

Can’t have it both ways, Skippy!

Ah the Hitler tactic, an automatic sign that you’ve lost the argument.

Both support violence. Prove me wrong.

[lovinlife101]

Or walk up to me and yell the "N" word and get your butt beat !!!!!!

The “N” word is free speech. Your violence is a crime. Know the difference.

While it protects you from the government your speech could easily and justifiably turn into violence from an individual especially if they manage to provoke you into swinging first... you lose.

Private individuals don’t have to abide by or put up with your nonsense. Only government does.

Justifying violence? Nice. You know who also did that? Only Hitler.

It’s interesting that you would push for criminal charges for someone who yells “fire” in a crowded theater, but would defend violence toward someone who made someone else upset with their words.

Can’t have it both ways, Skippy!

Ah the Hitler tactic, an automatic sign that you’ve lost the argument.

Both support violence. Prove me wrong.

Your use of Hitler here is called Reducto Ad Hitlarium... defined as the inability to use reason to win an argument and so the person invoking Hitler has no choice but to go to the gutter.

If it’s easier for you to understand, replace Hitler with Pol Pot.