Acceptable registrations in the queue through April 26 at 9:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

Supreme Court Hits One Out Of The Park

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
User avatar
audiophile
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:21 pm
Location: Between 88 and 108 MHz.

Supreme Court Hits One Out Of The Park

Post by audiophile » Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:02 pm

$23k "traffic impact" fee for a small house is way wrong.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/su ... r-BB1lzo5C


Ask not what your country can do FOR you; ask what they are about to do TO YOU!!

km1125
Posts: 3618
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Re: Supreme Court Hits One Out Of The Park

Post by km1125 » Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:59 pm

The fact that it actually had to make it to the SCOTUS should concern all of us.

and (from the article) re; "because local governments tend to exhaust their property tax revenues on ongoing expenses," ... perhaps the local governments need to work on the "ongoing expense" so this is not an issue!

User avatar
MWmetalhead
Site Admin
Posts: 12077
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:23 am

Re: Supreme Court Hits One Out Of The Park

Post by MWmetalhead » Sat Apr 13, 2024 7:55 pm

This case is far from over.

From the article:
...The U.S. Supreme Court vacated that ruling and remanded it back to the state court to decide whether or not the $23,000 fee is constitutional under the new framework clarifying legislature-created fees are still subject to the tests.

In a separate opinion Justice Brett Kavanaugh clarified that this ruling ”does not address or prohibit the common government practice of imposing permit conditions, such as impact fees, on new developments through reasonable formulas or schedules that assess the impact of classes of development rather than the impact of specific parcels of property.”
California sure has a knack for taxing anything & everything.
Morgan Wallen is a piece of garbage.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic