You are correct !lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:33 pmBoth support violence. Prove me wrong.NS8401 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 2:50 pmAh the Hitler tactic, an automatic sign that you’ve lost the argument.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 1:04 pmJustifying violence? Nice. You know who also did that? Only Hitler.NS8401 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:54 amWhile it protects you from the government your speech could easily and justifiably turn into violence from an individual especially if they manage to provoke you into swinging first... you lose.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:21 amThe “N” word is free speech. Your violence is a crime. Know the difference.borderboy653659200 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:54 amOr walk up to me and yell the "N" word and get your butt beat !!!!!!
Private individuals don’t have to abide by or put up with your nonsense. Only government does.
It’s interesting that you would push for criminal charges for someone who yells “fire” in a crowded theater, but would defend violence toward someone who made someone else upset with their words.
Can’t have it both ways, Skippy!
Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 6 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619
SOME INTERESTING POINTS ABOUT FREEDOM AND THE RULE OF LAW
-
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:08 pm
- Location: Novi, MI
- Contact:
Re: SOME INTERESTING POINTS ABOUT FREEDOM AND THE RULE OF LAW
Music is my life.
Re: SOME INTERESTING POINTS ABOUT FREEDOM AND THE RULE OF LAW
Your use of Hitler here is called Reducto Ad Hitlarium... defined as the inability to use reason to win an argument and so the person invoking Hitler has no choice but to go to the gutter.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:33 pmBoth support violence. Prove me wrong.NS8401 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 2:50 pmAh the Hitler tactic, an automatic sign that you’ve lost the argument.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 1:04 pmJustifying violence? Nice. You know who also did that? Only Hitler.NS8401 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:54 amWhile it protects you from the government your speech could easily and justifiably turn into violence from an individual especially if they manage to provoke you into swinging first... you lose.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:21 amThe “N” word is free speech. Your violence is a crime. Know the difference.borderboy653659200 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:54 amOr walk up to me and yell the "N" word and get your butt beat !!!!!!
Private individuals don’t have to abide by or put up with your nonsense. Only government does.
It’s interesting that you would push for criminal charges for someone who yells “fire” in a crowded theater, but would defend violence toward someone who made someone else upset with their words.
Can’t have it both ways, Skippy!
Re: SOME INTERESTING POINTS ABOUT FREEDOM AND THE RULE OF LAW
In that context you are simply speaking unreasoned babble. Nice job proving my point that you have no reasoned argument. You lose as always.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:44 pmIf it’s easier for you to understand, replace Hitler with Pol Pot.NS8401 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:39 pmYour use of Hitler here is called Reducto Ad Hitlarium... defined as the inability to use reason to win an argument and so the person invoking Hitler has no choice but to go to the gutter.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:33 pmBoth support violence. Prove me wrong.NS8401 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 2:50 pmAh the Hitler tactic, an automatic sign that you’ve lost the argument.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 1:04 pmJustifying violence? Nice. You know who also did that? Only Hitler.NS8401 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:54 amWhile it protects you from the government your speech could easily and justifiably turn into violence from an individual especially if they manage to provoke you into swinging first... you lose.lovinlife101 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 11:21 amThe “N” word is free speech. Your violence is a crime. Know the difference.borderboy653659200 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 29, 2019 9:54 amOr walk up to me and yell the "N" word and get your butt beat !!!!!!
Private individuals don’t have to abide by or put up with your nonsense. Only government does.
It’s interesting that you would push for criminal charges for someone who yells “fire” in a crowded theater, but would defend violence toward someone who made someone else upset with their words.
Can’t have it both ways, Skippy!
Re: SOME INTERESTING POINTS ABOUT FREEDOM AND THE RULE OF LAW
That’s because every post that LL 101 has is useless babble, Not one has any value.