Acceptable registrations in the queue through May 6 at 7:00p ET have now been activated. Enjoy! -M.W.

Terms of Use have been amended effective October 6, 2019. Make sure you are aware of the new rules! Please visit this thread for details: https://www.mibuzzboard.com/phpBB3/view ... 16&t=48619

White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Debate and discussion of current events and political issues across the U.S. and throughout the World. Be forewarned -- this forum is NOT for the intellectually weak or those of you with thin skins. Don't come crying to me if you become the subject of ridicule. **Board Administrator reserves the right to revoke posting privileges based on my sole discretion**
Deleted User 8570

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Tue May 17, 2016 9:16 am

Matt wrote:http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local ... 32041.html

The new directive certainly makes incidents like this more likely to happen.

A common tactic of the left when they are beaten in an argument (in addition to changing the subject as Bryce noted) is to accuse their opponents of being homophobic or racist.
Don't include me in that... My argument is this is not an enabler...



pbr

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by pbr » Tue May 17, 2016 10:08 am

Surely the timing is completely coincidental that this "guidance" was released late in the same week that Ben Rhodes shot off his mouth about how he manipulated the Iran deal into being.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that many of those on the social left have no problem with this, as an abuse of power in their favor is welcome. However, an abuse of power is still an abuse.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7144
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Bryce » Tue May 17, 2016 10:36 am

zzand wrote:Devils advocate question here that is still on target. Let's say a boy, who feels he is a girl, wants to join a girls sports team and likewise a girl feels she is a boy and wants on a boy sports team, does this new rule also cover that? if not then those "rights" are still being violated, right?
From the "directive".
Title IX regulations permit a school to operate or sponsor sex-segregated athletics teams
when selection for such teams is based upon competitive skill or when the activity involved is a
contact sport.16 A school may not, however, adopt or adhere to requirements that rely on overly
broad generalizations or stereotypes about the differences between transgender students and
other students of the same sex (i.e., the same gender identity) or others’ discomfort with
transgender students.17 Title IX does not prohibit age-appropriate, tailored requirements based on
sound, current, and research-based medical knowledge about the impact of the students’
participation on the competitive fairness or physical safety of the sport.18
https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/850986/download
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

zzand
Posts: 1852
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:16 am
Location: right here

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by zzand » Tue May 17, 2016 10:49 am

Bryce if I reading what you posted right then the transgender student is being discriminated against so i assume it will only be a matter of time until that is changed as well.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7144
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Bryce » Tue May 17, 2016 11:08 am

zzand wrote:Bryce if I reading what you posted right then the transgender student is being discriminated against so i assume it will only be a matter of time until that is changed as well.
Reading the "directive" from the administration in toto, if one follows the "directive", a boy who identifies as a girl and wants to join the girl's volleyball team would have to be allowed to do so.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7144
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Bryce » Tue May 17, 2016 11:52 am

pbr wrote:Surely the timing is completely coincidental that this "guidance" was released late in the same week that Ben Rhodes shot off his mouth about how he manipulated the Iran deal into being.
And although freely running his mouth in the "press", he refused to testify in front of Congress citing executive privilege.
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

User avatar
TC Talks
Posts: 10454
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 2:41 am

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by TC Talks » Thu May 19, 2016 7:16 am

We should be regulating Church bathrooms...
As the transgender bathroom issue gathers steam it’s worth considering this grim fact: Despite all those transgender bathroom laws GOP state legislatures keep passing, a child is far more likely to be molested at church.

In 2014 the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) came out with a report on sexual abuse in the Catholic church. It turns out that from 1950-2013, 17,259 victims made accusations and 6,427 clerics had been counted as “not implausibly” or “credibly” accused. This doesn’t even account for underreporting or include the unusually large number victims who came forward in 2003 in the wake of the Boston Globe‘s eye-opening report on sexual abuse in the Catholic church by their Spotlight team.

Alas, a transgender bathroom law wouldn’t have helped a single one of these victims, many of whom have had to live in silence with their trauma and shame for decades.
http://americannewsx.com/religion/child ... -bathroom/
“Blessed are those who are righteous in his name.”
― Matt

Posting Content © 2024 TC Talks Holdings LP.

Matt
Posts: 10066
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: Where Ben Zonia couldn't cut it

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Matt » Thu May 19, 2016 12:29 pm

NS8401 wrote:
Matt wrote:http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local ... 32041.html

The new directive certainly makes incidents like this more likely to happen.

A common tactic of the left when they are beaten in an argument (in addition to changing the subject as Bryce noted) is to accuse their opponents of being homophobic or racist.
Don't include me in that... My argument is this is not an enabler...
You are excepted. I do not recall you resorting to lazy -ist/-phobic name-calling.
Voting for Trump is dumber than playing Russian Roulette with fully loaded chambers.

**This space lives rent-free in BMW's head**

Deleted User 8570

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Thu May 19, 2016 3:57 pm

Matt wrote:
NS8401 wrote:
Matt wrote:http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local ... 32041.html

The new directive certainly makes incidents like this more likely to happen.

A common tactic of the left when they are beaten in an argument (in addition to changing the subject as Bryce noted) is to accuse their opponents of being homophobic or racist.
Don't include me in that... My argument is this is not an enabler...
You are excepted. I do not recall you resorting to lazy -ist/-phobic name-calling.
Thank you, that kind of stuff is rather tiresome anyways.

User avatar
Bryce
Posts: 7144
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:04 pm

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Bryce » Thu May 19, 2016 7:15 pm

Coming to a ladies bathroom near you....

Image
New York and Chicago were all in with respect to their sanctuary status — until they were hit with the challenge of actually providing sanctuary. In other words, typical liberal hypocrisy.

Deleted User 8570

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Deleted User 8570 » Thu May 19, 2016 8:37 pm

Bryce wrote:Coming to a ladies bathroom near you....

Image
:eek

Mega Hertz
Posts: 4266
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:09 pm
Location: Brighton

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by Mega Hertz » Sun May 22, 2016 2:49 am

NS8401 wrote:
Bryce wrote:Coming to a ladies bathroom near you....

Image
:eek
I suddenly regret starting this thread. Now remember children, actions have consequences.

And this is the consequence of going overboard on the booger sugar...



ETA: I didn't know Dave Mustaine and Tori Amos had a child!
"Internet is no more like radio than intravenous feeding is like fine dining."
-TurkeyTop

User avatar
48125er
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:50 pm

Re: White House to Public Schools: You May Lose Funding

Post by 48125er » Tue May 24, 2016 12:43 am

naw this is way way more realistic, your wives would agree

https://i.imgflip.com/12lqu8.jpg

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic